Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure why 16.5 expects anyone to believe that he is really a Bernie supporter and would vote for him in the GE.
 
Argumemnon said:
Isn't 16.5 a Republican?
Click to expand...
Almost certainly. Or at least a right winger. And definitely a fanatical Clinton hater. He pretends to be a Bernie supporter because he believes she is more vulnerable to attack from the left. Republican SuperPACs have admitted to doing the same thing.
 
Tony Stark said:
Almost certainly. Or at least a right winger. And definitely a fanatical Clinton hater. He pretends to be a Bernie supporter because he believes she is more vulnerable to attack from the left. Republican SuperPACs have admitted to doing the same thing.
Click to expand...

He's going to be a bit sad when she's sworn to the oval office next year.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
"I have a lot of experience dealing with men who sometimes get off the reservation in the way they behave and how they speak." -- Hillary Clinton on CNN (April 29, 2016)

It sounds like Hillary has "men" issues.

Is she a sexist?
Click to expand...

Personally, most of the men I know are moronic when it comes to women and how to treat them. They are rude crude and obnoxious and think that women are little more then there to make their day, especially so when in a group with no women present. The majority of them think with what's between their legs rather than their ears when it comes to women.

Does that make me sexist?

As to the transcripts. Has anyone ever considered the fact that even if she did release them, you'd never know if they were altered or not anyways.
 
Last edited:
PhantomWolf said:
...

As to the transcripts. Has anyone ever considered the fact that even if she did release them, you'd never know if they were altered or not anyways.
Click to expand...
I imagine Trump can't use this given his million dollar speeches are likely part of the fake real estate university scam. His speech transcripts are going to be very interesting.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I imagine Trump can't use this given his million dollar speeches are likely part of the fake real estate university scam. His speech transcripts are going to be very interesting.
Click to expand...


Approximately 75,000 people attended the March 2006 'Real Estate Wealth Expo' and heard Donald Trump's speech.

Trump was paid the big bucks because he is a big draw. Thousands of people paid the price of admission just to hear what he had to say; there was nothing nefarious about it.

Other speakers at the Expo included: Tony Robbins, Robert Kiyosaki, Suze Orman and Alan Greenspan.
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
Approximately 75,000 people attended the March 2006 'Real Estate Wealth Expo' and heard Donald Trump's speech.

Trump was paid the big bucks because he is a big draw; thousands paid the price of admission just to hear what he had to say. There was nothing nefarious about it.

Other speakers at the Expo included: Tony Robbins, Robert Kiyosaki, Suze Orman and Alan Greenspan.
Click to expand...
I don't know about Greenspan and I never heard of Kiyosaki and I see no reason to look him up. But Robbins and Orman are infomercial sellers, scamming people by claiming to have the secret to your success. Trump University was based on the same business model: a fraud. Make a million, but my book/tapes/dvds whatever. Total scam.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I don't know about Greenspan and I never heard of Kiyosaki and I see no reason to look him up. But Robbins and Orman are infomercial sellers, scamming people by claiming to have the secret to your success. Trump University was based on the same business model: a fraud. Make a million, but my book/tapes/dvds whatever. Total scam.
Click to expand...


Oh, I forget to mention, Al Gore was one of the speakers.
 
16.5 said:
The obvious response would be: why in the hell did it take you so long, why didn't you just release them in the first place instead of your infantile excuses.

However, lets all get on the same page:

WE DEMAND THAT ALL CANDIDATES IMMEDIATELY RELEASE TRANSCRIPTS OF THEIR PAID SPEECHES.

Who else is with me?
Click to expand...

You can demand all you like but in order for that to happen all parties would need to agree to it. Most if not all of my clients are very reluctant for any of the work that I do for them (the intellectual property if you will) is released into the public domain. In some cases that's because it is commercially confidential, in other cases it's because it's covered by data protection legislation and mostly because it's none of your gosh darn business.

If Hillary does release the transcripts of her speeches then they will be forensically analysed for scandal - real or imagined and if none is found (which is almost impossible given how much will have been said and how carefully the examination will be) then there will be a call for the *real* transcripts to be released.
 
The Don said:
If Hillary does release the transcripts of her speeches then they will be forensically analysed for scandal - real or imagined and if none is found (which is almost impossible given how much will have been said and how carefully the examination will be) then there will be a call for the *real* transcripts to be released.
Click to expand...
Exactly, we're talking people with the same brain functions as those that found nefarious actions with JFK, the moon landings, 9/11 and Sandy Hook.
 
The Don said:
You can demand all you like but in order for that to happen all parties would need to agree to it. ...
If Hillary does release the transcripts of her speeches then they will be forensically analysed for scandal - real or imagined and if none is found (which is almost impossible given how much will have been said and how carefully the examination will be) then there will be a call for the *real* transcripts to be released.
Click to expand...

No all parties would not. Bernie already had released his, there is literally nothing stopping Hillary, although the preemptive excuse making on her behalf is pretty nifty.
 
Hillary Clinton has been "looking into" releasing her transcripts for 89 days. #ReleaseTheTranscripts
 
PhantomWolf said:
Personally, most of the men I know are moronic when it comes to women and how to treat them. They are rude crude and obnoxious and think that women are little more then there to make their day, especially so when in a group with no women present. The majority of them think with what's between their legs rather than their ears when it comes to women.

Does that make me sexist?
Click to expand...

Not necessarily, though one might question why most of the men you associate with behave that way. Especially when people tend to associate more with people who are similar to them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom