You may be waiting a long time, Typicallucas. Dutch's typical style is to post his creative imaginings, and then to ignore questions. Those he does choose to answer, he'll use a confusing barrage of random scientific terms. If you press him for a definition or an explanation, he'll refuse to answer. Normally he'll tell you to simply sit back, read his predictions, then try to fit them in somewhere down the line. In his mind, that's proof enough. But of course it isn't.
That's why Dutch was banned from BAUT, despite his claims to the contrary. There, people with ATM ideas have 30 days to present their case. They are required to answer all questions. If, at the end of 30 days, if progress is being made, the thread can be extended. This was made to prevent threads like Dutchs. A claim is made, then unsupported, questions are ignored, and it becomes less a discussion about a theory, and more as free advertisement for the poster. That's pretty much what he's doing here.
Sorry, Dutch. Like it or not, you're making the extraordinary claim, here, and the onus is on YOU to prove it. Answering my questions would be a good start.
You know damn well that it has been DECIDED that the HDdesign material was debunked, but nobody has ever debunked it
30 days to PROVE inter-dimensional correlations?
Its a shame
HDDesign is NOT about exact predictions
I'm a little new to this topic, so what exactly is HDDesign if it is not about exact predictions? It can't be a science, because sciences (physics, chemistry, biology...ect) are about (among other things) being able to make predictions based on what we know about how the universe works. It can't be a branch of mathematics either because mathematics also has very accurate predictive abilities. So what are we really dealing with here beyond goat entrails and tea leaves?
I'm a little new to this topic, so what exactly is HDDesign if it is not about exact predictions? It can't be a science, because sciences (physics, chemistry, biology...ect) are about (among other things) being able to make predictions based on what we know about how the universe works. It can't be a branch of mathematics either because mathematics also has very accurate predictive abilities. So what are we really dealing with here beyond goat entrails and tea leaves?
No, I am not creating a second thread. If you want me to, I'll put my own random predictions here, and we can see the accuracy between mine and yours side-by-side. You aren't going to get me to leave you alone that easily.
Alternatively, you can make me shut up quite easily by proving HDD as real.
An awesome place to start might be the ten questions I referenced earlier. Which are pretty much the same ones as four years ago.
Dutch, re-read what I have highlighted.
You did not satisfactorily answer ANY of the hundreds of questions asked of you about HDD. You made, and continue to make NO progress.
Why do you keep posting here if you will not explain things that are asked of you?
June 2, 2007 - Balkan Karma, keep an eye on Mladic, Karadzic, Seslj etc. and those politically responsible for the Srebrenica massacre
Friday June 1, 1:19 AM
War crime suspect, Mladic's closest ally arrested
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/070531/1/48yby.html
Arrested Tolimir is third on the list, just after Mladic and Karadzic
'Mothers of Srebrenica' left Srebrenica on June 2 for a 40-hours bus ride to
Den Haag: The Netherlands charged for Srebrenica massacre!!!!
Srebrenica Relatives To Sue Netherlands, UN
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/06/9df8b3f2-a5ca-4780-8007-7a75bb6324d9.html
Srebrenica families sue Dutch state, U.N.
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL0437048320070604
Bosnia suspect attacks UN arrest
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6719741.stm
BBC: Netherlands sued over Srebrenica
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6721139.stm
Net tightens on fugitive Mladic
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6712903.stm
described element of Design: Mars at same position as during the 911 based 'control' triggerdate related to the Srebrenica massacre!
I'm a little new to this topic, so what exactly is HDDesign if it is not about exact predictions? It can't be a science, because sciences (physics, chemistry, biology...ect) are about (among other things) being able to make predictions based on what we know about how the universe works. It can't be a branch of mathematics either because mathematics also has very accurate predictive abilities. So what are we really dealing with here beyond goat entrails and tea leaves?
Dutch does exactly the same thing on other threads. He just posts and posts and posts, never answers questions and if he does its a mishmash of meaningless words..
I'd suggest this thread be closed for the simple reason it will go nowhere....forever
I have given answers and I am willing to explain I just don't accept people asking things again that has been discussed already without giving the references. I'm not going to do it over and over again. If I notice that one is doing serious research nI always respond.
Progress was made but you are just way to rigid to even consider it
I think you made a similar remark years ago. Have you monitored the timelines since than?
1.) Walk us through a sample "prediction" calculation session. Tell us where, how, and why you start where you do. Include math.
2.) Explain each of your 2d solar system overlays, how synchrocities are calculated, and why and how a 2d overlay works perfectly fine for 3d space.
2a.) (Late addition) Explain how you calculate when the planets are in proper alignment for a given overlay.
2b.) (Late addition) Explain why synchrosities have a few days leeway as far as counting hits goes. I.E. Why wouldn't the predicted event only happen when the planets are EXACTLY in the right place?
3.) Explain the mechanism, if known, that causes the mere positioning of celestial bodies to affect global events on Earth. If not, why?
4.) Explain why some celestial objects affect events or people on Earth and why not others.
5.) Explain why HD design affects famous people and places and nobody or nothing else
6.) Explain whether or not your specific interpretation of HD design is better than guesswork and random chance.
7.) Explain the difference between HD design and pareidolia.
8.) Explain to me what confirmation bias is, and how you avoid it during your divinations, if at all.
This'll be a good start. Give me some solid answers, and a testable hypothesis that anyone can do, and in one post you'll make more headway than you have in the last four or so years.
Have you given us a testable prediction yet?
No. Just vague musings.
1.) Answers? I don't think that word means what you think it means. You haven't given a solid answer to any of my questions. Just word salad.
2.) You'll only answer questions to people doing "Serious research"? Why should anyone else bother with "Serious research" when you refuse to?
Have you given us a testable prediction yet?
No. Just vague musings.