• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

Any comment on identifying a ring-tailed cat as a racoon? You showed that people could easily mistake a bear for Bigfoot.
 
Any comment on identifying a ring-tailed cat as a racoon? You showed that people could easily mistake a bear for Bigfoot.

A Racoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable. Sasquatch and a bear are different, one stands on its hind legs, the other has broad shoulders, saggital crest, bipedal, and resembles an upright gorilla
 
A Racoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable.

I gave you some acid before. Are you still on that? A racoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable?

Once again:

cybersniper0009.jpg


You can't tell this...

http://pro.corbis.com/images/JB010459.jpg?size=67&uid={BD0E40A8-1C25-48F4-8495-01FF9E11B493}

...apart from this...

http://cozyland.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/racoon-closeup.jpg

Sasquatch and a bear are different, one stands on its hind legs, the other has broad shoulders, saggital crest, bipedal, and resembles an upright gorilla

Aren't Bigfoots often skinny, no sagittal crest, often run in 4x4 mode, and more human-like in the face? Lots of reports, you know.
 
Last edited:
"A Raccoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable. Sasquatch and a bear are different, one stands on its hind legs, the other has broad shoulders, sagittal crest, bipedal, and resembles an upright gorilla is imaginary."

The essence of good writing is simplicity and brevity.
 
"A Raccoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable. Sasquatch and a bear are different, one stands on its hind legs, the other has broad shoulders, sagittal crest, bipedal, and resembles an upright gorilla is imaginary."

The essence of good writing is simplicity and brevity.

Lets not CLAIM its imaginary just yet. If that is imaginary, then 1000's of people are victims of a mafia of hoaxers for 100's of years aka omnipotent hoaxer
 
Lets not CLAIM its imaginary just yet. If that is imaginary, then 1000's of people are victims of a mafia of hoaxers for 100's of years aka omnipotent hoaxer

Not 1000s, dozens. There are less than 50 people worldwide who actually believe in bgfoot.


(Yes, that's complete BS. I just made it up. But it's up to your high standards of evidence, so we'll let it stand.)
 
Not 1000s, dozens. There are less than 50 people worldwide who actually believe in bgfoot.


(Yes, that's complete BS. I just made it up. But it's up to your high standards of evidence, so we'll let it stand.)

Are you kidding me? You make stupid generalizations about me. There arent dozens. California has over 400 alone
 
Who's ready for some deep-fried Bigfoot enthusiast simmering in a stew of their own words with a rich glaze of hypocrite?:

Excuse me? You ask for a link, i give you one, you ignore it without even reading any reports

Bon apetite!:

How are those reliable? They arent. Ones an ambigious photo of anything, and the second is by a biased source, a proponent source. Ufoevidence.com is basically the same as supporting billy meier's claims

Kitz, then, provided crappy sites?

Makaya325@ unexplained-mysteries.com said:
the bfro is a joke.

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=138409&view=findpost&p=2564188

blue bear/makaya325 @ BFF said:
He would'nt have lasted 5 post on the BFRO
You mean the bfrwoo?

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=24870&view=findpost&p=516113

Yes, makaya never apes skeptics or copies any of their arguments.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom