Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

irrelevant

 

[cienaños]

I just read some off the top of this gigantic thread, so if this has been addressed, nude it and drape athis on it.

The tongue lashing that I see a lot of from some self-described athiests on these threads, is equal in intensity to the tongue lashing I see from some self-described believers of pick your tchotchke.

The lot of you are raving mad.

 

[The Man]

I think you can at least fugure out now when to switch it on

Not yet, Uranus the CH (and TV, since Crap Happens on TV) messenger is not in the right orbital position and such action could result in a dimensional design hype warning. Wait… wait for it….

…Ok now .

If you want to tempt fate and ignore the dimensional design hype warnings by turning your TV on at any time you feel like, you put us all at risk of the possibly potential almost certainly likely chance of some calamity befalling us on some future date that the power of dimensional design hype is more than capable of letting us know, after it happens.

 

[The Man]

I just read some off the top of this gigantic thread, so if this has been addressed, nude it and drape athis on it.

The tongue lashing that I see a lot of from some self-described athiests on these threads, is equal in intensity to the tongue lashing I see from some self-described believers of pick your tchotchke.

The lot of you are raving mad.

Well, thank you for joining us in that.

Welcome to the thread and the forum.

 

[dafydd]

Hans van Mierlo, Dutch foreign minister at time of fall of Srebrenica, dies at age 78
Van Mierlo, who died late Thursday, was foreign minister in 1995 when outnumbered and outgunned Dutch peacekeepers looked on helplessly as Bosnian Serb forces overran the Srebrenica enclave in Bosnia and went on to massacre some 8,000 Muslim men.
May I remind you that Earth is at same orbital position as during Milosevic was taken out
That would be 'Milosevic' at midpoint on a similar timeframe as the timeframe between the 2 Venus Transits, with the exit of van Mierlo during the current timeframe we see the NIOD report handed over to PM Kok in mid March 2002 ( confidential):

see timeline here:
http://m.europa-nu.nl/9353000/1/j9vviaekvp0oeyh/vh8lnhrp8wsg

In April 2002, the Dutch government resigned after the publication of research into the events around the fall of the Bosnian enclave of Srebrenica, which was under the protection of Dutch peacekeepers, in 1995. Trade unions representing military personnel have called for the resignation of the army leadership at the time and for a parliamentary inquiry, which has now been launched.
In mid-April 2002, the government led by Prime Minister Wim Kok resigned following publication of the findings of research by the Dutch Institute for War Documentation (Nederland Instituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie, NIOD) into the events surrounding the fall in 1995 of the Bosnian Muslim enclave of Srebrenica, which was being protected by Dutch peacekeeping troops, and the subsequent massacre of inhabitants. The government was a coalition of the social democratic Labour Party (Partij van de Arbeid, PvdA), the liberal Party for Freedom and Democracy (Vereniging voor Vrijheid en Democratie, VVD) and the social liberal Democraten 66 (D66).
Mr Kok had been Prime Minister at the time of the events in Srebrenica and, accepting responsibility for the consequences, resigned along with the rest of the cabinet, several of whom had also been in government at the time. A general election was already due to be held in May 2002, and until then the current government will remain in place in a caretaker capacity.
Although the cabinet's resignation stems from a will to accept political accountability, the report into the Srebrenica affair found that, while the ministers and secretaries of state were indeed responsible at a political level, the leadership of the army withheld relevant information from them with respect to Srebrenica. Consequently, the General Federation of Military Staff (Algemene Federatie van Militair Personeel, AFMP), the trade union for military personnel affiliated to the Dutch Trade Union Federation (Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging, FNV), is demanding that the army leadership responsible at the time should resign. The AFMP chair, Ton Heerts, is calling for the public prosecutor to investigate if the former commanding officer, Hans Couzy and the rest of the army leadership can be held liable under criminal law for the events that unfolded in Srebrenica in 1995.
According to the NIOD report, the truth about the Srebrenica situation was knowingly withheld by army officers. A deliberate attempt was made to restrict the amount of information disclosed and, where possible, to sweep aside disagreeable subjects. Commanding officer Couzy, the report states, destroyed his personal archives, despite knowing how important the information was at the time and would be later. According to the AFMP union, the deliberate actions of the former army leadership have tarnished the image of Dutchbat, the Dutch military contingent in Bosnia.
ACOM, the military services union affiliated to the Christian Trade Union Federation (Christelijk Nationaal Vakverbond, CNV), also believes that the conclusions of the NIOD report should have consequences for the military leadership. Their actions, ACOM claims, have left Dutchbat saddled with the blame, even though the lower-level military personnel cannot be accused of any wrongdoing. Dutchbat must be cleared of all blame.
The parliamentary inquiry demanded by the unions and deemed desirable by politicians has now been initiated by the latter, and a number of high-ranking military officers involved at the time have either resigned or been dismissed.
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2002/04/inbrief/nl0204105n.htm

A Mandate Yet to be Faithfully Executed
The Hague Tribunal was established to deliver justice and the historical record related to the crimes, (grave violations of international humanitarian law), committed during the conflict(s) in the lands of the former Yugoslavia. This United Nations Security Council, (UNSC), mandate shaped and adopted during my tenure as BiH’s Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN on behalf of the Republic of BiH, was not limited by either time or the nationality of those who might be investigated or prosecuted. Certainly there is no limiting of scope to the actions of the leaders or citizens of the former Yugoslav states alone. Nonetheless, it appears to many that the Tribunal has been steered clear of investigations that might expose culpability that is reflective on the big powers or potentially embarrassing, perhaps inconvenient.
And we should here remind of another mandate adopted by both the UNSC and NATO: to make Srebrenica, Zepa, Gorazde and three other BiH population centers into “safe areas” protected by UN peacekeepers on the ground and ultimately shielded by NATO air power from above, “protected zones”. While such mandate may have been made moot in the eyes of some when Srebrenica and Zepa were overrun, the basic legal responsibility cannot be extinguished until the UN and NATO complete an objective investigation as to whether these “safe areas” were undermined by premeditated and/or reckless action.
Netherlands’ Peacekeepers in Enclave Also Abandoned by Allies?
From almost the date of Srebrenica and Zepa’s fall, I have questioned and asked for answers. Then Dutch Defense Minister Jorvis Voorhoeve has now also put his suspicions clearly on the record, on the side of those demanding answers, (from October 22, 2009 BBC interview of Mr. Voorhoeve linked below):
“I know from intelligence sources that there were already Serb decisions to take the three Eastern enclaves among which was Srebrenica. Those decisions were taken probably in May and June – two months before.”
Joris Voorhoeve further alleges that the international community knew the attack was coming.
“Two security council members had knowledge that the attack was coming. I’m not saying they had knowledge the attack would be followed by mass murder. In any case they did not do anything with this knowledge.”
—–
On the eve before Srebrenica was to fall, I met with then Defense Minister Voorhoeve as well as then Foreign Minister Hans van Mierlo to urge them to confront the oncoming Serbian onslaught, (intelligence of which Voorhoeve had shared with me some weeks before). The Dutch UN peacekeeping troops in Srebrenica had to rely upon NATO air power to fend off any attack by Serbian military vastly superior in ground troops and weapons. (The local defense forces were largely disarmed with their heavy weapons placed under UN control). Of course, both the Srebrenica residents and Dutch peacekeepers were dependent upon a reliable response by UN and NATO commanders to turn the “dual key” launching the nearby NATO planes.
Staying in almost hourly communication, the night before the fall Voorhoeve called to inform me that he had in fact formally demanded NATO air support. He also announced the same decision to his Dutch citizens over live TV broadcast. The NATO air strikes never came, and the most critical question as to why not has never been answered for the benefit of the UN’s and NATO’s credibility as well as justice and the rights of the victims. Voorhoeve also claims that no credible answer has been provided:
“Why were his calls for air strikes the night before ignored? And why was there no action taken more than a month previously, when – according to Mr. Voorhoeve – the Serbs’ intentions to attack were known? (Same BBC interview linked below).
from: The implications of the Butcher’s trial
http://europeancourier.org/op/2009/10/27/the-implications-of-the-butcher’s-trial/
I think I have said it dozens of times, but to remind you:
eventually HDDesign will unveil who's responsible for this drama, besides the Dutch gouvernment. Air support was refused and that decission has been taken on authority.
The truth will come out...it HAS to come out
it IS Venus based!!! 8 years or 13 Venus years in earth days, the timeframe between the 2 Venus Transits of our times
To make it clear:
NIOD report about Srebrenica given to Prime Minister Wim Kok, mid March 2002
8 years later or 13 Venus years in Earth days or the timeframe between the 2 Venus transits of our times:
Hans van Mierlo dies, Minister of Foreighn Affairs at the time of the Srebrenica massacre. ( March 11, 2010 )
At midpoint or similar as on Venus Transit Midpoint:
Milosevic died in his prison in The Hague, The Netherlands ( March 11, 2006 )
This Srebrenica karma is 'expressing' again
Again we have a fallen gouvernment in The Netherlands. Pim Fortuyn was killed on May 6, 2002. Elections are coming up...
Geert Wilders could be considwered the new Pim Fortuyn.
We have to acknowledge our responsibily for the Srebrenica massacre or we will have to learn it the hard way.
Also: Who's responsible for the decission to refuse air support asked by the Dutch soldiers on the ground?
Hans van Mierlo in this interview:
http://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/Ho...-n-collectieve-schuld-geweest-aan.99481.lynkx

This is about the air support that was refused so Dutch-bat was unable to defend Srebrenica. Hans van Mierlo expresses his ideas here that he thought there were indeed secret agreements between Mladic and Janvier and perhaps Jacques Chirac, French President during the Srebrenica Massacre.


Here he says that Chirac proposed to kick the serbs out of Srebrenica again. Everybody thought Chirac was nuts and Hans thought Chirac proposed this because of he felt guilty to what has happened in Srebrenica
This is a very interesting development.

Jacques Chirac....Who's responsible?
I have said numerous times that these patterns will eventually unveil who's responsible for the Srebrenica Massacre.........
I thought that the 'echo' timeframe back in 2002 could give a hint....
The Srebrenica massacre started on July 11, 1995 with the fall of Srebrenica and lasted for several days of mass executions of Muslim man and boys.
During the Srebrenica Karma 'echo' of 2002, with Earth at the same orbital position as during the Srebrenica massacre, this has happened that indicates the answer to who else is responsible for the Srebrenica Massacre:
On 14 July 2002, during Bastille Day celebrations, Chirac survived an assassination attempt by a lone gunman with a rifle hidden in a guitar case. The would-be assassin fired a shot toward the presidential motorcade, before being overpowered by bystanders. The gunman, Maxime Brunerie, underwent psychiatric testing; the violent far-right group with which he was associated, Unité Radicale, was then administratively dissolved.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Chirac
HDDesign is stronger than any lie
Hans van Mierlo was right but he couldn't prove it.....HDDesign confirms though.
Synchronicity:
So we talk about the Srebrenica Karma 'echo' in 2002......
With Earth at the same orbital poition in 2002 of the start of this Srebrenica drama:
On July 10, 2002:
At a Sotheby's auction, Peter Paul Rubens' painting "The Massacre of the Innocents" (first version) is sold for £49.5million (US$76.2 million) to Kenneth Thomson, 2nd Baron Thomson of Fleet.
Massacre of the Innocents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Massacre_of_the_Innocents
Srebrenica Karma:
May 5, 2002 – In the second round of the French presidential election, Jacques Chirac is reelected.
May 6, 2002 – In the Netherlands, politician Pim Fortuyn is assassinated.
Mladic is still out there because there are responsible people who don't want him to testify.....

More old news,any predictions for us? Going to take the bet about Yellowstone?

 

[Paulhoff]

irrelevant

Yes, everything you post is irrelevant.

Paul

 

[Paul]

I have said numerous times that these patterns will eventually unveil who's responsible for the Srebrenica Massacre.........

It seems to me that we should be looking for someone who meets a few basic criteria; what we need is someone who is Dutch, obsessed with Srebrenica, displays an apparently unwarranted degree of personal guilt and whose actions in pushing for collective accountability would appear to be an attempt to lessen their own inevitable guilt.

I don't know where we'll find someone like that...

 

[Broes]

I have found a truely weird coincidence...

Hyperdimensional design is geared alot towards Dutch news...
Our Hyperdimensional design guru's name is Dutch
Our Hyperdimensional design guru's nationality is also Dutch!

This is to much to be just an incident... It must be design!

 

[Blue Mountain]

I have found a truely weird coincidence...

Hyperdimensional design is geared alot towards Dutch news...
Our Hyperdimensional design guru's name is Dutch
Our Hyperdimensional design guru's nationality is also Dutch!

This is to much to be just an incident... It must be design!

One could argue that HDD applies just as much in Great Britain, Russia, India, Thailand, and Canada as it does in the Netherlands; it's just that Dutch is "on the ground" to catch all the local manifestations.

Or that it's all in Dutch's mind. Occam's Razor and all that.

 

[Dutch]

Rosetta Flies By "Something" Very Strange ....
from the enterprisemission:
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Rosetta/Rosetta-analysis-test.htm

Based on the results of our completely independent research, I would say Alford's "exploded planet cult ... " is quite alive and well ... and, among other places, living "high off the taxpayers" both in NASA and in ESA ....
Looking at this remarkable Rosetta comparison (above), one is definitely struck by the eerie resemblance between "the inanimate architecture of an ancient, massive platform ... flying through space ..." and the features of a living symbol ... "a falcon metaphor for a far more ancient inanimate form ... known formally as 'the distant one' ... flying through the skies of Ancient Egypt ...."
That such a mythological overlay is more than "coincidental," is the thesis of much of Alford's work: which is, that the ancient mythological images and "textual codes" underlying all Egyptian Civilization (such as those attached to "Horus"... ) and the Sumerian's equally striking "sky imagery," are actually metaphorical "explanations" of potentially real, incredibly ancient personages and events ... from that long-lost period of pre and post cataclysm solar-system history ...."
And Horus was, of course, the son of OSIRIS.
What better that "an OSIRIS camera" ... to take "his" close-up imagery now ...?
If Ancient Egypt was the "metaphorical map" of people and events from an even more "unimaginable time ..." -- endlessly relived and replayed in the mythology of much more "recent" ancient civilizations here on Earth -- this could well answer our key question:
How did ESA KNOW before they sent the mission ... that Steins was, in actuality, an artificial platform!?
Answer:
Because of the current existence of Alford's "exploded planet cult ..." which (again, somehow ...) provided ESA with access to far more ancient (and far less "ambiguous" ...) solar system information ...
Perhaps in the form of carefully preserved texts ... even actual images (!) ....
Whatever form this information took, it apparently (judging by the results) faithfully recorded snippets of real "ancient solar system events ..." and even incredibly useful navigation data, such as possibly ... exact ephemerides (locations ...) of some surviving ancient spacecraft orbiting the Sun ... masquerading as "mere asteroids" even now ....
If any of this speculation is true ... it could finally, neatly, explain the otherwise "almost impossible-to-understand" overall Rosetta Mission Plan ... the "extended, tortuous course" that ESA (claimed it) was forced to send Rosetta on ... just to reach "its" back-up comet, Comet 67P/Churyumov- Gerasimenko.
In truth, because Steins currently orbits "ten degrees above the solar system plane ...", any clandestine mission would HAVE HAD to involve such a critical set of complex maneuvers after leaving Earth ... all to effect THAT crucial, unavoidable "plane change" to reach Steins' orbit.
And, "plane changes" in interplanetary travel are EXTREMELY expensive -- in terms of fuel.
So, if Steins was the Primary Mission all along, then the selection of a second comet, ALSO orbiting well above the solar system plane, was ESSENTIAL to the cover story ... with one big loophole--
If an "alternate comet" was needed as a target (after "Comet Wirtanen" had been originally selected and then scrapped, forced by the delay) ... why did ESA choose another comet ALSO in "a highly inclined orbit?" Every extra day spent on the ground, after being fabricated, was an extra day on which some onboard random electronic system could literally break down (fail ...) -- resulting potentially in a later mission loss!
So--
Why add EXTRA, "risky" time (~11 years ...) -- hundreds of millions of extra miles traveling through space, looping past planets ... once ... twice ... three times! -- all, just to rendezvous with another "highly-inclined comet" (Wirtanen has an inclination of almost 12 degrees ...)?
When--
Much more accessible comets orbit much closer to the central solar system plane ...?!
Instead of eleven years ... such an alternative "in plane" comet rendezvous could have been achieved in just a couple years ....
So, why add the highly risky "extra time" ...?
Unless you HAD to--
In order, in a MOST undercover way ... to fly-by Steins!

As I have explained earlier with the 'communication' post, Pi seems to be expressed with these 'events' in space:
In order to 'express' Pi between 2 events you have to devide the timeframe in between twice with Pi. Than you have to deduct that result from the timeframe and devide the remaining by 2. Add the result to one of this halfs and you get 2 points in between that express Pi together.
read this post here first:
'Communication'
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=9548&mforum=hddesign#9548
As it was Pi day last Sunday I thought to check the awakenings trigger date that appears to be around September 5, 2008 and I posted it here on Monday at HDDesign forum:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=10233&mforum=hddesign#10233
Whit this I was reminded about the Rosetta flyby again and I decided to read the Enterprise article about this very strange object in space
Richard Hoagland said:

such as possibly ... exact ephemerides (locations ...) of some surviving ancient spacecraft orbiting the Sun ... masquerading as "mere asteroids" even now ...

At this point I thought to give Asteroid Steins a closer look and because it was Pi day that made me check the triggerdates, i decided to apply the Pi-correlation as first unveiled with the spacecraft 'Deep Impact' related events in space as explained in the 'communication' post.
Steins orbit is 1326,736 Earth days
1326,7 / Pi / Pi = 134.4 Earth days
1327,7 - 134,4 = 1192,3 Earth days
The 2 Pi points are

1192,3 / 2 = 596,2 Days
and
596,1 +134, 4 = 730,5 Earth days
THAT'S EXACTLY 2 EARTH YEARS OR THE SAME ORBITAL POSTION OF EARTH.
EXACTLY IN THE SAME WAY AS WITH THIS 'DEEP IMPACT COMMUNICATION' AS SHOWN HERE IN THE HDDESIGN MATERIAL
In other words:
Earth's orbit is encoded in Steins orbit by Pi

Whatever Steins really is, or what has happened to it, fact is that Steins is now orbitting our Sun with an orbit that marks our own Earth's orbit in an Intelligent way.
So now that the 2 Pi points are determined as a timeframe of 596 and 730 days, we shoulg keep an eye on these timeframes in relation to Rosetta's fly by of 'asteroid' Steins.
That means 596 and 730 days after the flyby is April 24, 2010 and September 5, 2010 and I will put these 2 dates on the timelines of Q2 and Q3 2010
With 1 of the Pi points marking Earth's orbit, I decided to give the otherone a closer look : This timeframe of 596 days prior to Rosetta's fly by gives around January 18, 2007
That timeframe was mentioned on the timeline first half 2007:

January 18, 2007 - Deep Impact on a 911 based inspiralling (563 days)
Dwarf planet 'becoming a comet'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6268799.stm
Deep Impact Galactica, posted on January 18: http://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/deepimpact-galactica.htm
another Deep Impact event in space:
China Tests Anti-Satellite Weapon
http://quickstart.clari.net/voa/art/fj/2007-01-18-voa73.html
China test sparks space arms fears
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6278867.stm
Concern over China's missile test
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6276543.stm
US demands answers on China test
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6281247.stm

The Pi dates are mentioned on the timelines here:
Q2 2010: http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about401-hddesign.html
Q3 2010: http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about408-hddesign.html
note that aother 'strange object' shows up around January 18, 2007:
Dwarf planet 'becoming a comet'
An unusual dwarf planet discovered in the outer Solar System could be en route to becoming the brightest comet ever known.

Artist's impression: 2003 EL61 is a strange object
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6268799.stm

 

[Wolrab]

Big deal. My unidimensional physics predicted this on the Space Shuttle Challenger timeline. No dividing by 2 or using that silly pi.

 

[GenghisKhan]

I don't even know where to start. This reminds me of that South Park conspiracy episode where I believe Cartman blames Kyle for the 9/11 attacks.

Yes, nothing like taking events that happened and making up math to correlate them. >.<

 

[Paul]

Is Ad Hoaglandum a recognised logical fallacy?

 

[The Man]

I don’t think so, but Agument Via Hoaglandic Homunculus should be. Like an argument from authority, but just smaller (in authority).

 

[Dutch]

An unusual dwarf planet discovered in the outer Solar System could be en route to becoming the brightest comet ever known.
2003 EL61 is a large, dense, rugby-ball-shaped hunk of rock with a fast rotation rate.
--snip--
But it is extremely unusual: spinning on its axis every four hours, it has developed an elongated shape.

from the link in the previous post:
Dwarf planet 'becoming a comet'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6268799.stm
extremely unusual?
I thought to give Rosetta's final destination a look:
Comet 67/C-G
Sixty-one images of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko were taken with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 on board the Hubble Space Telescope on 11-12 March 2003. The HST's sharp vision enabled astronomers to isolate the comet's nucleus from the coma. The images showed that the nucleus measures five by three kilometres and has an ellipsoidal (rugby ball) shape. It rotates once in approximately 12 hours.
"Although 67P/C-G is roughly three times larger than the original Rosetta target, its elongated shape should make landing on its nucleus feasible, now that measures are in place to adapt the lander package to the new configuration before next year's launch," said Dr. Philippe Lamy of the Laboratoire d'Astronomie Spatiale in France.
http://doublestar.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=14615

 

[dafydd]

from the link in the previous post:
Dwarf planet 'becoming a comet'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6268799.stm
extremely unusual?
I thought to give Rosetta's final destination a look:
Comet 67/C-G
Sixty-one images of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko were taken with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 on board the Hubble Space Telescope on 11-12 March 2003. The HST's sharp vision enabled astronomers to isolate the comet's nucleus from the coma. The images showed that the nucleus measures five by three kilometres and has an ellipsoidal (rugby ball) shape. It rotates once in approximately 12 hours.
"Although 67P/C-G is roughly three times larger than the original Rosetta target, its elongated shape should make landing on its nucleus feasible, now that measures are in place to adapt the lander package to the new configuration before next year's launch," said Dr. Philippe Lamy of the Laboratoire d'Astronomie Spatiale in France.
http://doublestar.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=14615

So what?

 

[Dutch]

At this point I thought to give Asteroid Steins a closer look and because it was Pi day that made me check the triggerdates, i decided to apply the Pi-correlation as first unveiled with the spacecraft 'Deep Impact' related events in space as explained in the 'communication' post.
Steins orbit is 1326,736 Earth days
1326,7 / Pi / Pi = 134.4 Earth days
1327,7 - 134,4 = 1192,3 Earth days
The 2 Pi points are

1192,3 / 2 = 596,2 Days
and
596,1 +134, 4 = 730,5 Earth days
THAT'S EXACTLY 2 EARTH YEARS OR THE SAME ORBITAL POSTION OF EARTH.
EXACTLY IN THE SAME WAY AS WITH THIS 'DEEP IMPACT COMMUNICATION' AS SHOWN HERE IN THE HDDESIGN MATERIAL
In other words:
Earth's orbit is encoded in Steins orbit by Pi

Whatever Steins really is, or what has happened to it, fact is that Steins is now orbitting our Sun with an orbit that marks our own Earth's orbit in an Intelligent way.

So the Pi point of Steins' orbit is determined as 730.5 Earth days or exactly 2 Earth years of 365.25 days
After the flyby of 'asteroid' Steins the Rosetta spacecraft continued its mission and next event on its mission was an Earth flyby on its way towards asteroid Lutetia.
This Earth flyby happened on November 13, 2009 and was the last of 4 planet flyby's of rosetta spacecraft.
The previous flyby ( the third) happened on November 13, 2007!!!!
exactly 2 Earth years!!!!
Rosetta is confirming this Intelligent Pi based correlation between Earth and Stein's orbits right after its encounter with Steins by an Earth Flyby exactly 2 years later than the previous one, exactly the same timeframe as based on the Pi point of Steins' orbit.
This is the same Pi based Design as with the Deep Impact/Epoxi mission and the lunar impact mission, as identified and explained in the HDDesign material with previous posts.
With these 'manmade' events in space as expressed with rosetta spacecraft, we are 'communicating' that the Intelligent correlations with Earth in relation to Steins are understood.
Its so obvious and clear....and its shows up in the HDDesign material just like that, instantly after an initial synchronicity....again showing that 'we' are 'communicating' with our current missions in space based on the same identified Geometry as with the Deep Impact and Lunar Impact missions.....its so profound......
To think that this is just a coincidense is insane
This is '2010 the year that we make contact'......
and we are 'talking', whether we are aware of it or not

 

[Paulhoff]

This is '2010 the year that we make contact'......
and we are 'talking', whether we are aware of it or not

How convenient for you.

Paul

 

[Paul]

This is '2010 the year that we make contact'......

You do know what fiction means, don't you?

 

[dafydd]

To think that this is just a coincidense is insane
This is '2010 the year that we make contact'......
and we are 'talking', whether we are aware of it or not

To think that it is anything but a coincidence is insane.