Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Slings and Arrows is absolutely correct. Loretta Lynch did not recuse herself, as I believe, the DOJ Code of Ethics required. Recusal means formal removal from consideration of a criminal case. Since she is the top dog at the DOJ, she should have appointed a deputy or, better yet, an outside counsel to make the final determination.

More blatant rule breaking ! Will no one stop these scofflaws ?

Or, maybe your just wrong again.

Wait, I know - you could simply show us the rules that require the AG to recuse her self if she speaks to the spouse of someone under investigation.
 
If the rest of the RNC is run as well as the first day was, will Clinton get a convention bounce from her opponent, even before the DNC?
 
Trump's polling numbers seemed to have peaked. That when he gains versus Hillary it's because her polling numbers rise and fall. In national polling Trump's numbers are relatively constant around 40%.


Poll: Clinton and Trump Now Tied as GOP Convention Kicks Off

"Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are virtually tied in the polls as the Republican National Convention convenes in Cleveland this week. Clinton now just barely edges out Trump in a direct head-to-head match-up, 46 percent to 45 percent. This is slightly down from the 3-point lead she held in last week's tracking poll numbers."

Read more:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...n-trump-now-tied-gop-convention-kicks-n611936 (July 19, 2016)
 
It's also been two months since a poll of registered voters gave him a lead. Only leads in polls with the lower standard of likely voters and barely in those.

Rasmussen had Trump up by 7 just a few days ago, but it's Rasmussen, so...
 
It's also been two months since a poll of registered voters gave him a lead. Only leads in polls with the lower standard of likely voters and barely in those.

TBF, Trump should get a bump in the polls from the RNC. So this news isn't exactly surprising. It's sustaining that momentum that is the key and this poll isn't necessarily indicative of his overall chance to win. The same should happen for Clinton after the DNC, and the same would be true. Of course, the RNC has been anything but a smooth operating machine, so perhaps the shift is happening outside the party faithful, and it is a harbinger of doom for a successful Trump presidency!
 
ANd the way the GOP Convention is turning out,Trump might not get much of a bump from it......
 
TBF, Trump should get a bump in the polls from the RNC. So this news isn't exactly surprising. It's sustaining that momentum that is the key and this poll isn't necessarily indicative of his overall chance to win. The same should happen for Clinton after the DNC, and the same would be true. Of course, the RNC has been anything but a smooth operating machine, so perhaps the shift is happening outside the party faithful, and it is a harbinger of doom for a successful Trump presidency!

He's needs to turn the message coming out of the convention around but I agree.

Just wait to the post RNC polls come out in the middle of the DNC! Donald is polling relatively low with actually Republicans compared to historical nominees so he could see a bigger boost than usual if some neverTrumpers decide to come home to Republicans. Oh the bed-wetting that will happen on the pollercoaster then.
 
More blatant rule breaking ! Will no one stop these scofflaws ?

Or, maybe your just wrong again.

Wait, I know - you could simply show us the rules that require the AG to recuse her self if she speaks to the spouse of someone under investigation.

I'll tell you what. If you make an obsequious apology for being wrong about the whole "Comey said that Hillary didn't break the law" thing, I'll get you the specific citation in the Code of Federal Regulations. Otherwise, I'm not going to do any work just to have you drop out of the discussion and never admit you were wrong.

Regardless, the argument was about whether or not Loretta Lynch recused herself (she didn't), not about whether or not she should have (although she should have - and she admitted as much through her claim of taking a hands off attitude).
 
I'll tell you what. If you make an obsequious apology for being wrong about the whole "Comey said that Hillary didn't break the law" thing, I'll get you the specific citation in the Code of Federal Regulations. Otherwise, I'm not going to do any work just to have you drop out of the discussion and never admit you were wrong.

Regardless, the argument was about whether or not Loretta Lynch recused herself (she didn't), not about whether or not she should have (although she should have - and she admitted as much through her claim of taking a hands off attitude).
Comey irrefutably told that idiot Jason Chaffetz that Hillary did not break the law.
 
The swiftboating hit Kerry in August and sunk him like a rock.



Also a like voters poll.

The point is, how does Trump, with everything he's done and said, still have a 36% chance of winning? How does ANY reputable poll, like the L.A. Times, have Trump ahead? He's essentially treating his campaign like a practical joke. Clinton should be burying him in the polls. She's up by ONE in the latest NBC poll? :eye-poppi

Imagine plucking Kerry (who was pretty lousy himself) from 2004, and running him against Trump right now. What do you think the result would be? I think he would be crushing it.

There's really only two possibilities: this country is much more misogynistic than anyone thought, or Clinton is one of the worst candidates in history, or some combination of the two. We know from polling that 2/3 of the electorate think Clinton's an untrustworthy liar, and a majority think the FBI should have recommended charges against her. Throw in a healthy dash of sexism, and anyone with an R next to their name is going to be competitive against her.

On the bright side, Trump could have a 46% chance of winning, instead of 36%. Yay.
 
The swiftboating hit Kerry in August and sunk him like a rock.


Similarly, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has promised to deliver an October surprise. He has repeatedly claimed to have copies of the 30,000 missing emails, and that they contain incriminating evidence of a "pay for play" shakedown of foreign governments by the Clinton Foundation and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Should be quite entertaining.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom