• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

HI and Interpol.

Your hilarious penchant for public humilaition continues, and we are once again allowed to laugh at your ignorance of pretty much everything.

Apparently you saw "President" and thought "Golly, he must be in charge 'cause that's what presidents do!".

But unfortunately for you, and fortunately for those of us who enjoy laughing at all the stupid things you say, the Secretary General serves as the chief executive officer of Interpol, not the President.

So whatever dispersions you want to cast upon a President of Interpol who served for less than a year seven years after 9/11 took place, you go right ahead. It has absolutley no bearing on how Interpol functions as an intelligence and criminal investigation agency since the President of Interpol is not directly involved in those aspects.

Anway, if you're done proudly displaying how much you don't know:


Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

Because they can only assume or pretend just like you. How sad. To do otherwise could only make waves and jepordize their funding or expansion in the Global War on Terror gravy train.

You really need to read my answers before you claim I didn't answer.

Well not really.
 
Because they can only assume or pretend just like you. How sad. To do otherwise could only make waves and jepordize their funding or expansion in the Global War on Terror gravy train.

Finally the truth comes out.

After embarrassing yourself repeatedly by advertising you're laughable failures to understand how Interpol functions in a sad pretense that they were either not interested or not able to investigate 9/11, you finally man up and admit what pretty much everyone already knew you thought: Interpol is in on it.

One can only assume the reason you didn't simply say this to begin with is because even you recognise how patently absurd such a belief is.

Now that you've implicated an international organization consisting of almost 200 nations (including one that was invaded by the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11), you're basically just a hair's breadth away from implicating the entire planet.

Out of curiousity, who do think is not in on the conspiracy and with so many people involved from all over the world, who exactly is the conspiracy meant to fool, and why?
 
Finally the truth comes out.

After embarrassing yourself repeatedly by advertising you're laughable failures to understand how Interpol functions in a sad pretense that they were either not interested or not able to investigate 9/11, you finally man up and admit what pretty much everyone already knew you thought: Interpol is in on it.

One can only assume the reason you didn't simply say this to begin with is because even you recognise how patently absurd such a belief is.

Now that you've implicated an international organization consisting of almost 200 nations (including one that was invaded by the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11), you're basically just a hair's breadth away from implicating the entire planet.

Out of curiousity, who do think is not in on the conspiracy and with so many people involved from all over the world, who exactly is the conspiracy meant to fool, and why?

I think you and all the other debunkers who have put all your faith into the international intelligence community should at least wait until the jury is in on the Interpol shamed president before you go and get let down yet again.

In fact you would be wise to not commit yourself to endorsing domestic reports on 9/11 sponsored by your own shamed President.

I just hate watching you all let down time and time again.

Just looking out for ya all okay?

Have a good night. I hope my little spanking didn't sting too bad.
 
I think you and all the other debunkers who have put all your faith into the international intelligence community should at least wait until the jury is in on the Interpol shamed president before you go and get let down yet again.

In fact you would be wise to not commit yourself to endorsing domestic reports on 9/11 sponsored by your own shamed President.

I just hate watching you all let down time and time again.

Just looking out for ya all okay?

Have a good night. I hope my little spanking didn't sting too bad.

I see you're back to incoherent rhetoric and avoiding the hard questions.

Back on topic:

Now that you've implicated an international organization consisting of almost 200 nations (including one that was invaded by the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11), you're basically just a hair's breadth away from implicating the entire planet.

Out of curiousity, who do think is not in on the conspiracy and with so many people involved from all over the world, who exactly is the conspiracy meant to fool, and why?
 
Yes that was my answer.

See my comments of it in the last post.

See? You don't even know what "We the People" means.

What do you mean?

I know that it appears in the US Constitution, and it refers in that sense at least, to the people of the United States.

The problem is that I fail to see how it actually means anything to me.

All you know is bend over, ask for more, and say please thank you may I have another.

Prove it.

Now where is your answer about Interpol only having an acting President right now? Why is that?

I didn't know I had to answer that question.

Funny how you seemed to ignore most of my post by the way...
 
I see you're back to incoherent rhetoric and avoiding the hard questions.

Back on topic:

Now that you've implicated an international organization consisting of almost 200 nations (including one that was invaded by the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11), you're basically just a hair's breadth away from implicating the entire planet.

Out of curiousity, who do think is not in on the conspiracy and with so many people involved from all over the world, who exactly is the conspiracy meant to fool, and why?

What conspiracy? Is it a conspiracy to not have access to any evidence and to assume something is true?
 
What conspiracy?

That would be the conspiracy you alluded to five posts ago.

Perhaps you have trouble maintaining consistency in your retarded arguments. Allow me to refresh your memory:
Homeland Insurgency said:
Because they can only assume or pretend just like you. How sad. To do otherwise could only make waves and jepordize their funding or expansion in the Global War on Terror gravy train.

The "conpiracy" would be the part I bolded where you claim Interpol is aiding the U.S. government in covering up the murder of 3,000 people by keeping their mouths shut in hopes of financial benefit.

Is it a conspiracy to not have access to any evidence and to assume something is true?

There you go again trying to frame the question in a manner more conducive to your nonsense answers.

Let's refresh your memory again:
Homeland Insurgency said:
If someone claims there hasn't been enough of an investigation to know what happened on 9/11 it means they haven't seen enough evidence.

johnny karate said:
Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

Homeland Insurgency said:
Because they can only assume or pretend just like you. How sad. To do otherwise could only make waves and jepordize their funding or expansion in the Global War on Terror gravy train.

You're suggesting Interpol, an international intelligence and criminal investigation agency comprised of almost 200 countries, has not expressed suspicions regarding the events of 9/11 because they are on board the "Global War on Terror gravy train", whatever that's supposed to be.

You have now implicated nearly 200 other nations of colluding with the U.S. government after the fact in their conspiracy to fake a major terrorist attack as a means to imperialistic conquest. Including among these nations are countries that have been openly critical and even hostile towards America, and even one that was actually invaded in the aftermath of 9/11.

This preposterous theory begs the question: Why would a nation powerful enough to bring all these other countries into line even bother with a cover up to begin with?

If this much of the world is involved in the conspiracy, what is the need for the conspiracy?
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom