• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

makaya325 said:
A Racoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable. Sasquatch and a bear are different, one stands on its hind legs, the other has broad shoulders, saggital crest, bipedal, and resembles an upright gorilla
Click to expand...
What reliable evidence do you have that a bigfoot has those characteristics, and that they were accurately observed, rather than extrapolated after the fact by the assumption of what was seen? You, after all, thought you saw a raccoon, and had you been asked later what its characteristics were, I would be willing to bet that you would have added things you know, or assume, are characteristics of a raccoon, whether or not you had observed them in the picture. This is not a criticism, but an observation of how people fill in details of observation when they assume they know what they saw.

I'm interested, too, that you believe bigfoot resembles a gorilla, because gorilla-like proportions would pretty thoroughly disqualify the creature shown in the Patterson-Gimlin film as a bigfoot, wouldn't it?
 
bruto said:
What reliable evidence do you have that a bigfoot has those characteristics, and that they were accurately observed, rather than extrapolated after the fact by the assumption of what was seen? You, after all, thought you saw a raccoon, and had you been asked later what its characteristics were, I would be willing to bet that you would have added things you know, or assume, are characteristics of a raccoon, whether or not you had observed them in the picture. This is not a criticism, but an observation of how people fill in details of observation when they assume they know what they saw.

I'm interested, too, that you believe bigfoot resembles a gorilla, because gorilla-like proportions would pretty thoroughly disqualify the creature shown in the Patterson-Gimlin film as a bigfoot, wouldn't it?
Click to expand...


The pgf subject has arms longer than bob h's arm-leg ratio. Bob has little chicken arms, while patty has neanderthal arms
 
makaya325 said:
Lets not CLAIM its imaginary just yet. If that is imaginary, then 1000's of people are victims of a mafia of hoaxers for 100's of years aka omnipotent hoaxer
Click to expand...

Got a decent pic yet? As you said, it's only been 100s of years now. It's typically not impossible to get good pics of real creatures. The imaginary ones are a bit more challenging though.


1972_dancing_monster.gif
 
xblade said:
Got a decent pic yet? As you said, it's only been 100s of years now. It's typically not impossible to get good pics of real creatures. The imaginary ones are a bit more challenging though.


[qimg]http://www.clipartof.com/images/emoticons/xsmall2/1972_dancing_monster.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...


Cameras havent been around for 100's of years, genius. Its not impossible, but its nothing to underestimate. One walk in the woods doesnt guarantee you a wolverine
 
makaya325 said:
The pgf subject has arms longer than bob h's arm-leg ratio. Bob has little chicken arms, while patty has neanderthal arms
Click to expand...
Well, aside from the obvious possibility that if one is wearing a suit, the thickness of arms is subject to simulation, the things you describe do not go very far toward making "Patty" look much like a gorilla. Even if Patty is real, it's a poor way to describe a bigfoot.
 
bruto said:
Well, aside from the obvious possibility that if one is wearing a suit, the thickness of arms is subject to simulation, the things you describe do not go very far toward making "Patty" look much like a gorilla. Even if Patty is real, it's a poor way to describe a bigfoot.
Click to expand...

Why not? The incredible mass, fluid movement, sagittal crest, bipedal ape, Broad shouldered
 
makaya325 said:
Give me PROOF i use someone elses arguements here, until then, your wrong
Click to expand...

That was reliable evidence that you ape skeptics. Let's review.

1) Skeptic ask for source from makaya, specifies no biased Bigfoot sites.

2) Makaya provides Bigfoot site, says it's much better than BFRO.

3) Skeptic explains bias.

4) Makaya openly insults BFRO on at least 3 different forums.

5) Makaya says there are no DNA samples for aliens and asks for link.

6) Skeptic explains there are no confirmed Bigfoot DNA samples and provides links to sites featuring alleged alien biological samples.

7) Makaya notes site is for UFO evidence, calls bias. Irony is explained and asked not to ignore evidence.

8) Makaya claims thousands of people believe Bigfoot and another skeptic questions the number of people believing in Bigfoot.

9) Makaya offers BFRO as information source, skeptic laughs at biased source.

10) Makaya accuses skeptic of ignoring evidence.

How does that look for you, makaya? Learning from the big kids?
 
makaya325 said:
Why not? The incredible mass, fluid movement, sagittal crest, bipedal ape, Broad shouldered
Click to expand...

Kinda leggy for a gorilla isn't she? And sorry, but those don't look much like gorilla boobs either. I'm not sure what they do look like - for all I know they look like real bigfoot boobs, but gorilla? Not quite.
 
makaya325 said:
Bob has little chicken arms, while patty has neanderthal arms
Click to expand...

Look, I don't know where you got your information about Neandertals, but you really need to stop. Every time you mention them, it becomes very, very clear that you've never actually read anything about them. Hell, I'm starting to think you haven't even looked at a picture of Neandertal remains.

Worse, the amount of knowledge you exhibit is inversely proportional to your confidence in said knowledge. Which is really annoying.
 
makaya325 said:
Cameras havent been around for 100's of years, genius.
Click to expand...

Don't recall saying cameras have been around 100s of years, yet, technically, even on that point you're wrong. But let's pretend you're right. Portable cameras have been around for over 50 years, and guess what? No clear pictures of bigfoot....in over 50 years.

Its not impossible, but its nothing to underestimate. One walk in the woods doesnt guarantee you a wolverine
Click to expand...

And yet, somehow we have pictures/videos of wolverines, like these, which were picked up by trail cam.

Or this video:



Or these:
wolverine3.jpg


wolverines.jpg



Got a decent picture/video of squatchy similar to these wolverine vids/pics(the REAL ones on trail cam) yet? Any decent trail cam pics of footy foot yet? No, you don't. You've got plenty of lame excuses though, I'll give you that.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom