Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Daylightstar said:
Weasel, weasel.

Oh and look, a prediction. Actually, it's a non-prediction.
Click to expand...

and again I have to say that I have already said it here in this thread.

Its very annoying to have to respond to someone why doesn't actually tries to understand what this is about and doesn't even read the related posts.

I would appreciate it if you would try to do your best to comprehend and read. If you can.
 
Daylightstar said:
yes, a meaningless post and a meaningless reply to ask reading it again.

It's not the first time you ignore the content of a post you reply to.
The post you replied to still stands as valid.
Click to expand...

??

he/she claimed that I was off like 400 days in a year compared to 365,25

while it was mathematically matching, only seconds off due to rounding

sometimes I get the feeling you are deliberately acting this way just to obstruct me.
 
Dutch said:
and again I have to say that I have already said it here in this thread.

Its very annoying to have to respond to someone why doesn't actually tries to understand what this is about and doesn't even read the related posts.

I would appreciate it if you would try to do your best to comprehend and read. If you can.
Click to expand...

So, with respect to HDD, according to you, their is no science, no system and you say you don't know why you 'calculate' the way you do. It's a psychic exercise you say.
In your head something goes: clickety click screeetch thump, and you think you have hit on 'Pi based design'. Just like that, out of nowhere.
No support for this notion whatsoever. You think it is convincing because you believe it.

Dutch, to be honest, based on your posts and the way you 'handle' things, you do not appear to be a very smart person. You believing what you say has no convincing power whatsoever.

And then there is this constant refusal to divulge your methods in detail. The only thing you do is repeat the same vague stuff.
Maybe you should practise showing some respect for your fellow forum users.
 
Dutch said:
??

he/she claimed that I was off like 400 days in a year compared to 365,25

while it was mathematically matching, only seconds off due to rounding

sometimes I get the feeling you are deliberately acting this way just to obstruct me.
Click to expand...

You've shown no mathematics at all, just random elementary arithmetic.

And as far as the he/she remark, you were already informed which option was applicable.
Get with it, Dutch.
 
Sideroxylon said:
Why cant you take us through one of your successes, step by step?

Go on! Indulge me ... please?
Click to expand...

I have recommended several times to follow the timelines for a while. If you really want to know it is the best way to get an idea of how this works.
 
Dutch said:
I have recommended several times to follow the timelines for a while. If you really want to know it is the best way to get an idea of how this works.
Click to expand...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6648127&postcount=3825
Daylightstar said:
...
And then there is this constant refusal to divulge your methods in detail. The only thing you do is repeat the same vague stuff.
Maybe you should practise showing some respect for your fellow forum users.
Click to expand...
 
In your head something goes: clickety click screeetch thump, and you think you have hit on 'Pi based design'. Just like that, out of nowhere.
No support for this notion whatsoever. You think it is convincing because you believe it.
Click to expand...

I may be not a smart person like you say, but it is fact that this Pi based design showed up just like that and is valid for orbits of comet Temple 1, Hartley 2, the deep Impact space mission, Phobos steins , 3200 phaeton and more examples in the material.

Its not a matter of believing it, its a matter of understanding the math.
 
Dutch said:
I may be not a smart person like you say, but it is fact that this Pi based design showed up just like that and is valid for orbits of comet Temple 1, Hartley 2, the deep Impact space mission, Phobos steins , 3200 phaeton and more examples in the material.

Its not a matter of believing it, its a matter of understanding the math.
Click to expand...

There is no indication of this being a fact, at all. There is no support for this notion whatsoever.
You want it to be true, this doesn't make it a fact.
 
Dutch said:
?
You talk as if I haven't posted it?
I think I have spend enough time on you for now.
Click to expand...

As I said, you've shown no mathematics at all, just random elementary arithmetic.
It's very telling that you left out the "just random elementary arithmetic." part of the post you quoted.
 
Daylightstar said:
There is no indication of this being a fact, at all. There is no support for this notion whatsoever.
You want it to be true, this doesn't make it a fact.
Click to expand...


Oh yes, I have posted it in this thread here.

BTW I just posted on my forum:

I thought it was about time to filter the 'Pi based Design' from the material and put it in a seperate thread, with a summary.
but there are at least 463 related posts to walk through....
has to wait until I have the time to do so
Click to expand...
 
Daylightstar said:
As I said, you've shown no mathematics at all, just random elementary arithmetic.
It's very telling that you left out the "just random elementary arithmetic." part of the post you quoted.
Click to expand...

Orbits of Earth, Venus and 3200 phaeton are used in a correlation based on Pi, as explained. What's your problem?
 
Dutch said:
Oh yes, I have posted it in this thread here.

BTW I just posted on my forum:
Click to expand...

It's just that you cannot point to it.

The post on your forum? '463 related posts'? If there was anything of value in there with respect to properly detailing your methods, we would have known already.

Until now? Nothing.
 
Dutch said:
Orbits of Earth, Venus and 3200 phaeton are used in a correlation based on Pi, as explained. What's your problem?
Click to expand...

No, numbers pertaining to orbitvalues in days are randomly exchanged and combined. Pi is randomly thrown in the mix twice.
You're not calculating anything.

As I said, you've shown no mathematics at all, just random elementary arithmetic.
 
Last edited:
Daylightstar said:
No, numbers pertaining to orbitvalues in days are randomly exchanged and combined. Pi is randomly thrown in the mix twice.
You're not calculating anything.

As I said, you've shown no mathematics at all, just random elementary arithmetic.
Click to expand...

are you saying that this pi correlation isn't there as explained?

careful now
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom