Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

[Tony Stark]

Trump thinks he can win California and New York too (though maybe smarter people talked him out of that?) He is a total moron.

 

[acbytesla]

Trump thinks he can win California and New York too (though maybe smarter people talked him out of that?) He is a total moron.

Let him spend money trying to win in both places. Ad buys in SF, LA and NY are the most expensive anywhere. He'll go broke trying to win in them.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Comey Won’t Answer Question About Clinton Foundation

Mr. Comey refused to answer a question from the committee chairman about whether the investigation the bureau conducted extended to the Clinton Foundation, which has faced questions about donations from foreign officials seeking to influence American policy.

“I’m not going to comment on the existence or nonexistence of other investigations,” he said.

“Was the Clinton Foundation tied into this investigation?” asked Mr. Chaffetz [chairman of the House Oversight Committee].

“I’m not going to answer that,” Mr. Comey said.

Read more:
http://www.nytimes.com/live/james-comey-testifies-before-congress/clinton-2 (July 7, 2016)

"Director Comey refused to comment on the existence of a second FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

"Earlier this year, reports surfaced that federal investigators had expanded the probe to include possible “pay for play” allegations between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Director Comey was asked about this in the latter part of his testimony, but he declined to answer the question."

Reference:
6 Most Important Moments From James Comey’s Testimony on Clinton Investigation (July 7, 2016)

 

[Tony Stark]

"Director Comey refused to comment on the existence of a second FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

"Earlier this year, reports surfaced that federal investigators had expanded the probe to include possible “pay for play” allegations between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Director Comey was asked about this in the latter part of his testimony, but he declined to answer the question."

Reference:
6 Most Important Moments From James Comey’s Testimony on Clinton Investigation (July 7, 2016)

Still holding on to the insane idea that their charity will be the silver bullet that finally takes out the Hildebeast I see, even though you turned out to be laughably wrong about emails.

LOL

 

[TheL8Elvis]

"Director Comey refused to comment on the existence of a second FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

"Earlier this year, reports surfaced that federal investigators had expanded the probe to include possible “pay for play” allegations between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Director Comey was asked about this in the latter part of his testimony, but he declined to answer the question."

Reference:
6 Most Important Moments From James Comey’s Testimony on Clinton Investigation (July 7, 2016)

FBI Director Comey specifically says that Hillary did not lie to the FBI.

Do you anything to say about this Slings and Arrows?

So is that a no ? Do you also wish us to pretend you didn't post all the incorrect nonsense you did ?

BTW, how did all the guccifer and wikileaks emails work out for you ?

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Perjury probe ahead for Clinton in email controversy

Hillary Clinton may soon face a second FBI investigation related to her private email use thanks to a criminal referral from congressional Republicans based on misstatements the former secretary of state made under oath.

During the Benghazi committee hearing in October, Clinton repeated several talking points about her emails that were exposed as falsehoods by Comey earlier this week and explored in greater detail at the oversight hearing Thursday.

When asked whether the FBI had looked at inconsistencies in Clinton's congressional testimony, Comey said the agency hadn't factored that hearing into its final decision because it hadn't received a referral from Congress to do so.

"You'll get one," Chaffetz replied.

Read more:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...-clinton-in-email-controversy/article/2595936 (July 8, 2016)

During a 2015 hearing on the Benghazi attack, Hillary Clinton told Congressman Jim Jordan that, "there was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received." FBI Director James Comey refuted that statement Thursday, testifying that some emails on Clinton's server contained markings that indicated classified material.

U.S. Code 18, Section 1001 -- Statements or entries generally:

"Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."​

 

[RobRoy]

During a 2015 hearing on the Benghazi attack, Hillary Clinton told Congressman Jim Jordan that, "there was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received." FBI Director James Comey refuted that statement Thursday, testifying that some emails on Clinton's server contained markings that indicated confidential material.

Yeah, she's said it many, many times. It's practically a meme. But you also know that Comey described why this occurred:

The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails as we did for those available to us. Instead, they relied on header information and they used search terms to try to find all work-related emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 that were remaining on her system at the end of 2014. It’s highly likely that their search missed some work-related emails and that we later found them, for example in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.​

Clinton reported what she'd been advised by her attorneys. That's not a lie.

 

[Crossbow]

During a 2015 hearing on the Benghazi attack, Hillary Clinton told Congressman Jim Jordan that, "there was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received." FBI Director James Comey refuted that statement Thursday, testifying that some emails on Clinton's server contained markings that indicated classified material.

U.S. Code 18, Section 1001 -- Statements or entries generally:

"Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."​

I am glad that the people at the FBI know more about word of the law, the practice of the law, and the intent of the law than you do.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Clinton reported what she'd been advised by her attorneys. That's not a lie.

Hillary Clinton read the emails herself -- emails that had been clearly marked classified. She then lied to Congress, claiming she had never sent or received any emails that contained classified information.

This development means there is still a possibility that she may be indicted for perjury.

Also, indictments regarding the Clinton Foundation are still a realistic possibility.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

So is that a no ? Do you also wish us to pretend you didn't post all the incorrect nonsense you did ?

BTW, how did all the guccifer and wikileaks emails work out for you ?

During a 2015 hearing on the Benghazi attack, Hillary Clinton told Congressman Jim Jordan that, "there was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received." FBI Director James Comey refuted that statement Thursday, testifying that some emails on Clinton's server contained markings that indicated classified material.

U.S. Code 18, Section 1001 -- Statements or entries generally:

"Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."​

Look, another one you will be wrong about.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

Hillary Clinton read the emails herself -- emails that had been clearly marked classified. She then lied to Congress, claiming she had never sent or received any emails that contained classified information.

This development means there is still a possibility that she may be indicted for perjury.
Also, indictments regarding the Clinton Foundation are still a realistic possibility.

Wrong again, all counts.

 

[bonzombiekitty]

I think the Dems think Arizona in play. That would be a nice change.

It seems Arizona is in play. FiveThirtyEight is giving Clinton a projected vote share of 44.9% and Trump 45.4%

 

[varwoche]

Hillary Clinton read the emails herself -- emails that had been clearly marked classified. She then lied to Congress, claiming she had never sent or received any emails that contained classified information.

This development means there is still a possibility that she may be indicted for perjury.

Also, indictments regarding the Clinton Foundation are still a realistic possibility.

<gaping yawn> We're past the point where any and everything you post/predict should be assumed to be false/implausible.

 

[RobRoy]

Hillary Clinton read the emails herself -- emails that had been clearly marked classified. She then lied to Congress, claiming she had never sent or received any emails that contained classified information.

So you're calling FBI Director Comey a liar? Yes, I will certainly give this the consideration it is due.

This development means there is still a possibility that she may be indicted for perjury.

There's no development. But if you'd like to put money on it, I'm happy to give you odds again. However, this time, I will be collecting.

 

[The Big Dog]

Yeah, she's said it many, many times. It's practically a meme. But you also know that Comey described why this occurred:

The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails as we did for those available to us. Instead, they relied on header information and they used search terms to try to find all work-related emails among the reportedly more than 60,000 that were remaining on her system at the end of 2014. It’s highly likely that their search missed some work-related emails and that we later found them, for example in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.​

Clinton reported what she'd been advised by her attorneys. That's not a lie.

Did you mean to post that quote because it makes NO SENSE.

The lawyers did the review in 2014. The marked emails were sent to Clinton before 2013. You appear to be conflating two different issues/lies:

1. Hillary's lie that the emails were not marked
2. Hillary's lie that all of her work related emails had been turned over.

 

[RobRoy]

Did you mean to post that quote because it makes NO SENSE.

I did and it does. I understand it doesn't suit your world view, but dems da facts!

 

[Slings and Arrows]

So you're calling FBI Director Comey a liar?

No.

"When asked whether the FBI had looked at inconsistencies in Clinton's congressional testimony, Comey said the agency hadn't factored that hearing into its final decision because it hadn't received a referral from Congress to do so."

But if you'd like to put money on it, I'm happy to give you odds again.

What odds are you offering?

 

[Cleon]

Oh yay, it looks like the Republicans have another "scandal" to investigate and re-investigate over and over and over again long past the point of viabiliaty, not to mention long past anyone who isn't a partisan hack giving a **** one way or the other.

 

[RobRoy]

No.

"When asked whether the FBI had looked at inconsistencies in Clinton's congressional testimony, Comey said the agency hadn't factored that hearing into its final decision because it hadn't received a referral from Congress to do so."

Oh, I see where you're going with this. I'll ignore the spots where you conflate the two issues. To be clear, you're saying that because the Republicans are threatening new action, you believe this will result in a perjury indictment, is that correct?

What odds are you offering?

Provided I've interpreted what you're actually saying correctly—perjury indictment—I'll give the same odds as before: 10-1 that Clinton will not be indicted on perjury. You game?

 

[The Big Dog]

I did and it does. I understand it doesn't suit your world view, but dems da facts!

My world view is based on the fact that a marked email was sent to Hillary by Monica Hanley on Monday April 9, 2012.

Your world view is based on a claim that Hillary's lawyers did a key word search on emails in 2014.

Mine makes sense.... yours? Not at all.

Those are, as they say, the facts.