• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Hilarious Steven Jones article

papasmurf

Thinker
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
147
I just read this 41 page paper of total nonsense by Steven E Jones.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/...rldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf

I think we should all read it, then come on here and smear it and make fun of it.

It will be a jolly good time.

Here are some of my favorite parts:

1. He actually thinks the molten material flowing from the southeast corner of wtc2 could be molten iron from a thermite reaction rather than molten aluminum mixed with bubble gum!


2. He actually thinks both buildings falling completely symmetrical from different impacts is an oddity, when its so obvious that those buildings should have fallen like that!

3. He thinks the destruction of the core collumns into hundreds of pieces is unaccounted for! Those fires were HUGE!

4. He thinks there is molten metal in the basements of all three buildings! NIST didn't find any!


What is the matter with this guy?

I want to tear this guy to shreds; he is truther trash. Somebody give me something to read that totally destroys this paper!


Thanks for showing me the light JREF!

I almost got brainwashed by the truthers and their terrorist propaganda!
 
What a weak attempt at a troll...

And the first thing you post after your suspension, too. Huh...
 
Hmm. It appears that you have significant difficulties with veracity, so I see no point in even pretending to take this thread seriously.

Well, did you read the paper? I just want to laugh about how funny it is. I can't believe millions of people listen to this guy. I read all 41 pages and found it to be utter rubbish. Nonsense.

What do you guys think? Don't comment unless you've read the paper, otherwise you won't understand the jokes.
 
I just read this 41 page paper of total nonsense by Steven E Jones.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/...rldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf

I think we should all read it, then come on here and smear it and make fun of it.

It will be a jolly good time.

Here are some of my favorite parts:

1. He actually thinks the molten material flowing from the southeast corner of wtc2 could be molten iron from a thermite reaction rather than molten aluminum mixed with bubble gum!


2. He actually thinks both buildings falling completely symmetrical from different impacts is an oddity, when its so obvious that those buildings should have fallen like that!

3. He thinks the destruction of the core collumns into hundreds of pieces is unaccounted for! Those fires were HUGE!

4. He thinks there is molten metal in the basements of all three buildings! NIST didn't find any!


What is the matter with this guy?

I want to tear this guy to shreds; he is truther trash. Somebody give me something to read that totally destroys this paper!


Thanks for showing me the light JREF!

I almost got brainwashed by the truthers and their terrorist propaganda!

There is a Conspiracy Theory section of the Forums. If you start reading some of the threads and links therein you will find exactly what you are afraid of. It will take weeks to slog through it all, but I am confident that every possible question has been asked and answered at least a dozen times. Happy Reading!
 
There is a Conspiracy Theory section of the Forums. If you start reading some of the threads and links therein you will find exactly what you are afraid of. It will take weeks to slog through it all, but I am confident that every possible question has been asked and answered at least a dozen times. Happy Reading!

Conspiracy section?

Where?

Wait, what am i doing here again?
 
Well, did you read the paper?
Yes, several iterations of it over the past couple of years - he's edited it several times.

I can't believe millions of people listen to this guy.

Nobody with two or more arcing brain cells listens to this guy. And your obvious attempt at trolling is, well, pathetic.

Here's something to occupy your time viz Jones and discussions about him here. Read that instead of wasting others' time here.
 
Conspiracy section?

Where?

Wait, what am i doing here again?

Well, based on this admission that you do not want answers, I would say trolling. I am not really the person to ask though - what do you think you are doing here?
 
Yes, several iterations of it over the past couple of years - he's edited it several times.



Nobody with two or more arcing brain cells listens to this guy. And your obvious attempt at trolling is, well, pathetic.

Here's something to occupy your time viz Jones and discussions about him here. Read that instead of wasting others' time here.

I've looked through the threads, nothing substantial on Steven Jones. I made this thread to discuss specific issues in the paper i cited. Since you have read, would you be so kind to name 3 significant fallacies in the paper
?

btw, steven jones can edit his paper as much as he wants, just as NIST does all the time on every single aspect of their story.

Good night everyone. I can't wait to wake up tomorrow and read all this hilarious stuff about Jones and his loony thermate theory.
 
I've looked through the threads, nothing substantial on Steven Jones. I made this thread to discuss specific issues in the paper i cited. Since you have read, would you be so kind to name 3 significant fallacies in the paper
?

btw, steven jones can edit his paper as much as he wants, just as NIST does all the time on every single aspect of their story.

Good night everyone. I can't wait to wake up tomorrow and read all this hilarious stuff about Jones and his loony thermate theory.

you looked through all the Jones threads in 8 minutes?
 
Last edited:
I've looked through the threads, nothing substantial on Steven Jones. <snipped the rest of the blather>

Clearly, you haven't read the threads, then.

But I'm all out of troll food so, no, I am not going to respond to your nonsense any further. Have fun under the bridge.
 
He actually thinks both buildings falling completely symmetrical from different impacts is an oddity, when its so obvious that those buildings should have fallen like that!

LOL your a comedian?
 
He actually thinks both buildings falling completely symmetrical from different impacts is an oddity, when its so obvious that those buildings should have fallen like that!

LOL your a comedian?
he seems to think he is, i would have thought his sense of humor (if thats what you can call it) would be right up your alley
 
Well, did you read the paper? I just want to laugh about how funny it is. I can't believe millions of people listen to this guy. I read all 41 pages and found it to be utter rubbish. Nonsense.

What do you guys think? Don't comment unless you've read the paper, otherwise you won't understand the jokes.


I know you're trying to be funny, but what you are saying is some serious Truth(tm). Here's how I will agree with you, you might not understand all of this:

1. I agree that the paper is hilarious / ridiculous.
2. I can't believe millions of people listen to this guy, either. In fact, I don't, given how small and fringe the 9/11 conspiracy cult is.
3. I've read more than 41 pages of Steven Jones tripe and am not surprised that you found each and every one of these particular ones to be complete garbage. That's his M.O.
 
Last edited:
Now this was boring. I wake up expecting to see at least 1 thing wrong in the Steven Jones article, and all i get is "someone call the idiot police".

Please. I would love for you to share some of your favorite hilarious moments of Steven's article here, that's what this thread is for.
 
I just read this 41 page paper of total nonsense by Steven E Jones.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/...rldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf

I think we should all read it, then come on here and smear it and make fun of it.

It will be a jolly good time.

Here are some of my favorite parts:

1. He actually thinks the molten material flowing from the southeast corner of wtc2 could be molten iron from a thermite reaction rather than molten aluminum mixed with bubble gum!


2. He actually thinks both buildings falling completely symmetrical from different impacts is an oddity, when its so obvious that those buildings should have fallen like that!

3. He thinks the destruction of the core collumns into hundreds of pieces is unaccounted for! Those fires were HUGE!

4. He thinks there is molten metal in the basements of all three buildings! NIST didn't find any!


What is the matter with this guy?

I want to tear this guy to shreds; he is truther trash. Somebody give me something to read that totally destroys this paper!


Thanks for showing me the light JREF!

I almost got brainwashed by the truthers and their terrorist propaganda!


What's the matter with Jones? He's a crackpot who was rebuked by his department for failing to maintain professional standards. For years, he has tweaked a contaminated dust sample without coming up with anything of consequence.

What's the matter with you? You're a run-of-the-mill conspiracy liar, ignorant and ineducable, who brings absolutely nothing new to the table.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom