DC
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 23,064
Globovision was the last remaining media outlet critical of Chavez.
evidence?
Globovision was the last remaining media outlet critical of Chavez.
Dangerous to who? I used to create the most chavez criticism threads here. I never thought he was a danger to anyone except himself and his people.
During the oil bubble he was able to spend their money on "defensive" fighter planes and weaponry. However, the oil bubble is over and he's just another crackpot world leader of a country nobody cares about anyway again.
Yes, sir. I am from Venezuela and despite this current social hell, I'm proud of being a Venezuelan.
I mean, this speaks for itself:
...
But it saddens me that we have to go through this
I just hung out with a friend of mine from Venezuela and she was telling me that in the last year she has been robbed thrice and kidnapped twice. On one of the occasions they beat her up.
And she's such a humble, beautiful, hard working human being.
I mean, WHY??
The only one left broadcasting.I think its wrong to arrest him when he indeed only said what is claimed.
not true, even your article quoted another media outlet's critique![]()
It's one thing to nationalize, it's quite another to do it by seizing private property without compensation. And his rhetoric made it clear this was the path he was going down, obvious to anyone but those with blinders on.I think it's because some people started attacking him in the beginning simply for nationalizing their oil company.
Yes, there wasn't a food shortage and hyperinflation for one. How are those price controls working?Was life better for the majority of Venezuelans before Chavez came to power?
even RCTV is still broadcasting.The only one left broadcasting.
Are they allowed to be critical of Dear Leader?even RCTV is still broadcasting.
Yes, there wasn't a food shortage and hyperinflation for one. How are those price controls working?
Oh, and Caracas has the highest murder rate in the world. They stopped keepng track it was so embarrassing to Dear Leader.
Are they allowed to be critical of Dear Leader?
The only one left broadcasting.
Yes, there wasn't a food shortage and hyperinflation for one. How are those price controls working?
Oh, and Caracas has the highest murder rate in the world. They stopped keepng track it was so embarrassing to Dear Leader.
http://www.livetvcenter.com/canal_i_1605.asp
here you can watch Canal_I
a privately owned Venezuelan News Channel that provides both, Pro Chavez and Anti Chavez programm.
sofar for the claim, the only remainng media outlet.
Some of Venezuela's mass media are privately operated and derive most of their revenues from advertising, subscriptions, and sale or distribution of copyrighted materials. A substantial proportion of the Venezuelan television, newspaper, and radio markets is controlled by state-owned outlets. The government has its own news agency, Agencia Bolivariana de Noticias.
The main private television networks are RCTV; Televen; Venevisión; Globovisión. State television includes Venezolana de Televisión, TVes, ViVe (cultural network) and teleSUR (Caracas-based pan-Latin American channel sponsored by seven Latin American states). There are also local community-run television stations such as Televisora Comunitaria del Oeste de Caracas (CatiaTVe). The Venezuelan government also provides funding to Avila TV, Buena TV and Asamblea Nacional TV (ANTV).
Private owners control 472 of Venezuela's FM stations, 243 are local community-based operations and 79 are public, of the country's AM stations 184 are privately owned and 26 are public.
In television, more than 60% of broadcasting concessions (65 stations) are in private hands, while just under 35% (37) are community-based and six are state owned television stations.
Venezuela has an election for its national assembly in September, and the campaign has begun in earnest. I am referring to the international campaign. This is carried out largely through the international media, although some will spill over into the Venezuelan media. It involves many public officials, especially in the US. The goal will be to generate as much bad press as possible about Venezuela, to discredit the government, and to delegitimise the September elections – in case the opposition should choose to boycott, as they did in the last legislative elections, or refuse to recognise the results if they lose.
There's no need for conspiracy, since the principal actors all know what to do. Occasionally some will be off-message due to lack of co-ordination. A fascinating example of this occurred last week when Senator John McCain tried to get General Doug Fraser of the US Southern Command to back his accusations that Venezuela supports terrorist activities. Testifying before the Senate armed services committee on March 11, General Fraser contradicted McCain:
"We have continued to watch very closely … We have not seen any connections specifically that I can verify that there has been a direct government-to-terrorist connection."
Oops! Apparently Fraser didn't get the memo that the Obama team, not just McCain, is in full campaign mode against Venezuela. The next day, he issued a statement recanting his testimony:
"Assistant Secretary Valenzuela [the state department's top Latin America official] and I spoke this morning on the topic of linkages between the government of Venezuela and the Farc. There is zero daylight between our two positions and we are in complete agreement.
"There is indeed clear and documented historical and ongoing evidence of the linkages between the government of Venezuela and the Farc … we are in direct alignment with our partners at the state department and the intelligence community."
Well it's good to know that the United States still has civilian control over the military, at least in the western hemisphere.
You got some real live ones on this forum don't you?
America created the USSR.
War was never a possibility.
The US prevented the soviet union from collapsing.
Maybe the "problem" is that the poor and extremely poor are now actually eating fair portions of food.
I found this article helpful:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/26/restarting-relations-withvenezuela/
I think its wrong to arrest him when he indeed only said what is claimed.
not true, even your article quoted another media outlet's critique![]()
afaik yes, aslong they spread no false information.