How Loony are the Loons?

DavidJames said:
I hope you don't mind, I removed the garish details of you post. ;)

I remember when winning a bowl game used to mean something. Now they are a joke.
Click to expand...

The NCAA has removed the distinction between Division IA and Division IAA in football. Division IAA has a playoff system, while the big schools in Division IA just have bowl games.

Now the winner in the playoff system is the Division I champion. The big boys in football don't even compete. They are in the "Football Bowl Subdivision".

Makes no sense. Kind of like StainRemover's inability to use the quote button.
 
If he does learn how to use the quotes, where are the socks at?

This thread is getting very, very fragmented, and his refusal to use quotes is making it much worse.
 
Just a quick question to ask if Mr. R Bush has yet demonstrated any ability to learn simple facts or manipulate tools yet?

I mean...is he still thinking that a B757 hit the WTC? Does he still labor under the delusion that a wide body (double aisle) B767 is smaller than a (single aisle) B707??

Has he ever yet used the "quote" function??

-z

(Sorry, can't be bothered to read the thread as his very first post made my brain esplode.)
 
Last edited:
RemoveBush said:
"You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Go and read this thread:"

Apparently, neither do you!!!

"But we are to believe that it took a weekend to rig a huge building and a bunch of angry white guys with mid-80s IQ can spot it over demolition contracts, even though something this tall has never been done in demolition history?"

NO ONE is claiming it "took a weekend" for any of this! Talking about IQ's your are in mils, not inches.
Click to expand...

If you continue to use my words without using either the quote or multiquote function I will report you to the moderators. You are making it appear that you have written my words, and as per the conditions of both the Registration Agreement and Membership Agreement of this forum, what I write here is covered by copyright. If you continue to violate my copyright rights I will report you to the moderators. I will not stand for the plaigarism of my writing.
RemoveBush said:
"And don't try pulling that 'radio-controlled' BS outta your arse. There's a reason demo companies use hardwiring instead of radio control. It's called interference. They don't want to take the chance that a stray radio signal, either from a cell-phone, two-way radio, or electrometer would accidentally set off the charges before they're supposed to go off."

Yes I know, I am VERY versed in RF! My point was that IT COULD be done! Your making an ABSOLUTE statement that it CAN'T!!!

Just like the government would NEVER attack it's own. Yet there are plenty of examples, the U.S.S. Liberty is one that can't be disputed.
Click to expand...

If you continue to use my words without using either the quote or multiquote function I will report you to the moderators. You are making it appear that you have written my words, and as per the conditions of both the Registration Agreement and Membership Agreement of this forum, what I write here is covered by copyright. If you continue to violate my copyright rights I will report you to the moderators. I will not stand for the plaigarism of my writing.

Registration Agreement:

Copyright

Any post or article published on the JREF forum by a Member is the copyright of the Member and may not be reproduced, copied or otherwise re-published without the express permission of the Member. By posting on the Forum a Member grants
the JREF a non-exclusive licence to publish, republish or reproduce their work,
in its entirety or as the JREF sees fit, in perpetuity. The James Randi
Educational Foundation is the copyright holder of the JREF Forum.
Click to expand...

Membership Agreement:
Rules

4. You will not post "copyright-protected1" material in its entirety,

______________________________________________
Notes:
1The JREF has adopted a policy of considering all published material copyrighted, including articles, images and other media, it is not the responsibility of the JREF to determine whether or not the work is in the public domain or if the work may be republished without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Copyrighted content may be posted within the doctrine of "fair use" therefore quoting of brief portions of articles, books, emails, or bulletin board messages, relevant to discussion, is permitted. All quoted material should be credited to the original author or publisher and a link provided (when available) to the original work.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
HeyLeroy said:
If you continue to use my words without using either the quote or multiquote function I will report you to the moderators. You are making it appear that you have written my words, and as per the conditions of both the registration agreement and membership agreement of this forum, what I write here is covered by copyright. If you continue to violate my copyright rights I will report you to the moderators. I will not stand for the plaigarism of my writing.


If you continue to use my words without using either the quote or multiquote function I will report you to the moderators. You are making it appear that you have written my words, and as per the conditions of both the registration agreement and membership agreement of this forum, what I write here is covered by copyright. If you continue to violate my copyright rights I will report you to the moderators. I will not stand for the plaigarism of my writing.

Registration Agreement:



Membership Agreement:
Click to expand...


Oh, good catch. Would you mind if everyone else copied this, with our names in place of yours?

I wouldn't want to copy you without permission after all that!
 
Horatius said:
Oh, good catch. Would you mind if everyone else copied this, with our names in place of yours?

I wouldn't want to copy you without permission after all that!
Click to expand...

Permission granted.
 
Last edited:
RemoveBush said:
"But you have a logical problem, no matter what the technical facts. You're saying the the planners set up a scenario which is impossible. They would never do that, because people would ask questions, and they would be caught."

Kind of short sighted arent you??? So then we don't have any bank robbers??? We have no crime what so ever because someone can "figure it out"????

Your the one not very logical! All they need to do is spoon feed a few people who can't think for themselves and the rest will happen natually.
Click to expand...

Spoon feeding TIME. i wnt mine erly. cn ou cet there
 
As originally posted by HeyLeroy. I have altered the format, but the content is the same.

If you continue to use my words without using either the quote or multiquote function I will report you to the moderators. You are making it appear that you have written my words, and as per the conditions of both the Registration Agreement and Membership Agreement of this forum, what I write here is covered by copyright. If you continue to violate my copyright rights I will report you to the moderators. I will not stand for the plaigarism of my writing.

Registration Agreement:

Copyright

Any post or article published on the JREF forum by a Member is the copyright of
the Member and may not be reproduced, copied or otherwise re-published without
the express permission of the Member. By posting on the Forum a Member grants
the JREF a non-exclusive licence to publish, republish or reproduce their work,
in its entirety or as the JREF sees fit, in perpetuity. The James Randi
Educational Foundation is the copyright holder of the JREF Forum.
Click to expand...



Membership Agreement:
Rules

4. You will not post "copyright-protected1" material in its entirety,

______________________________________________
Notes:
1The JREF has adopted a policy of considering all published material copyrighted, including articles, images and other media, it is not the responsibility of the JREF to determine whether or not the work is in the public domain or if the work may be republished without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Copyrighted content may be posted within the doctrine of "fair use" therefore quoting of brief portions of articles, books, emails, or bulletin board messages, relevant to discussion, is permitted. All quoted material should be credited to the original author or publisher and a link provided (when available) to the original work.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Really, RemoveBush, your behavior is annoying and unacceptable. You have repeatedly posted the words of other posters without indicating who originally said them. Not only is this a violation of your membership agreement, as HeyLeroy pointed out, but it makes following this thread extremely tedious to read through.
 
Last edited:
babazaroni said:
Wow, you actually did a cut and paste, then added the url to show who the author was.

Did you know that the quote function will do all this and give a link to the original quote and format for readability, with less effort?

There is a reason you see the [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/helloworld/buttons/quote.gif[/qimg] at the bottom of every post.
Click to expand...

I suspect that he did not cut and paste, but did use the quote function to get the text with link. Then he removed the tags to give the appearance of cutting and pasting.

He only does it to annoy/because he knows it teases.

(wish I could remember all of that quote)

Dave

ETA
Found it

Speak roughly to your little boy,
And beat him when he sneezes:
He only does it to annoy,
Because he knows it teases
 
Last edited:
HeyLeroy said:
Thank you, JonnyFive!
Click to expand...

Thank you for pointing out the membership agreement issues.

I think we've been extremely tolerant of his BS, but it needs to stop now. I keep having to scan through his masses to text until I see something that I recognize as my words to respond to.

Imagine how difficult this would make things for someone who jumps in on, say, page 18 of this thread without knowing who said what. Half the time I can't follow who said the "quotes" he posts, and I've been reading this thread from the beginning.

It may not matter to RemoveBush that we have a discussion that can be followed by third parties, but it certainly seems to matter to everyone else here.

ETA: Damn, I wasted my 666th post. You see what you did, RemoveBush, you see what you did?!
 
Last edited:
JonnyFive said:
As originally posted by HeyLeroy. I have altered the format, but the content is the same.
Click to expand...

In the same spirit:


RemoveBush said:
" I did post a comment on your silly assertion that voltage and current were forms of radiation, but that didn't involve any insults to you, just to your ideas and alleged qualifications.

So, were you lying when you said "Because they want to insult, I will return in kind", or are you just a liar?"

So let's just visit the attacks!!!!

"It's like he thinks we'll have to agree with him now that he's started "speaking our language". Too bad he only learned to speak it phonetically, and has no idea what the grunting noises actually mean."

"Should I start talking whackjob?"

"It's so we know WHAT THE HELL YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. Fruitloop."

Now some of these MAY be in response to me attacking, but if YOU or anyone else debates rather than attacking so do I.

I ONLY attack after being attacked.

Is that proof enough for you? These are your OWN words.
Click to expand...

If you continue to use my words without using either the quote or multiquote function I will report you to the moderators. You are making it appear that you have written my words, and as per the conditions of both the Registration Agreement and Membership Agreement of this forum, what I write here is covered by copyright. If you continue to violate my copyright rights I will report you to the moderators. I will not stand for the plaigarism of my writing.

This case of unsourced quoting is particularly loathsome, as he has intermingled several posts, and edited those posts, to make it look as if I were attacking him in an unprovoked manner. If he had the intellectual integrity to source his quotes, this would have been obvious to all.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2208051#post2208051

This was posted after his comment that said voltage and current were forms of radiation, and was discussing his possible sockiness. I stand by the assertion that anyone who thinks voltage is radiation doesn't know what those words mean.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2208607#post2208607

This particular comment (about speaking whackjob) was made during my complaint about being called MORON, which was an unprovoked attack.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2208706#post2208706

This was a strongly worded complaint about his inability to quote properly. I did use the word fruitloop, but this was in post 409, well after being called MORON in post 378. Also note that he was calling others MORONS right from his very first post.

Totally dishonest misrepresentation of our posting history, intended to cast me as the bad guy, when in fact it's the exact opposite. IMHO, of course.

Registration Agreement:

Copyright

Any post or article published on the JREF forum by a Member is the copyright of the Member and may not be reproduced, copied or otherwise re-published without the express permission of the Member. By posting on the Forum a Member grants the JREF a non-exclusive licence to publish, republish or reproduce their work, in its entirety or as the JREF sees fit, in perpetuity. The James Randi Educational Foundation is the copyright holder of the JREF Forum.
Click to expand...

Membership Agreement:

Rules:

4. You will not post "copyright-protected1" material in its entirety,

______________________________________________
Notes:
1The JREF has adopted a policy of considering all published material copyrighted, including articles, images and other media, it is not the responsibility of the JREF to determine whether or not the work is in the public domain or if the work may be republished without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Copyrighted content may be posted within the doctrine of "fair use" therefore quoting of brief portions of articles, books, emails, or bulletin board messages, relevant to discussion, is permitted. All quoted material should be credited to the original author or publisher and a link provided (when available) to the original work.
Click to expand...
 
RemoveBush said:
"except the planes on 9/11 were larger and faster, what does physics say about that?"

NO! Actually a 767 is slightly smaller and about a 100 miles per hour slower than the 707. Perhaps you need to do some research on this??????

The 707 is actually a bigger faster plane. It is however, much less economical than the 767.
Click to expand...

Physics!

we don't need no stinkiing physics.
sounds of gunshots.
 
RemoveBush said:
"Can I ask what level of mathmetics instruction you've completed? Level of physics instruction?"

I have a bachelors in Engineering and have worked in my field for over 10 years, using my math EVERYDAY.
Click to expand...

In your dreams
 
"And where in any of your nonsense have you actually told us that you wrote that tripe?"

Your really as NUMB as a punded THUMB aren't you?

If you would READ!

This is the VERY FIRST POST!

My god, I have seen people like Forrest Gump smarter than you!

"
How Loony are the Loons?
A long post on 911blogger.com by a deranged, semi-literate loon. It's fascinating that he gets NOTHING right. These are the people who want to change the world, who brand as "sheeple" others whose reasoning abilities are vastly superior. How can such an incredibly stupid person pontificate about subjects he can't begin to comprehend??

Submitted by RemoveBush on Mon, 12/25/2006 - 12:20am.

The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories
This is a reply that I wrote to them....
I encourage everyone to do something similar.
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=A..."

Stop using insults and stick to the Membership Agreement. In addition, please use the quote function to attribute quotes to their proper authors.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom