Improbable Joe
Thinker
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2009
- Messages
- 147
Why do you blame Obama for Bush-era issues?
No. That may be the view of many here who seem quite defensive. I view the Obamavilles as an interesting cultural phenomena.
Shades of William Gibson's character "The Suit" - the Sprawl - The dystopic street society of Bladerunner. Where are we headed?
Back to an earlier failed assertion/snipe/insult:
Anyone read Grapes of Wrath?
It is very interesting you would still continue to use the term "Obamaville" as if is a commonly accepted term despite it being considered by many here to be polemic biased nonsense.
paximperium said:Yeah, you are a neutral person "just asking questions".![]()
Meanwhile....Redistribute the poverty!
Who is this "we" you are talking about?Oh, all right. But we get to put another one on Geithner's roof.
Why do you blame Obama for Bush-era issues?
Not one mention of "BarackBurgs". You are now left with lying and making things up. I can imagine you enjoying and gleefully waiting for more tent cities to pop up to justify your little ideological nonsense. Sad.The growing encampments led the city to place portable toilets and security guards near one area known as New Jack City, named after a dark and drug-filled 1991 movie. But that just attracted more homeless people.
Americans have grown more optimistic about the economy and the direction of the country in the 11 weeks since President Obama was inaugurated, suggesting that he is enjoying some success in his critical task of rebuilding the nation’s confidence ...
Irrelevant. There has never been a subject that was less aligned with polls than the current economic situation. Now actual consumer purchasing data is of course an indicator.Hey mhaze, here's a little something for ya, buddy..Outlook on Economy Is Brightening, Poll Finds
I checked and this seems to be corroborated by Gallup. I suppose that's just because of Obama's government-powered mind-control machines, right?![]()
Not one mention of "BarackBurgs". You are now left with lying and making things up. I can imagine you enjoying and gleefully waiting for more tent cities to pop up to justify your little ideological nonsense. Sad.
Irrelevant. There has never been a subject that was less aligned with polls than the current economic situation. Now actual consumer purchasing data is of course an indicator.
If any data no matter how relevant does not support mhaze's ideology, therefore it is "irrelevant".Irrelevant. There has never been a subject that was less aligned with polls than the current economic situation. Now actual consumer purchasing data is of course an indicator.
Not one mention of "BarackBurgs". You are now left with lying and making things up. I can imagine you enjoying and gleefully waiting for more tent cities to pop up to justify your little ideological nonsense. Sad.
Thanks for the irrelevant spam that show you are unable to own up to the fact that not one of these tent cities is called Obama/Baracks-burg/ville or whatever nonsense you're trying to spew. You attempted that Obamaville nonsense and are now retreating from your OP. Nothing more than a sign of dishonesty and cowardice.Sad...that you don't look and see what's right in front of you. From the web, a few hints of the emerging use of the phrase "Barackville". Does this rub you the wrong way? Gee..... Try a tent city.
now I'm starting to think some of those just might be named "Barackvilles"
The only good part of this economic calamity is that I can hope to one day watch the former employees of the NYT, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC and Newsweek living in Barackvilles and lining up for soup kitchens.
The plan that will be announced on Monday is awful, another giveaway to investors. Be prepared to live in tent cities that well can be named "Barackvilles".
40. Ronald Reagan 1981 - 198930 some years back.
You left off the 's'.