Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did you look at the actual article correcting you yet?

This one: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/07/hillary-clinton-classified-emails-error-225194

Take your time.

It seems you have the wrong article because the one you linked says:

The paragraph marked confidential in the 2012 Malawi call sheet was released by State in January of this year. However, a section of the email just below that does not appear to be considered classified now, but was withheld under a FOIA exemption for internal U.S. government deliberations. Another section just below that was classified "Confidential" diplomatic information at the time of release this year. Both of those chunks were withheld in their entirety.

Huh, it was "marked" but "marked in error" and isn't "classified" but is specificically marked as "classified" and is redacted with an unclassify date of 4/7/2027.

Do you think that Kirby thought that people would be dumb enough to take his *********** word for it and not look at the actual document that shows what a liar he is?

Take your time.
 
It seems you have the wrong article because the one you linked says:

Huh, it was "marked" but "marked in error" and isn't "classified" but is specificically marked as "classified" and is redacted with an unclassify date of 4/7/2027.

Do you think that Kirby thought that people would be dumb enough to take his *********** word for it and not look at the actual document that shows what a liar he is?

Take your time.

:dl:

enjoy your cherry picking.
 
It seems you have the wrong article because the one you linked says:



Huh, it was "marked" but "marked in error" and isn't "classified" but is specificically marked as "classified" and is redacted with an unclassify date of 4/7/2027.

Do you think that Kirby thought that people would be dumb enough to take his *********** word for it and not look at the actual document that shows what a liar he is?

Take your time.

Comey DIDN'T THINK SO.
Just a bunch of partisan trolls.
 
Comey DIDN'T THINK SO.
Just a bunch of partisan trolls.

I think you are confusing Comey with Cummings.

Cummings and Kirby partisan trolls?

No they are not just trolls, they are in position to do real damage, like lie about the classified e-mail.

Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 01/29/2016 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 04/07/2027
Thank Christ the big dog is here to show you their lies.
 
I think you are confusing Comey with Cummings.

Cummings and Kirby partisan trolls?

No they are not just trolls, they are in position to do real damage, like lie about the classified e-mail.

Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 01/29/2016 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 04/07/2027
Thank Christ the big dog is here to show you their lies.

No I'm not. I said Comey and I meant Comey. And BTW, if a chihuahua thinks he's the big dog, that's likely to just be a delusion.
 
No I'm not. I said Comey and I meant Comey. And BTW, if a chihuahua thinks he's the big dog, that's likely to just be a delusion.

'k.

Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 01/29/2016 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 04/07/2027
 
Lets see what else I can "cherry pick."

Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 01/29/2016 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 04/07/2027

Oh dear... It seems like Kirby lied, but it is pro-Clinton lies so the "Skeptics" on "iSkep" will lap it up.

cool laughing dog, tho.

Here is the email at issue:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2016/06/10/banda-email/

Kirby lied, Hillary Lied.

Yes, we all know when the choice is between admitting you are wrong or calling someone a liar, you opt for the latter.

Fantastic ! :thumbsup:
 
'k.

Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 01/29/2016 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 04/07/2027

YAWN.....zzzzzzzzzzzz.....zzzzzzz.

Where's that indictment you said was forthcoming?
 
I think it's prudent to remind our Republican fans that as of now only one candidate has a date in court and it ain't Clinton...
 
The Friday morning political talks shows consensus is that Hilary has a pretty bad week, but that Trump managed to totally screw up any hopes of turning it to political advantage with his antics.
 
I think it's prudent to remind our Republican fans that as of now only one candidate has a date in court and it ain't Clinton...

lolz, the folks at Judicial Watch just filed a motion to take her deposition.

Say, did Bill give back all that money he took from the for profit college he was involved in?

lol!
 
lolz, the folks at Judicial Watch just filed a motion to take her deposition.

Say, did Bill give back all that money he took from the for profit college he was involved in?

lol!

That's what Judicial Watch does. They've been conducting a witch hunt on Democrats for as long as I can remember. Did they pick a partisan right wing judge as usual to grant their motion?
 
Did they pick a partisan right wing judge as usual to grant their motion?

:eye-poppi

is this for real?

Judicial Watch files their actions in the DC District Court, where the Judges are randomly assigned.

The motion is pending before U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

Tell you what, why don't you take a gander at who appointed him to the federal bench.

We'll wait.

/still waiting for response on your silly bet post too.
 
Last edited:
:eye-poppi

is this for real?

Judicial Watch files their actions in the DC District Court, where the Judges are randomly assigned.

The motion is pending before U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

Tell you what, why don't you take a gander at who appointed him to the federal bench.

We'll wait.

/still waiting for response on your silly bet post too.

So, my guess the petition won't be granted. Judge roulette didn't work.

And yes, I had you confused with Slings and Arrows.
 
Discuss Clinton, not each other. And be civil and polite while you discuss Clinton, please.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Agatha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom