Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
catsmate said:
It's a classic right-wing anti-Clinton tactic. Despite being scrutinised for a quarter century they've found nothing and thus have to resort to spurious claims and similar sillyness.

Either she’s innocent of all the crimes which they've accused of of, or she’s such a genius at exploiting the legal and governmental levers of this nation that she's by far the best candidate for president ever.
:)
Click to expand...
Seriously, with all the crap the GOP trash have thrown at her the past decades, she must be a freaking master to keep getting away with it. Either that or the GOP scumbags are completely incompetent.
 
Tony Stark said:
Progressive hero and harsh critic of Wall Street Senator Elizabeth Warren, to the shock of nobody with a brain, is going to endorse Hillary soon. I guess that means she is a corrupt tool of the establishment. No seriously, that is what many Bernie Bros think. Those idiots are toxic. I wonder if they will turn on Bernie himself if he endorses Hillary.
Click to expand...

Fanatacism will do that, and social media just makes fanatacism easier and more widespread.
 
16.5 said:
So what do her confidential medical records say then huh if you are so sure that she is not not insane? No answer? Thought so.

/This is like every conversation i have ever had with a shillary about the emails she destroyed. But I get to pretend to be on the other side Wheeeee!
Click to expand...

jhunter1163 said:
One weasel word means your argument is weaksauce. Two weasel words, as highlighted above, means that it's even weaker sauce. As you no doubt know, there is no evidence that Clinton's server was ever compromised. Do try harder next time.
Click to expand...

catsmate said:
It's a classic right-wing anti-Clinton tactic. Despite being scrutinised for a quarter century they've found nothing and thus have to resort to spurious claims and similar sillyness.

Either she’s innocent of all the crimes which they've accused of of, or she’s such a genius at exploiting the legal and governmental levers of this nation that she's by far the best candidate for president ever.
:)
Click to expand...

lol! That didn't take long. Plus Guccifer admitted that he hacked her server (the fact that a Shillary does not believe him does not make it not evidence) plus the lack of more evidence is easily explained by the fact that the FBI investigating Hillary use of her server IS NOT TALKING.

SMILEY!
 
16.5 said:
lol! That didn't take long. Plus Guccifer admitted that he hacked her server (the fact that a Shillary does not believe him does not make it not evidence) plus the lack of more evidence is easily explained by the fact that the FBI investigating Hillary use of her server IS NOT TALKING.

SMILEY!
Click to expand...

The fact that you take the self-serving words of "Guccifer" as evidence tells avid readers all they need to know about how you approach critical thinking.
 
16.5 said:
lol! That didn't take long. Plus Guccifer admitted that he hacked her server (the fact that a Shillary does not believe him does not make it not evidence) plus the lack of more evidence is easily explained by the fact that the FBI investigating Hillary use of her server IS NOT TALKING.

SMILEY!
Click to expand...

Gee the FBI announced just Monday that it could not release anything about Hillary's cowboy server because it would interfere with the investigation into her use of the server.

Oh 16.5, you are so gooood.
 
jhunter1163 said:
One weasel word means your argument is weaksauce. Two weasel words, as highlighted above, means that it's even weaker sauce. As you no doubt know, there is no evidence that Clinton's server was ever compromised. Do try harder next time.
Click to expand...

"The report also disclosed an attempt to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s server in January 2011. It said a “nondepartmental adviser” to Bill Clinton — apparently Bryan Pagliano, who installed the private server — informed the department that he had shut down the system because “someone was trying to hack us and while they did not get in, I didn’t want to let them have a chance.”

The attack continued later that day, prompting another official to write to two of Mrs. Clinton’s top aides, Cheryl D. Mills and Jake Sullivan, to warn them not to send her “anything sensitive.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/us/politics/state-department-hillary-clinton-emails.html

If multiple attempts to hack your email had happened to you, wouldn't you change all your passwords, even if you didn't know if they were successful? I would. When someone tries to hack you, you assume they were successful and change all your logins and passwords just to be safe. I don't see why we should assume anything different, esp. when it's a high profile person like the Sec. of State.

There's also anecdotal evidence from a notorious hacker who claims he got into Clinton's system, and is known to have hacked Bush and Hillary buddy Sydney Blumenthal:

"In March 2013, an adviser to Clinton, Sidney Blumenthal, had his e-mail hacked by "Guccifer" -- the Romanian hacker perhaps best known for revealing George W. Bush's paintings to the world."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...in-registered-the-day-of-her-senate-hearings/
 
Fudbucker said:
"The report also disclosed an attempt to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s server in January 2011. It said a “nondepartmental adviser” to Bill Clinton — apparently Bryan Pagliano, who installed the private server — informed the department that he had shut down the system because “someone was trying to hack us and while they did not get in, I didn’t want to let them have a chance.”

The attack continued later that day, prompting another official to write to two of Mrs. Clinton’s top aides, Cheryl D. Mills and Jake Sullivan, to warn them not to send her “anything sensitive.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/us/politics/state-department-hillary-clinton-emails.html

If multiple attempts to hack your email had happened to you, wouldn't you change all your passwords, even if you didn't know if they were successful? I would. When someone tries to hack you, you assume they were successful and change all your logins and passwords just to be safe. I don't see why we should assume anything different, esp. when it's a high profile person like the Sec. of State.

There's also anecdotal evidence from a notorious hacker who claims he got into Clinton's system, and is known to have hacked Bush and Hillary buddy Sydney Blumenthal:

"In March 2013, an adviser to Clinton, Sidney Blumenthal, had his e-mail hacked by "Guccifer" -- the Romanian hacker perhaps best known for revealing George W. Bush's paintings to the world."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...in-registered-the-day-of-her-senate-hearings/
Click to expand...

as pointed out by the non-partisan Inspector General report, Hillary broke basic government requirements that required her to report the intrusions, but did not do so, because that would have exposed her clandestine "hide documents from FOIA and Congress" system she had put in place during her confirmation hearing.
 
Given the title of the thread, I feel like on every page someone should ask the question:

So, is Hillary done yet?

Well, is she?
 
16.5 said:
as pointed out by the non-partisan Inspector General report, Hillary broke basic government requirements that required her to report the intrusions, but did not do so, because that would have exposed her clandestine "hide documents from FOIA and Congress" system she had put in place during her confirmation hearing.
Click to expand...

The secret email server that everyone who emailed her, including the president, knew about ?

That "clandestine" one ?

:dl:
 
Fudbucker said:
Is it November? Is the "security review" done?
Click to expand...

Almost !

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-repo...doing-in-hillary-clinton-email-investigation/
For all those Hillary Clinton opponents who have been hoping against hope that the likely Democratic presidential nominee will be indicted as a result of the FBI review of Hillary’s email server, CNN has some bad news. According to CNN correspondent Pamela Brown, the FBI is close to wrapping up the “investigation,” and thus far have found “no criminal wrongdoing”:

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

It sounds like they’re really just waiting for Hillary Clinton to be interviewed so they can wrap things up, but if Republicans and Bernie Sanders and the media are counting on Hillary Clinton to suddenly crack under questioning, they haven’t been paying attention.
 
TheL8Elvis said:
Almost !

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-repo...doing-in-hillary-clinton-email-investigation/
For all those Hillary Clinton opponents who have been hoping against hope that the likely Democratic presidential nominee will be indicted as a result of the FBI review of Hillary’s email server, CNN has some bad news. According to CNN correspondent Pamela Brown, the FBI is close to wrapping up the “investigation,” and thus far have found “no criminal wrongdoing”:

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

It sounds like they’re really just waiting for Hillary Clinton to be interviewed so they can wrap things up, but if Republicans and Bernie Sanders and the media are counting on Hillary Clinton to suddenly crack under questioning, they haven’t been paying attention.
Click to expand...

The article is a month old. If it were true, they would have interviewed Clinton by now.
 
RobRoy said:
Keep the faith!
Click to expand...

I really don't want Trump to win, so it's not "faith" to point out that we won't know if Hillary is "done" until the general election, wouldn't you agree?

About her being indicted, it would certainly make things interesting.
 
Fudbucker said:
The article is a month old. If it were true, they would have interviewed Clinton by now.
Click to expand...

Really ? If it's mostly a formality, they couldn't wait a few weeks until after the primary ? I bet the certainly could.

It's simply not going to happen this late in the presidential process. I don't care how "non-political" you think the FBI is, they aren't going to launch the country into turmoil, and neither are the president or DOJ.

--> NOT GONNA GET RECOMMENDED FOR CHARGES.
 
Fudbucker said:
"The report also disclosed an attempt to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s server in January 2011. It said a “nondepartmental adviser” to Bill Clinton — apparently Bryan Pagliano, who installed the private server — informed the department that he had shut down the system because “someone was trying to hack us and while they did not get in, I didn’t want to let them have a chance.”

The attack continued later that day, prompting another official to write to two of Mrs. Clinton’s top aides, Cheryl D. Mills and Jake Sullivan, to warn them not to send her “anything sensitive.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/us/politics/state-department-hillary-clinton-emails.html

If multiple attempts to hack your email had happened to you, wouldn't you change all your passwords, even if you didn't know if they were successful? I would. When someone tries to hack you, you assume they were successful and change all your logins and passwords just to be safe. I don't see why we should assume anything different, esp. when it's a high profile person like the Sec. of State.

There's also anecdotal evidence from a notorious hacker who claims he got into Clinton's system, and is known to have hacked Bush and Hillary buddy Sydney Blumenthal:

"In March 2013, an adviser to Clinton, Sidney Blumenthal, had his e-mail hacked by "Guccifer" -- the Romanian hacker perhaps best known for revealing George W. Bush's paintings to the world."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...in-registered-the-day-of-her-senate-hearings/
Click to expand...

Are you aware that every computer connected to the internet is subjected to attacks on an almost constant basis? My brother used to have a program that showed the constant attacks on his personal PC. It lit up constantly.

Here's one that is a broader view: Watch the web get hacked in real time on this mesmerizing map There are dozens of similar sites showing this fun past time.

That someone was knocking on the door is a given. Closing the system is evidence they had a good firewall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom