Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dutch said:
I have already explained it back in 2005. Why do you use these silly emoticons?

Aren't you able to show a little respect for someone else?

Do I treat you like that?

Since you don't read it, I will repeat it:

A Hyperdimensional Interference point in our 3-dimensional reality is the Cube latitude of 45 degrees North and South.
Mount st. Helens is located at 46.2 degrees North latitude, 122.8 West Longtitude, very close to the perfect HD location of 45 degrees.
Remember the Olympic openings ceremony in Athens: The Earth visualised as a rotating Cube.
The events related to mount st Helens could be Hyperdimensionally initiated
a volcano is fixed in the outer crust but due to continental drift the volcano could have been moved through time, compared to the 'perfect' Hyperdimensional spot. Due to Earth's rotation, a fixed point on the solid crust at Northern Hemisphere will drift to the North and to the West.
In a sense, St helens could be seen as the easiest way out at the HD Cube for a period of time, but that St. Helens is off the perfect HD Cube spot. ( in relation to our 3 dimensional visibility of Hyper Dimensional energy flows)
The same process at work can be seen when looking at the islands of Hawaii.
Through time, the outer crust drifted over the perfect Tetrahedronal location of 19.47 degrees latitude, creating a chain of islands as we see today.
So if we recalculate the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens, we have to reverse the continental drift so to speek and we should look for seismic activities at the aprox. location
of 45 degrees North Latitude and with a Longtitude East of 122,8 West on Northern Hemisphere.

YELLOWSTONE

Yellowstone is Located around 45 degrees North and 110 West Longtitude, perfectly fitting the reversed continental drift, closer to the calculted HD Cube spot ( based on the above estimates).
So Mt. st Helens and Yellowstone could be related and St' Helens activities could be an indication something is up at yellowstone, the creation of a new volcano near the HD Cube interference spot?
Click to expand...

All those "could be"s, yet you're so certain of HDD. You're not thinking clearly, Dutch.

How can pretty, elastic patterns cause volcanoes to erupt?

I shouldn't have to know about or reseach something you said five years ago. This is a discussion forum. We're here to discuss.
 
Dutch said:
I have already explained it back in 2005. Why do you use these silly emoticons?

Aren't you able to show a little respect for someone else?

Do I treat you like that?

Since you don't read it, I will repeat it:

A Hyperdimensional Interference point in our 3-dimensional reality is the Cube latitude of 45 degrees North and South.
Mount st. Helens is located at 46.2 degrees North latitude, 122.8 West Longtitude, very close to the perfect HD location of 45 degrees.
Remember the Olympic openings ceremony in Athens: The Earth visualised as a rotating Cube.
The events related to mount st Helens could be Hyperdimensionally initiated
a volcano is fixed in the outer crust but due to continental drift the volcano could have been moved through time, compared to the 'perfect' Hyperdimensional spot. Due to Earth's rotation, a fixed point on the solid crust at Northern Hemisphere will drift to the North and to the West.
In a sense, St helens could be seen as the easiest way out at the HD Cube for a period of time, but that St. Helens is off the perfect HD Cube spot. ( in relation to our 3 dimensional visibility of Hyper Dimensional energy flows)
The same process at work can be seen when looking at the islands of Hawaii.
Through time, the outer crust drifted over the perfect Tetrahedronal location of 19.47 degrees latitude, creating a chain of islands as we see today.
So if we recalculate the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens, we have to reverse the continental drift so to speek and we should look for seismic activities at the aprox. location
of 45 degrees North Latitude and with a Longtitude East of 122,8 West on Northern Hemisphere.

YELLOWSTONE

Yellowstone is Located around 45 degrees North and 110 West Longtitude, perfectly fitting the reversed continental drift, closer to the calculted HD Cube spot ( based on the above estimates).
So Mt. st Helens and Yellowstone could be related and St' Helens activities could be an indication something is up at yellowstone, the creation of a new volcano near the HD Cube interference spot?
Click to expand...

Lots of exciting terms and concepts there, Dutch, like "Hyperdimensional Interference point" and a "cube latitude" The latter reminds me of Gene Ray - not related, is it? My curiosity is piqued - Could you pleased define your terms and take us through how you do this? I ask you yet again because this all sounds so scientific that I find it hard to believe that you might just be making the whole thing up as you go along.
 
Last edited:
Sideroxylon said:
Lots of exciting terms and concepts there, Dutch, like "Hyperdimensional Interference point" and a "cube latitude" The latter reminds me of Gene Ray - not related, is it? My curiosity is piqued - Could you pleased define your terms and take us through how you do this? I ask you yet again because this all sounds so scientific that I find it hard you might just be making the whole thing up as you go along.
Click to expand...

Actually it sounds more like the stuff Hoagland talks about. I'm particularly struck by the "someplace important is at almost such and such degrees" meme. You'd think a "science" that was so powerful would be a bit more exacting.
 
Chris L said:
Actually it sounds more like the stuff Hoagland talks about. I'm particularly struck by the "someplace important is at almost such and such degrees" meme. You'd think a "science" that was so powerful would be a bit more exacting.
Click to expand...

You would think so. As you say though, it all seems rather rough and ready. I don't get the Hoagland link though I have only listened to bits and pieces on YouTube about moon bases and the like.
 
dutch said:
and again i have to say that i have already said it here in this thread.

Its very annoying to have to respond to someone why doesn't actually tries to understand what this is about and doesn't even read the related posts.

I would appreciate it if you would try to do your best to comprehend and read. If you can.
Click to expand...

predict something!!!
 
Sideroxylon said:
You would think so. As you say though, it all seems rather rough and ready. I don't get the Hoagland link though I have only listened to bits and pieces on YouTube about moon bases and the like.
Click to expand...

This HD physics thing is a pretty big deal in Hoagland's world. He "discovered" it while looking at the area around the "face on Mars". Seems there is a city there (if you wish real hard) and the angles that connect it all have these mysterious numerical regularities. Instead of cubes though, the sacred shape for Hoagland is the tetrahedron. The angles involved are 19.5, 39, and 33. He likes to find places on Earth that are close to those, and tends to use them as stunning proof of his theories.
 
Chris L said:
This HD physics thing is a pretty big deal in Hoagland's world. He "discovered" it while looking at the area around the "face on Mars". Seems there is a city there (if you wish real hard) and the angles that connect it all have these mysterious numerical regularities. Instead of cubes though, the sacred shape for Hoagland is the tetrahedron. The angles involved are 19.5, 39, and 33. He likes to find places on Earth that are close to those, and tends to use them as stunning proof of his theories.
Click to expand...


I for one am, well, stunned.
 
Ah, nice. I note that Dutch has studiously ignored each and every one of my questions. I can't say I'm surprised at all. I knew when I asked those questions that there weren't going to be any answers. I am a little surprised he didn't at least try to flub his way through it.
 
Dutch said:
If you have read the update, you would have known that I have said in advance that yellowstone doesn't have to blow. It depends how we will deal with the Hariri issue, which is still pending and about to escalate soon.
Click to expand...
bolding by Daylightstar
In your 'update' you did not state that it depends on the 'Hariri issue', you stated:

"As I have said before, the eruption of Yellowstone is potentially there, but she doesn’t have to blow with full force. Like I said it depends on how we will deal with the given warnings, “stay out of space / remain Earthbound and don’t mess with nuclear power”.

With that out of the way, what's with your Hariri obsession by the way?
The picture of a Hariri statue is featured very prominently on your own forum.
It's almost as if HDD centers around Hariri.

Do you think this and the repeated mentionning of his name will attract a certain kind of attention?
Do you fantasize that you will be the psychic the middle east turns to for answers.....if only they would listen to you?
Or simply to have some kind of 'influence"?
 
Last edited:
Mister Earl said:
Ah, nice. I note that Dutch has studiously ignored each and every one of my questions. I can't say I'm surprised at all. I knew when I asked those questions that there weren't going to be any answers. I am a little surprised he didn't at least try to flub his way through it.
Click to expand...

Ignoring questions is Dutch's modus operandi.
 
Dutch said:
new update posted!!

Awakening in optima forma

Unfortunately not allowed to post at JREF's, but you can find it here:

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=12296&mforum=hddesign#12296

I will respond to outstanding issues that haven't been addressed yet in this thread here probably later today
Click to expand...

Like the esoteric works of Immanuel Kant, you need to provide a commentary for the mere mortals among your readers. Instead of just dropping a link on us, why not provide prediction highlights and a brief explanation of how you reach this conclusion from the list of events you give?

Show us how this thing has utility. Or if it has no predictive utility but is limited to post-dictions, at least give us an insight into your method.
 
Last edited:
Dutch said:
I will respond to outstanding issues that haven't been addressed yet in this thread here probably later today
Click to expand...
You may respond. but I can predict, with far greater accuracy than you, that you will most certainly not properly address any issues.
 
Dutch said:
Its very annoying to have to respond to someone why doesn't actually tries to understand what this is about and doesn't even read the related posts.
Click to expand...

I can just as easily talk about how annoying it is to have someone claim that something is fact, then refuse to provide a testable hypothesis, precise definitions for terms, math involved in calculations, a thoroughly explained process from beginning to end...

Dutch said:
I have recommended several times to follow the timelines for a while. If you really want to know it is the best way to get an idea of how this works.
Click to expand...

And you've been told literally thousands of times that timelines are not proof. Retroactive predictions are not evidence. And sorry to correct you, yet again, but the best way to show us how HDD works is to outline your process. To break it down to a level that even a four year old can understand, the best way to learn how an engine works is to have someone show you all the parts. What you're doing is like telling us that driving the car around the block once is all we need to understand how an engine works.

Dutch said:
I may be not a smart person like you say, but it is fact that this Pi based design showed up just like that and is valid for orbits of comet Temple 1, Hartley 2, the deep Impact space mission, Phobos steins , 3200 phaeton and more examples in the material.

Its not a matter of believing it, its a matter of understanding the math.
Click to expand...

Good. POST THE MATH. All of it. Then explain in detail why each component matters. You made the claim that you actually use math, here, and I'm calling you on it.

Dutch said:
Orbits of Earth, Venus and 3200 phaeton are used in a correlation based on Pi, as explained. What's your problem?
Click to expand...

Don't know about him, but my problem is that statement is utterly meaningless. That's like me saying "The orbits of the magic hyperdimensional teapot and the time-proof space infant are used in a correlation based on a box of wheaties." Neither your statement nor mine are explained, and neither make sense.

Dutch said:
new update posted!!

Awakening in optima forma

Unfortunately not allowed to post at JREF's, but you can find it here:

[woo site snipped]

I will respond to outstanding issues that haven't been addressed yet in this thread here probably later today
Click to expand...

And I predict that you will not predict anything, will refuse all forms of precision, post more meaningless noise to obfuscate the obvious lack of content, then get defensive when we call the local waste management company to come collect all the garbage. I also predict that my prediction will be proved correct far sooner than any of yours will be, and mine don't have to be retroactive predictions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom