Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who is or was Hariri?

trimmed from wikipedia -

Rafic Baha El Deen Al-Hariri (November 1, 1944 – February 14, 2005, Arabic: رفيق بهاء الدين الحريري‎), was a business tycoon and the Prime Minister of Lebanon from 1992 to 1998 and again from 2000 until his resignation, 20 October 2004...

...Hariri was assassinated on 14 February 2005 when explosives equivalent to around 1000 kg of TNT were detonated as his motorcade drove past the St. George Hotel in the Lebanese capital, Beirut.
 
trimmed from wikipedia -

Rafic Baha El Deen Al-Hariri (November 1, 1944 – February 14, 2005, Arabic: رفيق بهاء الدين الحريري‎), was a business tycoon and the Prime Minister of Lebanon from 1992 to 1998 and again from 2000 until his resignation, 20 October 2004...

...Hariri was assassinated on 14 February 2005 when explosives equivalent to around 1000 kg of TNT were detonated as his motorcade drove past the St. George Hotel in the Lebanese capital, Beirut.

Thank you.
 
there's a dedicated thread in the HDDesign material, you can find it here:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about3-hddesign.html

Well, I just looked through the first page of that thread.

You state that the killing of Hariri "came to mind" after learning about a mag7 earthquake along the coast of California, 120 days after the killing of Hariri.
This constitutes the detailing of 'identification' of the Hariri assassination.
There is no indication of the source of your obsession with Hariri.

It contains mostly copy/paste texts from newsreleases and such, without mentioning sources or even appropriately seperating your own texts from the sourced texts. It also contains your personal opinion about how the killing of Hariri links with a hypothetical WWIII through various intermediate events, which are injudiciously selected and interpreted from newsreleases by you.
Your inclination towards verbalising violence comes to mind.

That thread effectively represents your personal opinion about why the Hariri killing should lead to WWIII, interspersed ofcourse with 'HD octahedrons' and 'evolving timeframes' and 'golden Mean timespirals' and 'Tetrahedron HD keynumbers' and 'and underlying themes' and 'patterns'.
Even 'quantum' is thrown in the mix.

You have integrated Hariri into your personal opinion to such a degree, that the guy has become a major fixture in your mind.

So, the question remains, what is the source your obsession with Hariri, such that you put a picture of his statue prominently on the frontpage of your forum?
 
Last edited:
I the meanwhile, this weekend Mars Express will flyby Phobos again, with its closest approach. I wonder if new orbital data of Phobos will become available to the public. Remember, Phobos orbit is in decay and orbital period is closing in on 1/Pi. Last available data showed Phobos is less than a minute off.

Did you predict Hariri's assasination? What will this orbital data help you to predict?
 
... I wonder if new orbital data of Phobos will become available to the public. ...

And then what? What can you possibly do with orbital data?
Not much I think.

Except, ask someone else to do your 'homework' for you.
 
Dutch, how do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you can't even admit to a simple error of research?

You were wrong, therefore you calculations were incorrect and claiming it is part of the system just because you mentioned it is, at the very least, silly.

You were informed of your error and you proceeded to compound it by refusing to accept the situation, implying that we were wrong instead. Now, you accept the new data as if nothing happened and merely say "I'll keep an eye on it".

It reminds me a bit of the multitudes of edits he does in his posts on his forum.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6524518&postcount=3565
Furthermore:

Q3 2010 timeline, July - August - September 2010
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=408&mforum=hddesign
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:43 pm
Last edited by Dutch on Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:04 pm; edited 150 times in total

--

Q4 2009 Timeline, October, November and December 2009
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=386&mforum=hddesign
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:38 am
Last edited by Dutch on Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:48 am; edited 173 times in total

--

Every few months, Dutch starts a new thread of predictions, then edits it every day or two.


while he happily maintains he doesn't change his posts there. Except when it suits him, you see.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6548149&postcount=3625
I just want to make clear that I do not change the posts that I've made.

... I do not change or deleted if it doesn't suit me.
...
 
fact is, that the orbit of 2009 HC82 was initially determined at 3,39 days. An orbit showing these Pi based correlations ( inwards and outwards ) with the 1111 days awakeningsrtimeframe as explained. That's how it became part of consciousness.

Part of what “consciousness”? Your “consciousness”? What is so important about your “consciousness” or your “Pi based correlations” which amounts to you just multiplying some period by .4493 and then by 9.8796?


2009 HC82 has yet to complete its first full orbit after discovery and indeed the orbital data could change.

So then the orbital period wasn’t “determined” as you claimed above and indeed the orbital projection (based on the orbital data) has in fact changed.

The thought was to apply Pi on this specific initial 'awakenings' orbit, with the expected perihelion as marker. When doing so, these 2 dates showed up as explained, giving instant 'confirmation'.

Well, your thought wrong and your purported “instant 'confirmation'” was premature to say the very least.

This is how this HDDesign 'research' works, identifying patterns by intuitive thoughts and synchronocoties, giving instant 'confirmation'.

This demonstrates that your “HDDesign 'research'” doesn’t work as it is just you giving yourself some instant gratification from your “instant 'confirmation'” based on premature or incomplete data.

If the real orbit is also 1468 days as the latest update seems to indicate, than its worth to give that a look too. In that case the 2 Pi points are around August 25, 2010, which is also on the timeline for Q3 2010 with the underlying 'contact' theme ( http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=408&mforum=hddesign ) and around upcoming January 20, 2011.

So that is actually how your “HDDesign 'research' works”? If your “instant 'confirmation'” is wrong just shift over to somewhere else where you can try to claim some other kind of “synchronocoties, giving” now less than “instant 'confirmation'”. Color me unsurprised.

I'll keep an eye on it

You’ll keep your eye on what, the orbital period or the shifting goal posts you now want to kick it through to claim a ‘score’?
 
I want to start this update with a resume written on March 26, 2010:
Breach of rule 4 removed. Do not copy and paste material available on other sites. If you wish to discuss something posted elsewhere, a link and short sample should suffice.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles


read full post at HDDesign forum
 
Last edited by a moderator:
part 2 of update January 13
Breach of rule 4 removed.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dutch cannot explain anything. He can only perform minor obfuscation, which only works on people who are completely unfamiliar with critical thinking and/or common sense.
 
He also hasn't provided a proper response to:

Dutch,

You are still avoiding to present the calculations...
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6672143&postcount=3950
and:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6677698&postcount=3966

...I asked for on your insistence
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6670150&postcount=3935
not at all. ask specifically and I will calculate it .

come on, ask it.

bolding and font enlargement by Daylightstar
Being honorable does not appear to be one of Dutch's traits.
 
It's interesting to see that Dutch is trying to create the idea that he is not copy/pasting long tracts of texts which are available elsewhere, by inserting a quote box with the text "===snip=== read elswhere on the internet ", and deviding these texts across several posts...again.
The quotebox is supposed to draw attention to this rather deceitful act.
 
Last edited:
I want to start this update with a resume written on March 26, 2010:

So Stardust is going to visit comet Tempel 1
Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1 on July 4, 2005
Stardust released a sample material capsule on January 15, 2006. It was the first sample return mission to collect cosmic dust and return the sample to Earth.
This second mission for Stardust was approved on July 3, 2007, with Earth at same orbital position as during Deep Impact on comet tempel 1.
I hope its about clear that this specific Pi based Design as determined in this HDDesign 'research' ,was first unveiled with the Deep Impact/Epoxi - Earth - Moon Transit on May 29, 2008 , in relation to Deep Impact and the scheduled/communicated comet encounter with Hartley 2 on October 11, 2010. ( see explanations )
With this specific Pi based Design 2 Pi points are determined on a timeframe, unveiling profound correlations ever since its discovery.
I thought Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1 and Stardust MUST give confirmation of this underlying Design
July 4, 2005 ( Deep Imapct Tempel 1) and January 15, 2006 ( Stardust ) are 195 days apart. When considered to be the 2 Pi points, then the timeline is 1925 days and will end on............MAY 29, 2008!!!!!!
The day of the Deep Impact - Earth - Moon transit that first unveiled this specific Pi- based design!!!!!
That was back in time, let's try forward
the 2 Pi points on a timeline of 1925 days that starts on May 29, 2008 are on day 865 and 1060, the first is ..........
the scheduled/communicated comet encounter with Hartley 2 on October 11, 2010!!!!!!! , unveiling this very same Pi-based Design for the first time.
The second Pi point is around April 24, 2011 and will be put on the timeline Q2, 2011

read full post at HDDesign forum

What is going to happen? If you can't tell me that then you are just spouting your usual nonsense.
 
What is going to happen? ...

The 'indications' of 'hidden underlying' 'design' can be found on a multitude of other sites.
'design' = posting huge amounts of same gibberish on many sites.

When those indications appear, these huge amounts of gibberish will also appear in this thread, in one form or another.
That is what is going to happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom