Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tony Stark said:
Oh and BobTheCoward, Fast Eddie B is a Republican (I think), who was on the fence about voting for Hillary or not voting. He appears to not be anymore because of this.
Click to expand...

We can't shut down perfectly inoffensive speech because the irrational have a heckler's veto.
 
Bogative said:
Common sense would tell you that some of the 33,000 emails Hillary decided to delete may have been saved on the device found in Wiener's residence, giving the FBI all the reason they need to reopen the investigation because they found emails they previously had no access to.
Click to expand...

Actually no. That isn't common sense at all. Why would anyone do that? If there is incriminating evidence, you ERASE it. You don't save it elsewhere. For the life of me, I can't imagine what they will find. Logic on this doesn't really apply. The available data doesn't call for any conclusions.

What you are doing is wildly speculating. Which is inherently the problem with Comey's letter.
 
Last edited:
BobTheCoward said:
We can't shut down perfectly inoffensive speech because the irrational have a heckler's veto.
Click to expand...
Sure we can if they work for the FBI and have no good reason for their speech. Comey did not have a good reason to tell Congress before even reviewing the emails. And he most certainly knew that Republicans would immediately use it to attempt to harm Hillary and that it would be all over the news.
 
Tony Stark said:
Sure we can if they work for the FBI and have no good reason for their speech. Comey did not have a good reason to tell Congress before even reviewing the emails. And he most certainly knew that Republicans would immediately use it to attempt to harm Hillary and that it would be all over the news.
Click to expand...

I disagree. I think that should be absolutely acceptable.
 
acbytesla said:
Actually no. That isn't common sense at all. Why would anyone do that? If there is incriminating evidence, you ERASE it. You don't save it elsewhere. For the life of me, I can't imagine what they will find. Logic on this doesn't really apply. The available data doesn't call for any conclusions.

What you are doing is wildly speculating. Which is inherently the problem with Comey's letter.
Click to expand...

It's rather like the EIGHT Benghazi investigations, simply going over the same ground again and again. Unless we assume that Clinton actually was handing out classified information like, well, dick pics, then I cannot see what this is going to change. On the other hand a presidential candidate who has the Russians doing favours for them...
 
Fast Eddie B said:
I predict that somewhere in the 650,000 (!) emails on Weiner's laptop is a smoking gun email that will lead to charges against Huma, Hillary or both.

If I'm wrong, I'll gladly admit it was much ado about nothing and I was wrong.
Click to expand...


It appears the Director Commey's letter has influenced at least one person.

FYI even the Director has said only a small portion of the 650K could possibly be related to Clinton.


Bogative said:
Common sense would tell you that some of the 33,000 emails Hillary decided to delete may have been saved on the device found in Wiener's residence, giving the FBI all the reason they need to reopen the investigation because they found emails they previously had no access to.
Click to expand...

Hillary didn't delete any emails.

Common sense tells me the Director's actions on Friday, before the FBI even had legal access to the device in question yet alone read a single email, was intended to create the type of wild speculation and misinformation you posted.
 
Garrison said:
It's rather like the EIGHT Benghazi investigations, simply going over the same ground again and again. Unless we assume that Clinton actually was handing out classified information like, well, dick pics, then I cannot see what this is going to change. On the other hand a presidential candidate who has the Russians doing favours for them...
Click to expand...

She was
 
acbytesla said:
Actually no. That isn't common sense at all. Why would anyone do that? If there is incriminating evidence, you ERASE it. You don't save it elsewhere. For the life of me, I can't imagine what they will find. Logic on this doesn't really apply.
Click to expand...


I guess the same reason they would set up a private server in their home and send classified emails on it – they're not the brightest bulbs in the chandelier.


The available data doesn't call for any conclusions.

What you are doing is wildly speculating. Which is inherently the problem with Comey's letter.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. Law enforcement sources told the Wall Street Journal that there could be thousands of emails, according to the metadata.

The FBI would not have to know what the emails contain to know that they never had access to them simply by comparing sender/receiver, time and dates to emails they previously examined.
 
Tony Stark said:
Comey disagrees. Too close to the election he said. Oddly the election didn't prevent him from writing that letter to Congress weeks later. I wonder why.
Click to expand...

I don't care what he thinks. It doesn't influence what I think is appropriate to announce.
 
My father and brother seem unaffected by Comey's move and believe Clinton should still coast to victory. I see a drop in the betting markets (Clinton is still favored) and polling, and I'm not so sure what the week will bring. I expect her to win, but it will be unnecessarily close.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom