Exactly.
Using letters instead of words is rude. Stop being lazy and spell out what you want to say.
In kitz's opinion
Exactly.
Using letters instead of words is rude. Stop being lazy and spell out what you want to say.
In kitz's opinion
uff...That 10 mile hike today revealed nothing but a racoon.![]()
Any comment on identifying a ring-tailed cat as a racoon? You showed that people could easily mistake a bear for Bigfoot.
A Racoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable.
Sasquatch and a bear are different, one stands on its hind legs, the other has broad shoulders, saggital crest, bipedal, and resembles an upright gorilla
A Racoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable.
"A Raccoon and ring-tailed cat are nearly indistinguishable. Sasquatch and a bear are different, one stands on its hind legs, the otherhas broad shoulders, sagittal crest, bipedal, and resembles an upright gorillais imaginary."
The essence of good writing is simplicity and brevity.
Lets not CLAIM its imaginary just yet. If that is imaginary, then 1000's of people are victims of a mafia of hoaxers for 100's of years aka omnipotent hoaxer
Not 1000s, dozens. There are less than 50 people worldwide who actually believe in bgfoot.
(Yes, that's complete BS. I just made it up. But it's up to your high standards of evidence, so we'll let it stand.)
Are you kidding me? You make stupid generalizations about me. There arent dozens. California has over 400 alone
Prove it. I need names and addresses.
I feel it coming.
Me: Heres your links
Hitch: Hogwash! None of these are possibly real, bc bf cant possibly exist.
http://bfro.net/GDB/state_listing.asp?state=ca
What bfro.net? That place is worse than youtube.com.
You'll have to do better than that.
Excuse me? You ask for a link, i give you one, you ignore it without even reading any reports
Excuse me? You ask for a link, i give you one, you ignore it without even reading any reports
How are those reliable? They arent. Ones an ambigious photo of anything, and the second is by a biased source, a proponent source. Ufoevidence.com is basically the same as supporting billy meier's claimshttp://www.crystalinks.com/alienimplant.jpgSource for the biological material, please? Oh wait, there is none!
http://www.ufoevidence.org/forums/ForumMessage.asp?ID=5896
Kitz, then, provided crappy sites?
Makaya325@ unexplained-mysteries.com said:the bfro is a joke.
blue bear/makaya325 @ BFF said:You mean the bfrwoo?He would'nt have lasted 5 post on the BFRO