Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

Of course we did. You were given 60 days to bring something new to the table, and you could not. Why drag it out any longer? You wanted the opportunity to prove HDD was real. You were not able. That was years ago. You still have not.

30 days earl, know your facts

30 days to prove an inter-dimensional reality

insane

 

[Paul]

30 days earl, know your facts

30 days to prove an inter-dimensional reality

insane

Obviously arguing about BAUT is the most important thing right now, I presume you intend to ignore anything more complicated as usual.

 

[Dutch]

Again it seems that some readers here at JREF's forum are dismissing the intelligent correlations that are given here. These intelligent correlation appear 'out of the blue' just like that.

Let me elaborate a bit on the implications of these Pi expressions with the Deep impact / epoxi space mission.

When NASA fired a projectile in the nucleus of comet Tempel I on July 4, 2005, it was an event where we passed a red line with. Remember that the material HDDesign already made clear that this event and the decision to use the A-bomb on Nagasaki-Hiroshima, was intelligently marked in our reality with a warning: the Tunguska event on June 30, 1908. This has already been discussed here several times in this thread at JREF's forum, so I won't elaborate on Tunguska in this post.

...

I want to emphasize that I won't respond to requests that have already been addressed here in this thread at JREF's, so make sure you know what you are talking about before accusing me of not giving answers

Snipped for compliance with Rule 4. Do not post lengthy tracts available elsewhere. Instead, post a short quote and a link to the other source. Sprinkling a few "at the JREF" comments into a lengthy cut and paste does not make it any less of a Rule 4 breach.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL

 

[Orphia Nay]

Dutch has been suspended for 3 days for repeated breaches of the Membership Agreement.

While he's gone, he can conjure up an answer to this:

Do you have evidence that Dutch actively alters his posts after the fact?

No, but as he's the administrator there, he has the ability to, which was the point of my post. We've seen him retroactively try to shoehorn hits in here and on the BAUT forums before he was banned. And in this same timespan, he's tried a number of times to carry the discussion to his own personal forums, which I will not do.

not once have I done that, not here, not in the HDDesign material, nowhere else on the internet in thousands of posts!!!!

Liar.

Q4 2010 timeline October, November and December 2010
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=425&mforum=hddesign

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:12 am

Last edited by Dutch on Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:51 pm; edited 61 times in total

 

[Orphia Nay]

Furthermore:

Q3 2010 timeline, July - August - September 2010
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=408&mforum=hddesign
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:43 pm
Last edited by Dutch on Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:04 pm; edited 150 times in total

--

Q4 2009 Timeline, October, November and December 2009
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=386&mforum=hddesign
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:38 am
Last edited by Dutch on Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:48 am; edited 173 times in total

--

Every few months, Dutch starts a new thread of predictions, then edits it every day or two.

 

[Daylightstar]

That was quite an ugly lie, Dutch.

 

[Blue Mountain]

The way I see it, Dutch was disclaiming altering his posts in a manner to make them fit after the fact, as opposed to on-going edits where he adds to the timelines as he makes more and more computations on them.

If he was doing this research in a scientific manner, he should instead use the forum as a notebook and make a new post every time he has something to add. Then he could edit the initial post in each timeline thread as often as he wanted, as long as each line in that initial post contained links to the post in the thread that showed why (and more appropriately when) he made the change.

Ultimately, though, Dutch is not at all interested in approaching this scientifically. If he were, he would have abandoned HDD within a year of starting it because he would have realized his hit rate is no better than chance.

 

[Daylightstar]

Clearly, in contrast to his denial, Dutch alters his posts on his forum.
As far as Mister Earl's distrust for that HDD forum is concerned, I fully understand. Certainly now that it is clear that Dutch does indeed alter posts.

Perhaps, when Dutch returns he should explain/show what kind of alterations he makes to his posts there.

 

[Daylightstar]

30 days earl, know your facts

30 days to prove an inter-dimensional reality

insane

You were not limited to 30, or even 60 days....to show even only the tenets of your hypothesis.

http://www.bautforum.com/member.php/16813-Dutch

• Join Date 11-December-2006

• Last Activity 16-January-2009 09:09 AM

 

[Mister Earl]

The way I see it, Dutch was disclaiming altering his posts in a manner to make them fit after the fact, as opposed to on-going edits where he adds to the timelines as he makes more and more computations on them.

Make sure you say "computations" when doing the air-quotes bit with your fingers. "Computations". As far as I've been able to discern from all the years discussing this, Dutch's predictions just randomly spill from his head. He just dresses them up in fancy word trappings, then says the orbits of major planetary bodies somehow tie in to all of it. It might as well be an augery for all the good it'll do.

He wasn't ever able to explain, you know, why the position of major planetary bodies had anything to do with events here. Or why the major planetary bodies only cared about famous people or places. Strangely, the major planetary bodies somehow always do something that can be googled up later.

But then again I'm preaching to the choir here, so to speak. Most of you guys have been talking with him long enough to see this for what it is.

 

[Dutch]

While he's gone, he can conjure up an answer to this:









Liar.

Q4 2010 timeline October, November and December 2010
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?t=425&mforum=hddesign

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:12 am

Last edited by Dutch on Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:51 pm; edited 61 times in total

Are you serious? as long as I'm using the timelines, from the beginning of 2007, it is clear that I add each new date, underlying theme or related event in the first post of the timeline, while I also post the addition in a seperate post in the thread. by doing this the addition is logged with the date and time of the addition.

It has been explained here how it works.

the fact that you don't even know that evidently shows again that you have never read the timelines nor did you ever try to understand how it works. Yet you do seem to think you can have an opinion about it, you obviously don't know what you are talking about.

I have never altered a post after the fact, I have never deleted posts from the material or altered the content after the fact in the way Earl suggests. not here, not in the HDdesign material , nowhere on the internet.
You call me a liar?

shame on you,

an apology would suit you

 

[Dutch]

That was quite an ugly lie, Dutch.

you too, you better apologize

 

[Dutch]

I appreciate your honesty Blue, at least you know what it takes for a civil discussion

 

[Dutch]

If he was doing this research in a scientific manner, he should instead use the forum as a notebook and make a new post every time he has something to add. Then he could edit the initial post in each timeline thread as often as he wanted, as long as each line in that initial post contained links to the post in the thread that showed why (and more appropriately when) he made the change.

Well, it wasn't a planned action, it went how it went. I had to find ways to try to keep the loads of information comprehensable. The way I maintain the timelines are the easiest way and all info is logged in seperated posts. I agree with you that it could be done better if I had the change to do it over again.

 

[Dutch]

Ultimately, though, Dutch is not at all interested in approaching this scientifically. If he were, he would have abandoned HDD within a year of starting it because he would have realized his hit rate is no better than chance.

As a matter of fact I started to share this HDDesign material after a year of working with it, when I was finally convinced through all these 'coincidences' that showed up continuesly. I couldn't dismiss it no longer, that would have been an insult to my intelligence.

 

[Dutch]

Clearly, in contrast to his denial, Dutch alters his posts on his forum.
As far as Mister Earl's distrust for that HDD forum is concerned, I fully understand. Certainly now that it is clear that Dutch does indeed alter posts.

Perhaps, when Dutch returns he should explain/show what kind of alterations he makes to his posts there.

Earl is a coward, i've proposed to continue the discussion but he just ignored it. He didn't even answer me back than.

You are suggesting that I'm manipulative with my postings and alterations.

That's not true

I'm waitng for your apology

 

[dafydd]

Are you serious? as long as I'm using the timelines, from the beginning of 2007, it is clear that I add each new date, underlying theme or related event in the first post of the timeline, while I also post the addition in a seperate post in the thread. by doing this the addition is logged with the date and time of the addition.

It has been explained here how it works.

the fact that you don't even know that evidently shows again that you have never read the timelines nor did you ever try to understand how it works. Yet you do seem to think you can have an opinion about it, you obviously don't know what you are talking about.

I have never altered a post after the fact, I have never deleted posts from the material or altered the content after the fact in the way Earl suggests. not here, not in the HDdesign material , nowhere on the internet.
You call me a liar?

shame on you,

an apology would suit you

Give us a prediction.

 

[Dutch]

Give us a prediction.

I think this is about accusing me of altering posts and calling me a liar, so what exactly are you trying to say here?

 

[Paul]

I think this is about accusing me of altering posts and calling me a liar, so what exactly are you trying to say here?

I believe Dafydd is asking you to produce one single useful piece of actionable information before the event.

Of course you could keep avoiding any meaningful discussion and complaining while showing the same behaviour you complain about.

It's entirely up to you which you choose, but only one choice shows you have genuine intent.

 

[Dutch]

I believe Dafydd is asking you to produce one single useful piece of actionable information before the event.

Of course you could keep avoiding any meaningful discussion and complaining while showing the same behaviour you complain about.

It's entirely up to you which you choose, but only one choice shows you have genuine intent.

But paul,

that's exactly what i'm doing with the timelines, which most of you guys choose not to examine. I can't upload it in your brains, you have to do that yourselves.

if you have genuine intent, why don't you try to find out what this is about? the coincidenses that show up will convince even you