Hyper Dimensional Design

[dafydd]

I predict that something will happen around May 5 next year.

 

[Dutch]

So do it mr Earl. you are saying the same thing as years ago and ignoring the numerous 'coincidences' and sunchronicities in this material. Your methods are far to rigid in order to test this kind of stuff. This is about indirect indications of HDDesign as connected to our reality. I told you back than and I tell you know again: you have to keep an eye on the timelines and how knew themes and dates occur. Have you done that the last couple of years? I geuss not

 

[Dutch]

I mean it mr Earl, post your expectations in a seperate thread. continue to do so for an extended period of time. Do it

 

[Mister Earl]

My expectations, nor my requests for proof have not changed. But I'll humor your and post a short list. If you can address them without utilizing weasel words, redefinitions of common terms, and above all, precisely, then we can get into the nitty-gritty.

1.) Walk us through a sample "prediction" calculation session. Tell us where, how, and why you start where you do. Include math.

2.) Explain each of your 2d solar system overlays, how synchrocities are calculated, and why and how a 2d overlay works perfectly fine for 3d space.

2a.) (Late addition) Explain how you calculate when the planets are in proper alignment for a given overlay.

2b.) (Late addition) Explain why synchrosities have a few days leeway as far as counting hits goes. I.E. Why wouldn't the predicted event only happen when the planets are EXACTLY in the right place?

3.) Explain the mechanism, if known, that causes the mere positioning of celestial bodies to affect global events on Earth. If not, why?

4.) Explain why some celestial objects affect events or people on Earth and why not others.

5.) Explain why HD design affects famous people and places and nobody or nothing else

6.) Explain whether or not your specific interpretation of HD design is better than guesswork and random chance.

7.) Explain the difference between HD design and pareidolia.

8.) Explain to me what confirmation bias is, and how you avoid it during your divinations, if at all.


This'll be a good start. Give me some solid answers, and a testable hypothesis that anyone can do, and in one post you'll make more headway than you have in the last four or so years.

 

[Dutch]

No mr Earl, we have walked that way before. You said you can do better so just show it

 

[Mister Earl]

No mr Earl, we have walked that way before. You said you can do better so just show it

I know I asked them before, so that part is indeed a repeat from a few years ago, but you haven't answered them yet. That's why I'm asking them again.

But if you wanna go head to head, we'll have to establish some rules. We'll need intermediaries to do the judging. Here's what I think: Let's take a 30 day period, and make a single prediction per day. Each prediction is only valid for THAT day, and it must also include a what, a where, and a why.

For example: May 9th. Transportation problem in the United States' midwest due to a weather related crisis.

Does this sound acceptable so far? What changes would you like, if any? More specific? Less specific?

 

[Dutch]

Mr. Earl, how many times did I explain that HDDesign is NOT about exact predictions? I don't SEE the future.

Your 30 days is a BAUT thing and is useless.

I share this stuf when it comes, how do you judge a coincidence or synchronicity?

by experiencing yourselves. Keep an eye on the timelines and my postings.

In the meanwhile you can do your own thing in a seperate thread and you will understand the difference

 

[Mister Earl]

Mr. Earl, how many times did I explain that HDDesign is NOT about exact predictions? I don't SEE the future.

Your 30 days is a BAUT thing and is useless.

I share this stuf when it comes, how do you judge a coincidence or synchronicity?

by experiencing yourselves. Keep an eye on the timelines and my postings.

In the meanwhile you can do your own thing in a seperate thread and you will understand the difference

So in other words, you refuse, again, to answer the questions I listed, and also the challenge. I'm not surprised. Dutch, the only thing that can verify your HDD is the scientific method. Your method utilizes nothing more than confirmation bias. This is not scientific, nor accurate.

 

[Typicallucas]

I hope I'm not intruding on a private argument. But I would like to know Dutch's answers to the 10 questions listed above... I think they are pretty reasonable things to ask...

Synchronicity is interesting, but (speaking personally) if I want to determine if coincidences are meaningful or not I take a step back and test my conclusions with some critical thinking.

 

[Mister Earl]

You may be waiting a long time, Typicallucas. Dutch's typical style is to post his creative imaginings, and then to ignore questions. Those he does choose to answer, he'll use a confusing barrage of random scientific terms. If you press him for a definition or an explanation, he'll refuse to answer. Normally he'll tell you to simply sit back, read his predictions, then try to fit them in somewhere down the line. In his mind, that's proof enough. But of course it isn't.

That's why Dutch was banned from BAUT, despite his claims to the contrary. There, people with ATM ideas have 30 days to present their case. They are required to answer all questions. If, at the end of 30 days, if progress is being made, the thread can be extended. This was made to prevent threads like Dutchs. A claim is made, then unsupported, questions are ignored, and it becomes less a discussion about a theory, and more as free advertisement for the poster. That's pretty much what he's doing here.

Sorry, Dutch. Like it or not, you're making the extraordinary claim, here, and the onus is on YOU to prove it. Answering my questions would be a good start.

 

[Paul]

I hope I'm not intruding on a private argument.

Don't worry, it's not a private argument, it's more that some of us have an odd masochistic attachment to this thread.

But I would like to know Dutch's answers to the 10 questions listed above... I think they are pretty reasonable things to ask...

You're not the only one. It seems, however, that Dutch does not want to explain anything to anyone; it's been that way for over 3 years now.

Synchronicity is interesting, but (speaking personally) if I want to determine if coincidences are meaningful or not I take a step back and test my conclusions with some critical thinking.

Apparently that gets in the way.

 

[Dutch]

I hope I'm not intruding on a private argument. But I would like to know Dutch's answers to the 10 questions listed above... I think they are pretty reasonable things to ask...

Synchronicity is interesting, but (speaking personally) if I want to determine if coincidences are meaningful or not I take a step back and test my conclusions with some critical thinking.

These kinds of questions have been answered partly in this thread and most of them at BAUT forum. I am not going to do it over again, but I'm willing to explain further when you refer to specific answers I have already given. Mr. Earl has access to BAUT forum so he can give you the links.

 

[Dutch]

You may be waiting a long time, Typicallucas. Dutch's typical style is to post his creative imaginings, and then to ignore questions. Those he does choose to answer, he'll use a confusing barrage of random scientific terms. If you press him for a definition or an explanation, he'll refuse to answer. Normally he'll tell you to simply sit back, read his predictions, then try to fit them in somewhere down the line. In his mind, that's proof enough. But of course it isn't.

That's why Dutch was banned from BAUT, despite his claims to the contrary. There, people with ATM ideas have 30 days to present their case. They are required to answer all questions. If, at the end of 30 days, if progress is being made, the thread can be extended. This was made to prevent threads like Dutchs. A claim is made, then unsupported, questions are ignored, and it becomes less a discussion about a theory, and more as free advertisement for the poster. That's pretty much what he's doing here.

Sorry, Dutch. Like it or not, you're making the extraordinary claim, here, and the onus is on YOU to prove it. Answering my questions would be a good start.

You know damn well that it has been DECIDED that the HDdesign material was debunked, but nobody has ever debunked it

30 days to PROVE inter-dimensional correlations?

Its a shame

 

[Dutch]

You can prove HDDesign is nonsense with starting your own thread with future expectations, monitor them and continue to do so for an extended period of time. Than we will discuss the differences and you will start to understand that HDDesign is valid

 

[Paul]

Dutch, if you spent as much time answering questions as you do avoiding them, we might actually get somewhere.

 

[Mister Earl]

These kinds of questions have been answered partly in this thread and most of them at BAUT forum. I am not going to do it over again, but I'm willing to explain further when you refer to specific answers I have already given. Mr. Earl has access to BAUT forum so he can give you the links.

You want me to post a link to the BAUT forum where you spent just as much time not answering the same questions?

You can prove HDDesign is nonsense with starting your own thread with future expectations, monitor them and continue to do so for an extended period of time. Than we will discuss the differences and you will start to understand that HDDesign is valid

The onus is on YOU to prove your claim. You have repeatedly failed to do so. I've offered a simple test both you and I can do. Are you refusing to take part? Why?

 

[The Man]

You know damn well that it has been DECIDED that the HDdesign material was debunked, but nobody has ever debunked it

30 days to PROVE inter-dimensional correlations?

Its a shame

Dutch you have consistently failed to show any dimensions beyond the one temporal dimension you calculate your post diction "correlations" in or that you even understand what constitutes a dimension. No one need debunk claims you simply have not and apparently can not demonstrate as being, even the very least bit, valid.

You can prove HDDesign is nonsense with starting your own thread with future expectations, monitor them and continue to do so for an extended period of time. Than we will discuss the differences and you will start to understand that HDDesign is valid

Again Dutch you prove it is nonsense yourself as your calculations are entirely one dimensional and you have failed to show any “design” even in just that one dimension. What you have shown is how much you enjoy placing your own personal interpretations onto a very limited sampling of reported world events that you seem to enjoy focusing on to the exclusion of other reported world events.

 

[Mister Earl]

*crickets*

 

[Dutch]

Have you started your thread yet Mr. Earl? I can't find it.

 

[Mister Earl]

Have you started your thread yet Mr. Earl? I can't find it.

No, I am not creating a second thread. If you want me to, I'll put my own random predictions here, and we can see the accuracy between mine and yours side-by-side. You aren't going to get me to leave you alone that easily.

Alternatively, you can make me shut up quite easily by proving HDD as real.

An awesome place to start might be the ten questions I referenced earlier. Which are pretty much the same ones as four years ago.