Hyper Dimensional Design

[Mister Earl]

Still waiting for you to prove that. You can't, instead you try to ridicule this material.

Actually, considering the rules of the forum, the onus is on you to prove your "hypothesis". I'm offering alternative scenarios that I say are equal to or greater than the accuracy of your system. I'm still waiting for you to prove otherwise, not that I actually expect you to ever be able to.

Oh, and as an aside, "proof" isn't word salad. You have to give us a testable hypothesis, that's step one. And in six or seven years, you still have not met the standards for step one. Do you see why we aren't taking your system seriously?

 

[Dutch]

So considering there's already a volcano in continuous eruption currently, I'm guessing you're preparing to retroactively predict the eruption that's already going on.

No I'm not, I consider this current eruption and the quake/tsunami earlier this week to be the result of the 'inwelling' during last weekend's HD tetrahdron timeframe.

Although there seems to be a relation to the HD Cube timeframe in November, it would appear to us as seperate events. Like I said i expect yellowstone, but the attention I have been giving this during the last couple of years makes it already less likely to materialize as a full blow. But its potentially there. I expect to post additional info once the timeframe is open, around November 13

 

[Mister Earl]

You mean once you have more information to retroactively predict. Instead of more word salad, Dutch, why don't you take care of step #1? It'd go a long ways towards showing you're taking this seriously.

 

[Dutch]

Actually, considering the rules of the forum, the onus is on you to prove your "hypothesis". I'm offering alternative scenarios that I say are equal to or greater than the accuracy of your system. I'm still waiting for you to prove otherwise, not that I actually expect you to ever be able to.

Oh, and as an aside, "proof" isn't word salad. You have to give us a testable hypothesis, that's step one. And in six or seven years, you still have not met the standards for step one. Do you see why we aren't taking your system seriously?

But mr. earl, I am showing it to you continuously. There's no other way to prove this. You can only have a sense of the validity of this HDdesign concept if you try for yourselves not based on this HDdesign principles.
You will not succeed.
If you could set up the proper set of rules to prove this inter-dimensional connectedness I will go for the 1 million challenge here instantly

 

[Mister Earl]

But mr. earl, I am showing it to you continuously.

You are showing us nothing. Give us a testable hypothesis. Anecdotes and retroactive predictions are not evidence. They are word salad. Nobody with a reasonable understanding of science could never misinterpret what you are giving us as evidence.

There's no other way to prove this. You can only have a sense of the validity of this HDdesign concept if you try for yourselves not based on this HDdesign principles.
You will not succeed.
If you could set up the proper set of rules to prove this inter-dimensional connectedness I will go for the 1 million challenge here instantly

There IS a way to prove it. The same way as everything else, the scientific method. Give us a testable hypothesis so we can confirm your idea. This necessarily HAS to be step one. Any effort otherwise until step one is completed is a waste of everybody's time.

 

[Dutch]

You mean once you have more information to retroactively predict. Instead of more word salad, Dutch, why don't you take care of step #1? It'd go a long ways towards showing you're taking this seriously.

No, its my experience that especially from the last 3 days on prior to a determined timeframe, suddenly related synchronicities and 'coincidences' are occurring that enables me to understand better what is about to happen in relation to the underlying themes that have already been identified for that timeframe.

I strongly recommend to review the timelines that i maintain in the HDdesign material, especially in relation to the moment of posting in relation to the determined timeframe. Its simply not true that I only post after the facts, you have to analyse the moments of posting or keep an eye on them 'live' ( day by day ), than you will notice it

 

[Paul]

Like I said i expect yellowstone, but the attention I have been giving this during the last couple of years makes it already less likely to materialize as a full blow. But its potentially there.

Another cheap excuse for being utterly incorrect and entirely useless; "It would have happened except that writing about supervolcanoes makes them shy".

 

[Dutch]

I want to add that the timelines are used this way:
each quarter of a year has a timeline on which info and dates are added. Each addition is logged in the thread with a seperate post in order to log the time/ date of posting. This must be clear otherwise it makes no sense

 

[Paul]

If you could set up the proper set of rules to prove this inter-dimensional connectedness I will go for the 1 million challenge here instantly

You're already sounding like a failed applicant. A variation of the "I would claim but my special power can't be tested/proved/seen by thinking people" excuse.

 

[Dutch]

There IS a way to prove it. The same way as everything else, the scientific method. Give us a testable hypothesis so we can confirm your idea. This necessarily HAS to be step one. Any effort otherwise until step one is completed is a waste of everybody's time.

Don't you understand that the currently accepted scientific method is insufficient to cope with possible inter-dimensional correlations and consciousness itself?

 

[Dutch]

Another cheap excuse for being utterly incorrect and entirely useless; "It would have happened except that writing about supervolcanoes makes them shy".

I'm sure it will become clear.

 

[Mister Earl]

Don't you understand that the currently accepted scientific method is insufficient to cope with possible inter-dimensional correlations and consciousness itself?

How do you know? Did you try? Why wouldn't it work? Because the scientific method relies on fact and evidence instead of confirmation bias and hearsay?

Quit making excuses, Dutch.

 

[Paul]

Don't you understand that the currently accepted scientific method is insufficient to cope with possible inter-dimensional correlations and consciousness itself?

Convenient isn't it.

You can write all kind of pseudo scientific nonsense but as soon as you are asked to prove anything, it's all too esoteric and nebulous to be understood by mere science.

 

[Dutch]

You're already sounding like a failed applicant. A variation of the "I would claim but my special power can't be tested/proved/seen by thinking people" excuse.

I am pretty much confident that a detailed analysis of the HDDesign material ( especially in relation to the moment of posting of the expected underlying themes and the actual events) will provide statistical details that will indicate there's indeed something 'odd' going on here.

 

[Paul]

I'm sure it will become clear.

It's already abundantly clear that you won't or can't offer any explanation of any mechanism of any use to anyone in any real world case.

 

[Paul]

I am pretty much confident that a detailed analysis of the HDDesign material ( especially in relation to the moment of posting of the expected underlying themes and the actual events) will provide statistical details that will indicate there's indeed something 'odd' going on here.

Pretty sure is no use to anyone, if you are making that claim it is up to you to produce a rigorous analysis which provides usable data.

 

[Dutch]

Convenient isn't it.

You can write all kind of pseudo scientific nonsense but as soon as you are asked to prove anything, it's all too esoteric and nebulous to be understood by mere science.

A few volunteers could do the job. I mean it, its all in the material that has been logged real time during the last couple of years. A detailed analysis in relation to the moments of posting and the actual events in our reality should give the data that is necesarry to give a 'scientifically' based opinion on this material. Its a big job but its possible, we talk about thousands of relevant posts

 

[Dutch]

It's already abundantly clear that you won't or can't offer any explanation of any mechanism of any use to anyone in any real world case.

It may amase you, but I agree with you

I don't know how it all works in a scientific way, but that doesn't mean it isn't true.

 

[Dutch]

Pretty sure is no use to anyone, if you are making that claim it is up to you to produce a rigorous analysis which provides usable data.

That's too much to cope with for me on my own. Why wouldn't others help me with this, if you trully want to know?

 

[Daylightstar]

The 'coincidenses' speak for themselves, giving 'confirmation' every time again. Not once or twice, but numerous times

'coincidenses' and 'confirmations'.
You having to place these words in quotes already indicate there is a problem with you using these words.
All constructed in your head.