How Loony are the Loons?

PerryLogan said:
What conspirator would be dumb enough to break the laws of physics? Wouldn't that totally give away the plan?
​
Click to expand...
That's what I always thought, until I found out who in the NWO was the Minister in Charge of Leaving Terribly Obvious Clues ! Now I wonder ... :)

Of course, no "laws of physics" were broken on 9/11. What is broken is the CTers understanding of these laws. But this has been covered more than enough on this forum.
 
"PerryLogan - What conspirator would be dumb enough to break the laws of physics? Wouldn't that totally give away the plan?"

You CAN'T break the laws of physics...... You can assist them in performing their task, but you can't break them.

You can't simple decide that you are going to make a building fall in 1 second when it would take 3 seconds to fall in a vacuum.

Perhaps I mis-understood your statement?

As far as your second part of the question. No! If you are a criminal, you want people to doubt that you would be capable of doing something like this. You want people to argue amongst themselves, because if they are arguing with each other you are free to continue stealing.

That is what Iraq is about! Stealing, not Liberation or any other cause. In chaos they can steal, and boy have they stole.
 
Firestone said:
Of course, no "laws of physics" were broken on 9/11. What is broken is the CTers understanding of these laws. But this has been covered more than enough on this forum.
Click to expand...

How can you break that which was never intact?
 
Again PerryLogan, Physics was not broken! It was assisted! The laws CANNOT be broken.

Do you have some piont, or are you going to just keep stating the same nonsense? I have already answered you, yet you simply re-type the same rhetoric.
 
That was Horatius quoting me. Horatius is obviously a man of taste and breeding.

I meant that a hoax depends on verisimilitude. The perps want their cover story to go down smoothly, with no questions asked. If the cover story contains an impossibility--i.e., a violation in the laws of physics--it's a bad cover story that no one would use. Such a plan would never get off the drawing board.

As for the administration's ability to bring off 9/11, it would be the one and only thing they've done right. What are the chances?

Frankly, I don't think any administration or goverment on the face of the earth could have brought 9/11 off as a subterfuge. Looks like militant Muslims to me.
 
Last edited:
RemoveBush said:
Again PerryLogan, Physics was not broken! It was assisted! The laws CANNOT be broken.

Do you have some piont, or are you going to just keep stating the same nonsense? I have already answered you, yet you simply re-type the same rhetoric.
Click to expand...
do you even knwo who your replying to?

anyway, this is mainly in response to the CTer claims that the towers fell faster than freefall
 
"defaultdotxbe - anyway, this is mainly in response to the CTer claims that the towers fell faster than freefall"

Here is another reason why the "CTers" are accused of many things that are not TRUE!

I am a "truther" and I have YET to see anyone claim that the towers fell faster than "free fall". We do claim that they fell at "NEAR Free Fall", which is IMPOSSIBLE without some outside assistence. The buildings did not have enough Kenetic Energy to destroy themselves in mid air.
 
RemoveBush said:
"defaultdotxbe - anyway, this is mainly in response to the CTer claims that the towers fell faster than freefall"

Here is another reason why the "CTers" are accused of many things that are not TRUE!

I am a "truther" and I have YET to see anyone claim that the towers fell faster than "free fall". We do claim that they fell at "NEAR Free Fall", which is IMPOSSIBLE without some outside assistence. The buildings did not have enough Kenetic Energy to destroy themselves in mid air.
Click to expand...
really? i hear it a lot

BTW how near is "near?" did you know that 1 second slower than freefall would result in an energy equal to over 40 tons of TNT per tower? was that enough to destroy the towers? if not, how did the conspirators get over 40 tons of TNT into the towers without anyone noticing?
 
RemoveBush said:
This person can clearly not read!!! The reply was not to "ordinary folks" it was to the US GOVERNMENT! I guess this is what's wrong with our country these days, as someone above posted, our schools are not teaching the basics. He/She cannot clearly read!
Click to expand...

We can read quite well, thank you.

"Ordinary folks" who disagree with your nonsensical gibberish are routinely accused, tried, convicted and sentenced of being with the government and subsequently informed that their sentences will be carrried out at the earliest possible opportunity.

I myself have been convicted of being CIA/CENTCOM over at 911blogger despite the fact that I am a canadian citizen living in canada. When I pointed this out, no one cared. You idiots are appearantly going to come for me anyway.
 
I am a "truther" and I have YET to see anyone claim that the towers fell faster than "free fall". We do claim that they fell at "NEAR Free Fall", which is IMPOSSIBLE without some outside assistence.
Click to expand...
The JREF ninjas can set you straight on that.

But you have a logical problem, no matter what the technical facts. You're saying the the planners set up a scenario which is impossible. They would never do that, because people would ask questions, and they would be caught.
 
Last edited:
RemoveBush said:
"defaultdotxbe - anyway, this is mainly in response to the CTer claims that the towers fell faster than freefall"

Here is another reason why the "CTers" are accused of many things that are not TRUE!

I am a "truther" and I have YET to see anyone claim that the towers fell faster than "free fall". We do claim that they fell at "NEAR Free Fall", which is IMPOSSIBLE without some outside assistence. The buildings did not have enough Kenetic Energy to destroy themselves in mid air.
Click to expand...

Really ? are you even qualified to make this statement?

please show your maths that back up your claim.
 
Re the 40 tons of TNT.

Duh, they snuck it in there at night.

They are crafty!

LOL

So many kooks, so little logic.
 
PerryLogan, yes it was the government! Perhaps you missed the memo from the mid 1960's called Operation Northwoods???? It outlines a very similar case for attacking Americans to gain support for a war with Cuba.

Perhaps you missed that the OKC bombing was something other than a little terrorist called Timmothy McVei??? The bomb squad pulled 3-5 bombs out of the building later in the day that FAILED to explode. You gonna tell me that Tim was able to get into the building and plant those bombs and knew where to plant them?

Now to 911. Bush was warned by 11 + countries. He had the FBI jumping up and down about something about to happen. Minutes after being told of the attack it is pinned on OBL.

This is the very type of tactic that is used by a government to point the evidence toward someone else.

Another FACT! In MANY instances during a "terrorist" attack, the government is usually performing exercises for the very thing that happens. Examples:

OKC: the bomb squad was just down the street and had to turn it into a live exercise.

911: Multiple exercises, including a "live fly" that included targets that were attacked.

7/7 London bombing: They were practicing for the very thing, the exact same train and bus route when the terrorists attacked.

The evidence is there! I have looked at the information, I have anylized photos and I have heard witnesses state that they heard and saw explossions taking place before the collapse.

It's not a paranoid thing, its a FACT based thing. I take the data, analyze it, and draw conclusions based upon the FACTS.
 
"I myself have been convicted of being CIA/CENTCOM over at 911blogger despite the fact that I am a canadian citizen living in canada. When I pointed this out, no one cared. You idiots are appearantly going to come for me anyway."

And you wonder why people attack you??????

Perhaps if you did not attack them they would not do the same?

I know that I generally don't attack someone UNTIL they attack me first, much like what you have done by calling me an "idiot"!
 
RemoveBush said:
PerryLogan, yes it was the government! Perhaps you missed the memo from the mid 1960's called Operation Northwoods???? It outlines a very similar case for attacking Americans to gain support for a war with Cuba.

Perhaps you missed that the OKC bombing was something other than a little terrorist called Timmothy McVei??? The bomb squad pulled 3-5 bombs out of the building later in the day that FAILED to explode. You gonna tell me that Tim was able to get into the building and plant those bombs and knew where to plant them?

Now to 911. Bush was warned by 11 + countries. He had the FBI jumping up and down about something about to happen. Minutes after being told of the attack it is pinned on OBL.

This is the very type of tactic that is used by a government to point the evidence toward someone else.

Another FACT! In MANY instances during a "terrorist" attack, the government is usually performing exercises for the very thing that happens. Examples:

OKC: the bomb squad was just down the street and had to turn it into a live exercise.

911: Multiple exercises, including a "live fly" that included targets that were attacked.

7/7 London bombing: They were practicing for the very thing, the exact same train and bus route when the terrorists attacked.

The evidence is there! I have looked at the information, I have anylized photos and I have heard witnesses state that they heard and saw explossions taking place before the collapse.

It's not a paranoid thing, its a FACT based thing. I take the data, analyze it, and draw conclusions based upon the FACTS.
Click to expand...
wow, thats everything weve discussed and debunked here in the past week or so, lol
 
Dr. Lao said:
Re the 40 tons of TNT.

Duh, they snuck it in there at night.

They are crafty!

LOL

So many kooks, so little logic.
Click to expand...

And don't forget the thousands upon thousands of interior renovations tradesmen who were brought in to repair and replace all the drywall, cieling tiles, floor coverings and fixtures that were damaged and/or removed while the sapper teams were planting the tens of thousands of charges need to bring down the towers.

All done without the tens of thousands who work in the WTC ever noticing a thing.
 
"defaultdotxbe - BTW how near is "near?" did you know that 1 second slower than freefall would result in an energy equal to over 40 tons of TNT per tower? was that enough to destroy the towers? if not, how did the conspirators get over 40 tons of TNT into the towers without anyone noticing?"

Now you are really showing your ignorance! Did you know that you CANNOT get an object to FALL faster than it can in a vacuum??? Unless you shoot it with some high power force. Explossions are high power, but they do not DRIVE the building into the ground they destroy the support so the building still falls at a free fall speed.

Please do some research on what you are trying to talk about, you just make yourself look stupid.
 
RemoveBush said:
"defaultdotxbe - BTW how near is "near?" did you know that 1 second slower than freefall would result in an energy equal to over 40 tons of TNT per tower? was that enough to destroy the towers? if not, how did the conspirators get over 40 tons of TNT into the towers without anyone noticing?"

Now you are really showing your ignorance! Did you know that you CANNOT get an object to FALL faster than it can in a vacuum??? Unless you shoot it with some high power force. Explossions are high power, but they do not DRIVE the building into the ground they destroy the support so the building still falls at a free fall speed.

Please do some research on what you are trying to talk about, you just make yourself look stupid.
Click to expand...
and you just made yourself look liek you cant read

pay very close attention to the bolded words
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom