Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

Give us a clue, what do you think you explained before?

that the HD platonic solids don't have shape, only geometrically determined positions on an orbit

 

[Paulhoff]

that the HD platonic solids don't have shape, only geometrically determined positions on an orbit

Again, how nice for you, you can make them anything you what them to be, and you have.

Paul

 

[Paul]

that the HD platonic solids don't have shape, only geometrically determined positions on an orbit

And how is it possible for something without shape to be a solid, and for something multidimensional to have a position fixed using 3 dimensions?

 

[Blue Mountain]

Now, now, Paul, don't go asking Dutch difficult questions.

Besides, the answer is the shape is merely an expression of the consciousness revealed by HDD.

 

[AWPrime]

Besides, the answer is the shape is merely an expression of the consciousness revealed by HDD.

Good trip or bad trip?

 

[dafydd]

And how is it possible for something without shape to be a solid, and for something multidimensional to have a position fixed using 3 dimensions?

Anything is possible in the Dutchiverse.

 

[Dutch]

Again, how nice for you, you can make them anything you what them to be, and you have.

Paul

as far as I know, the geometrical correlations of a tetrahedron, octahedron or cube etc. aren't an issue.

 

[Dutch]

And how is it possible for something without shape to be a solid, and for something multidimensional to have a position fixed using 3 dimensions?

? under which stone have you been hiding? I don't talk about solid shapes, I talk about platonic solid based geometry originating from 3+ dimensions translated in the 2 dimensional system of orbits, this way determining orbtal positions of planets that are based on this platonic solid geometry. There's no shape however and you can't visualize, only the geometrical correlations remain, detectable as geometrically connected orbital positions

 

[Dutch]

a position fixed using 3 dimensions

there's no fixed position in 3D as everything is on the move, only the relative orbital positions are of interest

 

[Dutch]

Now, now, Paul, don't go asking Dutch difficult questions.

Besides, the answer is the shape is merely an expression of the consciousness revealed by HDD.

Paul doesn't ask difficult questions, as long as he understand what he is asking there's no problem

 

[Dutch]

Good trip or bad trip?

Don't be harsh on Blue Mountain like that, he can't help it. Show some respect to the guy please.

 

[Paulhoff]

as far as I know, the geometrical correlations of a tetrahedron, octahedron or cube etc. aren't an issue.

And where did I say those shapes, your stuff has no shape, they are worthless.

Paul

 

[Paulhoff]

there's no fixed position in 3D as everything is on the move, only the relative orbital positions are of interest

Yes, you can move them to any position, again it is worthless.

So stop quoting numbers.

Paul

 

[Dutch]

Anything is possible in the Dutchiverse.

I agree with you

 

[Dutch]

And where did I say those shapes, your stuff has no shape, they are worthless.

Paul

are you drunk?

 

[Paulhoff]

are you drunk?

No Dutch, I'm smart.

Paul

 

[Dutch]

Than I can imagine that in your book I would probably look stupid or worse.

don't worry, I do understand that

 

[Dutch]

Yes, you can move them to any position, again it is worthless.

So stop quoting numbers.

Paul

I guess I was too fast, I replied 'yes you are' on this one, as an answer to the questions 'are you drunk' ?

It wasn't posted initially because I posted to quick, so here goes again

 

[Paul]

? under which stone have you been hiding?

It's just next to yours but it's made of reality.

I don't talk about solid shapes,

Yes you do, and you name them.

I talk about platonic solid based geometry originating from 3+ dimensions

No plus in there, platonic solids have 3 dimensions.

translated in the 2 dimensional system of orbits,

Wrong again. You need 3 dimensions to describe a point in space, and if you are referring to an orbiting body, you require 3 velocities as well.

this way determining orbtal positions of planets that are based on this platonic solid geometry.

What do platonic solids have to do with the solar system?

There's no shape however and you can't visualize, only the geometrical correlations remain, detectable as geometrically connected orbital positions

You can't visualise something that you can describe with geometry and bodies in space can be related to each other. Now we're really getting nowhere.

 

[Paul]

there's no fixed position in 3D as everything is on the move, only the relative orbital positions are of interest

You constantly fix the positions when you claim the importance of specific events or arrangements.