Homeopathy does work

I knew it!

I suspect his first mistake was to have a go at Larsen in his very first post as a new member.

Lucianarchy just can't help himself.

Do I win a prize for spotting him within one post?
 
Ashles said:
I knew it!

I suspect his first mistake was to have a go at Larsen in his very first post as a new member.

Lucianarchy just can't help himself.

Do I win a prize for spotting him within one post?

Yep - a year's supply of homeopathic remedies supplied via emails.

(Edited to add - and whilst it isn't nice that people are willing to lie to join the forum I suppose it is a credit to the forum that they think it is such an important forum that they are willing to prove themselves to be liars just to make a few posts here.)
 
Ashles said:
I knew it!

I suspect his first mistake was to have a go at Larsen in his very first post as a new member.

Lucianarchy just can't help himself.

Do I win a prize for spotting him within one post?
Originally posted by Ashles (the post following DJ's first)
Using your first post to insult a regular poster doesn't give you great credibility Mr Gently.

Please tell me you aren't yet another reincarnation of Lucianarchy.
Have a coconut, Ashles.

Rolfe.
 
Yay! Go me!

Still I hadn't seen all those homeopathic articles before or your summaries, and I'm sure other newer posters may not have either so Dirk Gently was useful in that he has exposed some of us to yet more evidence against homeopathy.
 
Darat said:
Yep - a year's supply of homeopathic remedies supplied via emails.
Well I've got water, sugar pills, all I need is a kettle and some coffee and I'm good to go.
 
Dr. MAS said:
You people are demanding from me to explain how homeopathy does work. I am ready to explain it till you satisfy. If I fail, I will accept my defeat at this forum and will burn my entire homeopathic certifications in the prescence of huge gatherings.
Attention has recently been drawn to Mas's opening post in this thread. Now then, Mas. Do you ever plan on showing us this explanation of how homoeopathy works? So far, you've not even given it a try.

Hans pointed out very correctly that there were two things of interest a homoeopathic proponent might demonstrate.
  • An actual, measurable, quantifiable effect of the remedies on patients or provers
  • A plausible theoretical mechanism whereby some such effect might be reasonably proposed to occur.
In response to the late and unlamented "Dirk Gently", the former has rather been kicked into touch, unless you have some novel evidence we haven't yet seen. And in fact most of your promises here have been to explain how homoeopathy works (or rather might work), within our present understanding of science.

Or, as you yourself offered, you'll burn all those pretty pieces of paper.

So, are you going to get the matches, or are you actually going to try to put together a plausible explanation? Finally?

Or will you simply never be heard from again?

Rolfe.
 
Rolfe said:
Not going to happen, I'm afraid.

(I smelled sock, and vaguely wondered about Xanta, but it was more mundane than that....)

Rolfe.

The ban is good news for me. I hated seeing someone run around making an idiot of himself while using the name of a character I love so much.

What becomes of that username now, Darat? Gone for good? Back into the pool for new users to pick?
 
delphi_ote said:
The ban is good news for me. I hated seeing someone run around making an idiot of himself while using the name of a character I love so much.
I was thinking exactly the same thing.
 
DO YOU AGREE THAT HOMOEOPATHY CANNOT WORK AT 30C?

WILL YOU EXPLAIN YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW IT DOES WORK, IN SCIENTIFIC TERMS??

Rolfe.
 
Non-Sense Homeopath said:
CAN YOU PREDICT ABOUT ME WHO I AM? AND WIN ONE THOUSAND DOLLAR FROM MY SIDE.:D
DR. MAS 9-YEAR OLD SON?

A SKEPTIC WHO WANTS TO MAKE HOMEOPATHS LOOK STUPID?

DR. ADEQUATE?

CHERIE BLAIR?

A TURING TEST COMPUTER CANDIDATE?

SOMEONE WITH A PATHOLOGICAL AVERSION TO ANSWERING DIRECT QUESTIONS?
 
KUMAR WITH AN ATTITUDE?

SOMEONE TOO DUMB TO MAKE IT INTO MED SCHOOL?

ROLFE WITH MULTIPLE PERSONALITY DISORDER AND A CAT ON HER CAPS LOCK KEY?

OR MAYBE----IT'S ME?!!
 
Dr. A Sheikh said:
We also have the same thoughts about you.;) Doesn't matter.
Really? What questions?

The homeopaths are the ones making the claims not me.

The homeopaths are the ones claiming great understanding of simple scientific priniples which they can't back up.

The homeopaths have claimed to be able to explain homeopathy -which they haven't done.

I assume you can't answer any of Rolfe's or BSM's or Zep's questions either.

Here, why don't you have a go Dr. A Sheikh:
Ten questions for homeopaths

Or would you like your own thread to explain homeopathy? I will happily set one up for you.
 
Non-Sense Homeopath said:
CAN YOU PREDICT ABOUT ME WHO I AM? AND WIN ONE THOUSAND DOLLAR FROM MY SIDE.:D

An attention seeking immature little mind? Someone who hasn't yet realised that trolling never does anything more than distract, but that he'll never get all those years he wasted, on nothing more constructive than sitting in front of a screen and flinging his virtual poop at people, back for anything worth living for?

Guys, this desperate little attempt to elicit attention should tip you off to the fact that the current wave of homeopaths are nothing more than a childish joke that's being played; Look at that "nyer nyer, can't guess who I am" post, and then look at his signature. Only one of those two statements can be true. Unless you understand that both are fake in detail, but are "true" in a different sense... the sense that says "Does this statement get me attention, cause a reaction, make people look at me, me, meeeeeee?"

I've already shown it's possible to forge an IP address from anywhere in the world... And if you think it seems a lot of effort to set up the background web pages etc of Dr MAS et all, bear in mind that there are a number of pyschotic trolls out there who would (and I've seen them do so too)... but that they don't have too. Identity theft is very easy to pull off. After all, there is indeed a "Dr Sheikh" in Pakistan. He's on Death Row for Blasphemy, so I don't think he's doing much posting here. But his name is. In the meantime, "1inChrist", trolls on elsewhere, and "Huzzington" copies and pasts his "essays" at Internet Infidels under a different name. Never underestimate the obsessional idiocy of the truly pathetic.

Of course, there was never a "Dr Jihado", that was clealy an immature mind's little joke. Perhaps this is the same immature mind. Who knows, it's so hard to tell when all trolling sinks to the same level of qualitativeless gloop after a while... but it should be quite obvious now that none of these "homeopaths" are here to actually debate anything seriously. For all you know, it's a running joke on some college campus frathouse somewhere, the equivalent of an organised panty raid. I've seen that happen too. And maybe it has again. Either way;

DO NOT FEED THESE ATTENTION SEEKING FOOLS!
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom