• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: House Impeachment Inquiry - part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
This Canadian would like to see more anti-Trump Americans admitted to Canada. Anyone who wants to come for that reason is probably smart enough to be an asset to Canada.

On the other hand if we remove the anti-Trump Americans from the US, what's left? The US still has the nukes.
 
That's very questionable at best, but you make it absolutely absurd when you claim it's "naive" to think otherwise. Where are these people? Point one of them out to me, please.

The same people who would approve of someone like Trump approve of this specific instance of Trumpish behavior.


Again I'm not going to argue against any version of "Oh the Dems? They don't need checks and balances because everything they are doing is for the greater good because it will stop Trump" kind of argument.
 
Again I'm not going to argue against any version of "Oh the Dems? They don't need checks and balances because everything they are doing is for the greater good because it will stop Trump" kind of argument.

I'm not asking you to argue against that, I'm asking you to support your claim that so many Dems are currently harboring wishes for their own Trump.

Go ahead: Find some of these people for me. Provide examples.
 
On the other hand if we remove the anti-Trump Americans from the US, what's left? The US still has the nukes.

Point taken. Although leaving for Canada should be voluntary, not compulsory. Perhaps there will be enough anti-Trump Americans who are willing to stay and work towards post-Trump that the nuclear threat can be alleviated.
 
Republicans for the Rule Of Law are going to be airing a new 32 second ad. Last week, they launched a campaign aimed at educating GOP voters who have continued to support Trump despite the facts in the Ukraine scandal clearly showing his criminal behaviour



The ad is going to air on Faux News’ morning show “Fox & Friends” for several days.

Firstly, I'm really surprised that Rupert Murdoch would even allow this.

Secondly, if he doesn't give it the axe, does that indicate the beginnings of a change in Faux News policy towards blindly supporting Trump?
 
You must have an IV with a constant GOP Kool Aid drip.
Politicians have always foisted partisan, fact-deprived bs -- during Watergate and now. (Although in the age of Trump, it's so brazen it's a surreal joke.) A big difference back then, there wasn't a Fox News Channel legitimizing "alternate facts". The Trump cultists exist within a bubble that's hard for us fact-based people to comprehend. Just watch Fox and nothing else for a week.
 
Politicians have always foisted partisan, fact-deprived bs -- during Watergate and now. (Although in the age of Trump, it's so brazen it's a surreal joke.) A big difference back then, there wasn't a Fox News Channel legitimizing "alternate facts". The Trump cultists exist within a bubble that's hard for us fact-based people to comprehend. Just watch Fox and nothing else for a week.

You misspelled "foistered".
 
Exactly! I cannot say how strongly they disgust me with their blatant hypocrisy and party before country actions.

We should all just start capitalizing “The Party” now in regards to Republicans.

It’s only a matter of time before the official Censors declare it to be law.
 
Politicians have always foisted partisan, fact-deprived bs -- during Watergate and now. (Although in the age of Trump, it's so brazen it's a surreal joke.) A big difference back then, there wasn't a Fox News Channel legitimizing "alternate facts". The Trump cultists exist within a bubble that's hard for us fact-based people to comprehend. Just watch Fox and nothing else for a week.

What have I ever done to you to make you say such an awful thing?
 
Politicians have always foisted partisan, fact-deprived bs -- during Watergate and now. (Although in the age of Trump, it's so brazen it's a surreal joke.) A big difference back then, there wasn't a Fox News Channel legitimizing "alternate facts". The Trump cultists exist within a bubble that's hard for us fact-based people to comprehend. Just watch Fox and nothing else for a week.


Five minutes of "Fox & Friends" was all I could stomach.

Also, is Laura Ingraham the most bigoted racist bitch on television? Is she really the horrible person she appears to be, or is that just a fake front for TV?
 
Five minutes of "Fox & Friends" was all I could stomach.

Also, is Laura Ingraham the most bigoted racist bitch on television? Is she really the horrible person she appears to be, or is that just a fake front for TV?

It can be argued that title should belong to Jeanine Pirro.
 
Politicians have always foisted partisan, fact-deprived bs -- during Watergate and now. (Although in the age of Trump, it's so brazen it's a surreal joke.) A big difference back then, there wasn't a Fox News Channel legitimizing "alternate facts". The Trump cultists exist within a bubble that's hard for us fact-based people to comprehend. Just watch Fox and nothing else for a week.

Well, maybe add in viewing 20 or so hours of facebook right wing memes for the full effect.
 
Please help me understand: which moral principle is being violated by the House investigating the President?
He's projecting, IMO.

Now I'll check to see if your question is answered, because I'd like to know as well. Maybe he has a detailed and concrete response.

ETA: Nope, not yet. Which is diappointing. Beyond the role-playing there might be an interesting conversation.
 
Last edited:
Five minutes of "Fox & Friends" was all I could stomach.

Also, is Laura Ingraham the most bigoted racist bitch on television? Is she really the horrible person she appears to be, or is that just a fake front for TV?

Her gay brother has said she's actually kind-hearted and wonderful. Just kidding. He says she's a "monster."
 
This Canadian would like to see more anti-Trump Americans admitted to Canada. Anyone who wants to come for that reason is probably smart enough to be an asset to Canada.


This Canadian would like to see them stay in the US and help fix this ****.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom