Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
The_Animus said:
Not necessarily, though one might question why most of the men you associate with behave that way. Especially when people tend to associate more with people who are similar to them.
Click to expand...

I think that it seems to be an attitude. Most of them I only associated with because I had to, i.e. for work or sports. A lot of the things they say make me rather sick and I certain would not repeat them here word for word, but I'm sure you can guess a lot of it, mostly aimed at female co-workers. Given the choice, I'd rather spend time with women, I like them far better than men.
 
#DropOutHillary, because if you get indicted after the convention, we're stuck with Trump.
 
bruto said:
Because it's easier to be stupid than it is to think?
Click to expand...

During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.

A. Gore Cripes if he had said he invented it, he would not have seemed like such a pretentious twat.
 
Hillary victory fund donate gives 1% to other Democrats and 99% goes to Hillary.

To be fair, though, one of her Pacs is paying people to say nice things about her on the internet.
 
Steve said:
The same Al Gore who "invented the internet"?
Click to expand...

TheL8Elvis said:
Why is this still a "thing" ?
Click to expand...

Is it, really?

Skeptic Ginger said:
Political misquotes: The 10 most famous things never actually said
Click to expand...

I know that. Hence the " " 's in my post

Skeptic Ginger said:
Because when you correct the record, more than a few people will forget the correction and revert back to remembering the erroneous thing.
Click to expand...

Part of the point I was attempting to make. I was curious to see if the anti-Clinton posters would run with this for awhile. Seems that mostly I managed to agitate some of the more knowledgeable participants.

bruto said:
Because it's easier to be stupid than it is to think?
Click to expand...

C'mon people!! It was just a short riff off Slings and Arrows' apparent belief that Gore speaking at the same event as Trump 10 years ago has some relevance to current events. I'm trying to join in with the US politics discourse at the juvenile level I see from many posters in the myriad threads. I guess I have not managed that yet. I will practice some more and maybe try again another time.
 
dudalb said:
Because he is betting people will not look at his posting history.....
Click to expand...
Enh. Over the past few months, my own view has shifted from...

Any Pub > Hillary

To...

Any Pub > Hillary > Bernie

To...

Trump > Any Other Pub > Bernie > Hillary

To...

Trump > Bernie > Any Other Pub > Hillary

To, finally:

Bernie > Trump > Any Other Pub > Hillary
 
theprestige said:
Bernie > Trump > Any Other Pub > Hillary
Click to expand...

That is pretty close to where my conservative brother is. Last I talked to him* he was at:

Any Other Pub>Bernie>Trump>Hillary

Which is philosophically different from you, but practically the same since no other Pub is in the race.




*And yes, this does come up every single time I talk to him.
 
dudalb said:
Because he is betting people will not look at his posting history.....
Click to expand...

LOLZ! Now that is funny.

Folks, not liking Hillary is just plain good sense, and you don't have to be Republican to see that.

Further, I am not a Barack fan either, but that goes back to the US Senate Primary in '04. Hynes for life, yo
 
16.5 said:
The obvious response would be: why in the hell did it take you so long, why didn't you just release them in the first place instead of your infantile excuses.

However, lets all get on the same page:

WE DEMAND THAT ALL CANDIDATES IMMEDIATELY RELEASE TRANSCRIPTS OF THEIR PAID SPEECHES.

Who else is with me?
Click to expand...

Not me. This isn't about speech transcripts generally, for me. I mean, if you're concerned about about Trump's relationship with the ten thousand people he gave a motivational/infomercial speech to ten years ago, by all means raise your concerns and demand those transcripts. And in the mean time, do your due diligence and see what you can find from other sources.

But don't expect me to extend the same treatment to every other speech by every other candidate, just because you have specific concerns about Trump.

Me? I have questions about Hillary's relationship with Goldman Sachs. Those questions won't be answered by the transcripts of other speeches by other candidates to other audiences.

Nor will those questions be answered by telling me to focus on getting answers for questions I'm not even asking. That bit of misdirection may work for some, but it doesn't work for me at all.
 
16.5 said:
During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.

A. Gore Cripes if he had said he invented it, he would not have seemed like such a pretentious twat.
Click to expand...

That means he voted to appropriate some money, not that he invented it. Vanity Fair ran an article in 2007 -- often referenced in discussions of media failures -- about how unfairly the media treated Gore in 2000 while they gave Bush a free pass, pretty much based on the idea that Gore was a tiresome technonerd and Bush would be a great guy to have a beer with, even though Gore was so much smarter, more experienced and more knowledgable than Bush. The media effectively made Bush President before the election got to the Supreme Court. And the lighthearted coverage of Trump -- instead of his countless frauds, lies, threats, bankruptcies, etc., etc. -- is cut from the same cloth.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/10/gore20071
 
Steve said:
Is it, really?



I know that. Hence the " " 's in my post



Part of the point I was attempting to make. I was curious to see if the anti-Clinton posters would run with this for awhile. Seems that mostly I managed to agitate some of the more knowledgeable participants.



C'mon people!! It was just a short riff off Slings and Arrows' apparent belief that Gore speaking at the same event as Trump 10 years ago has some relevance to current events. I'm trying to join in with the US politics discourse at the juvenile level I see from many posters in the myriad threads. I guess I have not managed that yet. I will practice some more and maybe try again another time.
Click to expand...

Sorry I didn't get it. :blush:
 
#dropouthillary is trending all day.

Blue Nation Review declares it despicable and sexist (Blue Nation review is of course owned by Clinton stooge David Brock), article get retweeted by Brook's pac and Hillary's other stooges.

Damn, Goebbels would be proud!
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hacker-guccifer-i-got-inside-hillary-clinton-s-server-n568206
The Romanian hacker who first exposed Hillary Clinton's private email address is making a bombshell new claim -- that he also gained access to the former Secretary of State's "completely unsecured" server.

"It was like an open orchid on the Internet," Marcel Lehel Lazar, who uses the devilish handle Guccifer, told NBC News in an exclusive interview from a prison in Bucharest. "There were hundreds of folders."
 
applecorped said:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hacker-guccifer-i-got-inside-hillary-clinton-s-server-n568206
The Romanian hacker who first exposed Hillary Clinton's private email address is making a bombshell new claim -- that he also gained access to the former Secretary of State's "completely unsecured" server.

"It was like an open orchid on the Internet," Marcel Lehel Lazar, who uses the devilish handle Guccifer, told NBC News in an exclusive interview from a prison in Bucharest. "There were hundreds of folders."
Click to expand...

I thought it was the Benghazi Committee that found the email account.

From your link:
When pressed by NBC News, Lazar, 44, could provide no documentation to back up his claims, nor did he ever release anything on-line supporting his allegations, as he had frequently done with past hacks. The FBI's review of the Clinton server logs showed no sign of hacking, according to a source familiar with the case.
Click to expand...

It appears to be yet another false accusation made against Clinton that the news media runs with, without vetting.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom