Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
varwoche said:
The conspiracy section is found this way --->. :boggled:

Your infantile histrionics are off-topic and best kept to yourself, in the interest of signal to noise.
Click to expand...
Oh, but you have robbed me of the chance to display how being put back on ignore has wounded me to the quick! :D
 
The_Animus said:
Again the suggestion you get is "Crooked Hillary Bernie".

Why is there no "Crooked Hillary" by itself?
Click to expand...
The reason is simple - it just isn't a popular search term.

This isn't some some kind of conspiracy, but merely a result of how Google's algorithms work. Google has billions of search phrases in its database, but only a few of them will fit in the instant predictions file. And what goes in it has to cover the entire spectrum of subjects, not just political memes. "Crooked Hillery" doesn't get in by itself for the simple reason that not enough people are searching for it.

WildCat said:
Does this look like it's an unpopular search term to you?
Click to expand...
"Numbers represent search interest relative to the highest point on the chart. If at most 10% of searches for the given region and time frame were for "pizza," we'd consider this 100. This doesn't convey absolute search volume."
 

Attachments

  • search.jpg
    search.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
"vast right wing conspiracy"? Not a Conspiracy theory.

Mentioning that google autofill returns "Crooked Hillary Bernie"? Conspiracy theory.

lolz.
 
Roger Ramjets said:
The reason is simple - it just isn't a popular search term.

This isn't some some kind of conspiracy, but merely a result of how Google's algorithms work. Google has billions of search phrases in its database, but only a few of them will fit in the instant predictions file. And what goes in it has to cover the entire spectrum of subjects, not just political memes. "Crooked Hillery" doesn't get in by itself for the simple reason that not enough people are searching for it.


"Numbers represent search interest relative to the highest point on the chart. If at most 10% of searches for the given region and time frame were for "pizza," we'd consider this 100. This doesn't convey absolute search volume."
Click to expand...

Why are you checking it relative to "Hillary" and "Bernie" instead of the predictive terms that come up such as "Crooked Hill", "Crooked Hips", and "Crooked Hillary Bernie" as seen in the link below.

https://www.google.com/trends/explo...ooked Hips&date=today 3-m&cmpt=q&tz=Etc/GMT+5

Explain why all those other terms which are searched less come up in predictive search but not "Crooked Hillary".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The_Animus said:
Saw there is a thread for this topic in the Computers and Internet section which is probably more appropriate.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=307713
Click to expand...

And I, in turn, hadn't seen that the delusional had been working this meme in this thread. I only saw the computer thread.

Summary for interested readers:
The Computers/Internet thread has been moved to Conspiracy Theories where it belongs. This is a case of limited information posters not understanding how predictive text works in Google. Nothing more.

It's funny, though, that the complete klutzes who are arguing this nonsense now find themselves in CT on the other side. Two of them were noted 911 CT debunkers back in their primes, when they were still honest.
 
sunmaster14 said:
It's nice to see that Thomas Friedman is still as shallow a thinker as ever.
Click to expand...
Really? The Pulitzer board didn't agree, in fact the last time they gave him an award (his third) it was for:
...his clarity of vision, based on extensive reporting, in commenting on the worldwide impact of the terrorist threat.
Click to expand...
But they you disagree with his views so he must he a "shallow thinker".
:rolleyes:
 
newyorkguy said:
How about this one (from a PBS report)?



Were there emails sent on the private domain that contained classified information? I don't think anyone knows.
Click to expand...
But that was a good, Republican, server. That's fine, no investigation needed.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
She's also frequently belittled as having no accomplishments of her own, she's only where she is because of her husband's accomplishments.
Click to expand...

The same thing happened to Barack Obama. And Dubya. And I think Reagan got dismissed as a Hollywood dilettante from time to time.

The concept of riding on someone else's coat tails was invented long before Hillary Rodham was born. The only double standard here is yours, imagining it's somehow special when applied to her.
 
Hillary Could Face A 10-Year Prison Stint If Her Server Was Hacked

Hillary Clinton and her supporters have steadfastly maintained that her private email server posed no threat to U.S. security. But that’s not true, as the recent inspector general’s report and comments from a former counterintelligence official show.

The FBI hasn’t released the findings of its own investigation yet, so we don’t yet know how extensive the hacking and penetration of Hillary’s server by foreign intelligence was.

Under the Espionage Act it is a felony for a federal official to “knowingly remove classified material without the authority to do so and with the intention of keeping that material at an unauthorized location.” That alone can lead to a one-year prison sentence. If the classified material is then made available to an “unauthorized person,” it can lead to 10 years in prison — 15 years if the information identifies a U.S. covert agent.

Read more:
http://www.investors.com/politics/e...0-year-prison-stint-if-her-server-was-hacked/ (June 3, 2016)
Click to expand...


There are thousands of missing emails that Crooked Hillary has yet to turn over to the FBI. If even one those email messages identifies the name of a U.S. covert agent, then under the Espionage Act, Crooked Hillary could face a 15 year prison sentence.

Reference:
Office of Inspector General's Report on Clinton Email
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom