Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

[RobRoy]

So what do her confidential medical records say then huh if you are so sure that she is not not insane? No answer? Thought so.

I'm not. Again, the burden would be on you to prove insanity. Not on me to not prove sanity. But now we're covering the same ground and you've being deliberately obtuse.

And thus . . .

It's probably just easier to say, "Fine. She's insane and I'd still vote for her over Trump."

Fine. She's insane. I will still vote for her over Trump any day of the week and twice on Sunday because . . . SQUIRRELS!

 

[Stacko]

Fine. She's insane. I will still vote for her over Trump any day of the week and twice on Sunday because . . . SQUIRRELS!

Continuing on accepting that premise as true, she's been able to fake compassion, empathy and human decency and crafted policies demonstrating those qualities which her opponent has taken opportunity to prove he's pathologically incapable of.

 

[Mike!]

I think the argument could be made that she's a bit paranoid, you know, what with seeing VAST Right Wing conspiracies against her behind every rock and tree.

 

[Tony Stark]

I think the argument could be made that she's a bit paranoid, you know, what with seeing VAST Right Wing conspiracies against her behind every rock and tree.

The GOP trash were in fact trying to destroy her husband's Presidency. I'm sure they will do the same thing to her.

 

[Stacko]

The GOP trash were in fact trying to destroy her husband's Presidency. I'm sure they will do the same thing to her.

They're already recycling the same crap. Donald has already peddled in "totally not" floating the Vince Foster's death was not a suicide ********. He's started hiring an intriguing number of the incompetent hacks that spent the 90's attempting to spread this and similar malarkey.

 

[Marcus]

'Vote Clinton-because at least she's not clinically insane'.

"Vote Clinton-Because do you really want that guy with his finger on the button?'

There you have it, these are the reasons I will vote for that distasteful woman.

 

[Marcus]

Okay Trump is not actually insane, it just seems like a convenient exaggeration to explain his wacadoodleness.

 

[The Big Dog]

Continuing on accepting that premise as true, she's been able to fake compassion, empathy and human decency and crafted policies demonstrating those qualities which her opponent has taken opportunity to prove he's pathologically incapable of.

My favorite was when she voted in favor of the iraq war, supported the coup in central america, ********** up libya and bragged about getting one of history's greatest monsters, henry kissinger to endorse her.

She sounds super.

 

[The Big Dog]

I'm not. Again, the burden would be on you to prove insanity. Not on me to not prove sanity. But now we're covering the same ground and you've being deliberately obtuse.

And thus . . .



Fine. She's insane. I will still vote for her over Trump any day of the week and twice on Sunday because . . . SQUIRRELS!

I thought it was obvious that i was mocking the arguing styles of some of hillary's biggest fans.

 

[varwoche]

I think the argument could be made that she's a bit paranoid, you know, what with seeing VAST Right Wing conspiracies against her behind every rock and tree.

(1) You overlook the fact that there was indeed a concerted effort to get the Clintons by right wing players and (2) you're too literal.

So no, that's bs.

(Enjoy, 16.5)

 

[dudalb]

Okay Trump is not actually insane, it just seems like a convenient exaggeration to explain his wacadoodleness.

I won't get into a clinical debate about Insanity,but will state that Trump is too unstable emotionally to be let near the office of President of the United States.

 

[Trebuchet]

This belongs in the CT forum.

Your accusation the FBI doesn't have free reign to investigate the emails is absurd enough. But the rest goes beyond the pale.

Bush Clinton crime syndicate? That sounds analogous to the John Birchers calling Nixon a communist.

Have you never read Malbec posts before?

 

[The Big Dog]

(1) You overlook the fact that there was indeed a concerted effort to get the Clintons by right wing players and (2) you're too literal.

So no, that's bs.

(Enjoy, 16.5)

Lolz, she said it in 2016 too

It is simply pandering to the ignorant base to cover up the fact they are a couple of narcissistic scumbags.

 

[Marcus]

16.5, I've read a lot of your posts but I'm still not positive who you will be voting for. Not Hillary, obviously, but will you be voting for Trump? Can we at least assume for the sake of argument that those will be the two choices?

 

[Foolmewunz]

The GOP trash were in fact trying to destroy her husband's Presidency. I'm sure they will do the same thing to her.

I prefer the way a Fortune writer put it last year.... "The considerably smaller than vast but nonetheless very well-funded and very dedicated right wing conspiracy."

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Clinton emails could have compromised CIA names

The names of CIA personnel could have been compromised by hackers who may have penetrated Hillary Clinton's private computer server, security experts say.

Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, turned over to the State Department 55,000 emails from her private server that were sent or received when she was secretary of state. Some contained information that has since been deemed classified, and those were redacted for public release with notations for the reason of the censorship.

At least 47 of the emails contain the notation "B3 CIA PERS/ORG," which indicates the material referred to CIA personnel or matters related to the agency.

Read more:
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/1a73...inton-emails-could-have-compromised-cia-names (June 8, 2016)

At least 47 emails sent or received from Crooked Hillary's unencrypted private server contained classified information. Redacted versions of these emails have been released to the public. The reason cited for redaction: "B3 CIA PERS/ORG."

That code, "B3 CIA PERS/ORG," is used to conceal the identities of CIA covert personnel:

"(b)(3) Applies to the Director's statutory obligations to protect from disclosure intelligence sources and methods, as well as the organization, functions, names, official titles, salaries, or numbers of personnel employed by the Agency, in accord with the National Security Act of 1947 and the CIA Act of 1949, respectively."

-- Exemptions to the CIA Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
​

Legal ramifications:
U.S. Code 18 section 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
U.S. Code 18 section 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents

 

[Foolmewunz]

At least 47 emails sent or received from Crooked Hillary's unencrypted private server contained classified information. Redacted versions of these emails have been released to the public. The reason cited for redaction: "B3 CIA PERS/ORG."

That code, "B3 CIA PERS/ORG," is used to conceal the identities of CIA covert personnel:

"(b)(3) Applies to the Director's statutory obligations to protect from disclosure intelligence sources and methods, as well as the organization, functions, names, official titles, salaries, or numbers of personnel employed by the Agency, in accord with the National Security Act of 1947 and the CIA Act of 1949, respectively."

-- Exemptions to the CIA Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
​

Legal ramifications:
U.S. Code 18 section 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
U.S. Code 18 section 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents

More from the Schrodinger's Email team.

 

[jhunter1163]

The names of CIA personnel could have been compromised by hackers who may have penetrated Hillary Clinton's private computer server, security experts say.

One weasel word means your argument is weaksauce. Two weasel words, as highlighted above, means that it's even weaker sauce. As you no doubt know, there is no evidence that Clinton's server was ever compromised. Do try harder next time.

 

[Tony Stark]

Progressive hero and harsh critic of Wall Street Senator Elizabeth Warren, to the shock of nobody with a brain, is going to endorse Hillary soon. I guess that means she is a corrupt tool of the establishment. No seriously, that is what many Bernie Bros think. Those idiots are toxic. I wonder if they will turn on Bernie himself if he endorses Hillary.

 

[catsmate]

One weasel word means your argument is weaksauce. Two weasel words, as highlighted above, means that it's even weaker sauce. As you no doubt know, there is no evidence that Clinton's server was ever compromised. Do try harder next time.

It's a classic right-wing anti-Clinton tactic. Despite being scrutinised for a quarter century they've found nothing and thus have to resort to spurious claims and similar sillyness.

Either she’s innocent of all the crimes which they've accused of of, or she’s such a genius at exploiting the legal and governmental levers of this nation that she's by far the best candidate for president ever.