Homosexuality is a choice

As a straight male, I'm finding the idea that I could choose to be gay beyond silly. Still waiting to find out how old Bishardi was when he made the decision to become straight.

I was attracted to women in way that I was not to men when I was four years old (maybe earlier, buy I don't remember), and I had what amounted to sexual fantasies about women at that age. So if I "decided" to be straight, I must have done so before I even understood the concept or the consequences of that choice.
 
Possibly because he was suspended.

I can honestly say I smiled when I saw that.

Sigh, he wasn't the worst chew toy I've enjoyed here, but it is annoying how he dodges questions and ignores arguments that he's mistaken (evidence of his cognitive dissonance).

When you come back, Bishadi, it would be terrific of you to answer my question. It's an interesting one and you may enjoy contemplating it more than you enjoy ignoring it:

How does one choose what they find sexually arousing?
 
did you come from the copulation between a man and women?

when you asnwer that, you have evidence!

... of something else than you claimed. Sorry, you claimed that you can know someone's sexual preferences by looking between their legs. Support that.

Now turning it into being about procreation is at best an appeal to consequences fallacy, but still doesn't address the original claim.

when i claim a human mind is not based on electricity and wires; to put your head into an MRI and still live, you have evidence!

Well, I'm glad you can at least demolish your own oversimplified strawmen. Let me assure you that everyone else understood just fine what "wiring" means there. Plus, since the study was already linked to, if you had bothered to read it, you'd know what it means.

But nah, it's more fun to demolish your own strawmen, right?

When i show homosexuals that what they have been led to believe is a lie, then to look at the post of people making their choice over being honest, you can witness evidence of denial.

So, when are you going to actually show that? So far I've only seen BS postulates, fallacies, and misunderstandings.

Before talking about what will happen when you actually show that, let's first see you actually show that. So far it ain't happened.

When reality slaps people in the face, many are not happy; YOU are evidence!

And more BS postulates, with an ad hominem to boot. Are you going to actually support your claims any time soon, or is that the best you can do.
 
I think it was a reference to The Puppy Episode.
(You may have known that, eh?)

Uhm...err... no I didn't....sorry.... :blush:

ETA:
I have to watch that episode now. Especially because of this part:
WikiLink Above said:
She runs into Susan in the hall and returns with her to her room. They continue to enjoy each other's company until Susan tells Ellen that she's gay and that she thought Ellen might be too. Ellen denies it and suggests that Susan is trying to "recruit" her. Susan sarcastically says that she'll have to call "national headquarters" and let them know Ellen got away. "Damn, just one more and I would have gotten that toaster oven."

So it is true!!!! The agenda IS toasty buns!!!!! :D
 
Last edited:
I think Bishadi is under the impression that a person is only homosexual if, and only if, they've done homosexual activity.
 
in the early 80's i did write a paper rendering the brain is not operating on electrical exchanges at the synaptic junctions.

ie... i was into the physics, biology and molecular make up of the brain before i was 16 yrs old.

wrong subject

not to mention that pursuing causal understanding of life is what i do for a living
What is this supposed to mean?
 
I've always found interesting that experiment someone did with rats once, where they created a confined environment and let them breed as much as they wanted, and observed the behavior. The more rats that occupied the space, the more same-sex relations that were observed. It was suggested that perhaps homosexuality shows up when the population reaches a certain density, as a sort of growth-control method. The more gays, the smaller the next generation, the less shared the resources will have to be.
Do you have a citation for that study?
 
if you read up on evolution, you would find that there are lots of mutations in within biological life

If?

In any case, your assertion that evolution cannot support homosexuality because homosexuals do not reproduce is false, for the same reason that it is obviously false that evolution cannot support any genetic conditions -- which can be described in terms of their regular occurrence per capita -- that preclude reproduction.
 
I call you post bigotry!

A widow from Montgomery went on vacation in Savannah. When she got back, her bridge group asked her how it was. "I hear", said one of them, "that all sorts of things go on in Savannah."

"Well," said the widow, "it turns out they have men down there who go to bed with other men. They call them 'gays'."

"Oh, really?!" said the bridge players.

"Yes," she said, "and they have women down there who go to bed with other women. They call them 'lesbians'."

"Oh, really?!" gasped the bridge players.

"Yes," said the widow, "and they have boys down there who put their mouths on women's private parts."

"Oh, really?!" said the bridge players.

"And what do they call them?", one of them asked.

"Well," said the widow, "when I could catch my breath, I called him darling!"
 
"Well," said the widow, "when I could catch my breath, I called him darling!"
This forum needs a whole new thread devoted exclusively to possible alternative endings to that story. :) :) I have several in mind but the mods frown on derails. :(
 

Back
Top Bottom