HI and Interpol.

[Homeland Insurgency]

"Response", do you actually understand the word? Or are you just intent on posting more and more words that have zero meaning and show everybody you are incapable of responding to the OP or any other questions that members have put to you?

If , for reasons that to date you have failed miserably to state,the international community/Interpol has not responded to the events of Sept 11th in the way you expected, than get in touch with them and tell them. If you believe you have something of value to add to the international investigation and response then you has no reason whatsoever not to present your evidence to them. You sign petitions, you have sent letters, so why not send Interpol a letter? Get your evidence together along with all your questions, compose an email and ask them. What is stopping you? Do you not wish them to know the “truth”? Do you not want the international community to support you and your quest for the “truth”? Maybe you could point them in a new direction. Maybe you don’t know their contact details. Here you go.

http://www.interpol.int/Public/contact.asp

Let us know how you get along.

Actually I and I guess most other people who have seen your dreadful excuses and derailing attempts, already know the answer.

Well would you look here a whole new link for me to try and back up someone else’s assertions. Didn't you do this already?

I didn't ask how international community or Interpol responded to the events of 9/11. I ask what kind of investigation they did into the events both leading up to and on 9/11. I asked you to backup your assumptions and not with just their assumptions and leaps of faith.

And I feel fine about anyone lurking or following this thread so continue.

 

[johnny karate]

If someone claims there hasn't been enough of an investigation to know what happened on 9/11 it means they haven't seen enough evidence.

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

 

[stateofgrace]

Well would you look here a whole new link for me to try and back up someone else’s assertions. Didn't you do this already?

I didn't ask how international community or Interpol responded to the events of 9/11. I ask what kind of investigation they did into the events both leading up to and on 9/11. I asked you to backup your assumptions and not with just their assumptions and leaps of faith.

And I feel fine about anyone lurking or following this thread so continue.

Once again you live up to all expectations and fail miserably to answer with a cohesive point. Well done, it takes a special kind of skill to achieve the monumental failure you have done so, in this thread, in making any sort of comprehensible or meaningful argument.

To date, Homeland you have be presented with an opening posting which quotes some of the responses from the international community, you have failed to address it.

You have been asked some elementary questions.

Why does the international community /Interpol appear not to support the TM? You have failed to respond.

Is there a single intelligence agency, anywhere that agrees with truthers? You have failed to respond.

Why aren’t Interpol and the international community claiming there as not been an adequate investigation? You have failed to respond.

Who exactly are you accusing of being involved in mass murder? You have failed to respond.

What exactly are your conclusions? You have failed to respond.

Why don’t you get in touch with the international community and share your information with them? You have failed to respond.

There are many more questions, not the assertions you claim to have been made, but questions which you have failed utterly and completely to address. In summary you have failed to address a single point that as been put you, you have failed to offer up anything close to a rational argument.The only thing you have succeeding in is to shown everybody here what a complete and utter waste of time it is trying to debate with you.

There is no assertion, no claims, just a massive response to a wicked act. You cannot even acknowledge this response. You have and keep demanding a reinvestigation, yet here in this very thread you have been offered the chance to get in touch with an organisation outside of the US, who’s members made a solemn pledge to bring to justice all those involved. You have failed to get in touch, you have failed to make the slightest effort to actually try and get what you demand.

All in all, you have failed completely.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

Unless you can show that Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agency conducted their own investigation into both the events leading up to and on 9/11 and exactly what evidence they had access to I can only assume they are making leaps of faith just like you.

 

[mchapman]

Why does Johnnyy Karate think interpol have any jurisdiction? Does he think they are the worlds police?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Once again you live up to all expectations and fail miserably to answer with a cohesive point. Well done, it takes a special kind of skill to achieve the monumental failure you have done so, in this thread, in making any sort of comprehensible or meaningful argument.

Yeah right. Just cause you say so debunker because that's how debunking works in your world.

To date, Homeland you have be presented with an opening posting which quotes some of the responses from the international community, you have failed to address it.

What does their response prove? You have failed to answer this.

You have been asked some elementary questions.

Why does the international community /Interpol appear not to support the TM? You have failed to respond.

You're really hung up on appearances huh? Why?

Is there a single intelligence agency, anywhere that agrees with truthers? You have failed to respond.

What investigation have they done to agree or disagree with what claim exactly?

Why aren’t Interpol and the international community claiming there as not been an adequate investigation? You have failed to respond.

No I've responded. They're assuming for all I know. What did they investigate?

Who exactly are you accusing of being involved in mass murder? You have failed to respond.

Unlike you no one. There would need to be an investigation first.

What exactly are your conclusions? You have failed to respond.

That you, Interpol, or the Flying Wallendas who also haven't questioned the official version can't know for certain what happened on 9/11 based on any investigation done to date.

Why don’t you get in touch with the international community and share your information with them? You have failed to respond.

If you have no reason to contact them to back up your own nonsense why the hell should I? I don't believe they know anything. How could they?

Oh that's right you can't answer that.

There are many more questions, not the assertions you claim to have been made, but questions which you have failed utterly and completely to address. In summary you have failed to address a single point that as been put you, you have failed to offer up anything close to a rational argument.The only thing you have succeeding in is to shown everybody here what a complete and utter waste of time it is trying to debate with you.

Oh I've addressed it all. That's what you're worried about. The appearance of getting owned.

There is no assertion, no claims, just a massive response to a wicked act. You cannot even acknowledge this response. You have and keep demanding a reinvestigation, yet here in this very thread you have been offered the chance to get in touch with an organisation outside of the US, who’s members made a solemn pledge to bring to justice all those involved. You have failed to get in touch, you have failed to make the slightest effort to actually try and get what you demand.

More faith in solemn pledges. lol

WHAT DID THEY INVESTIGATE? WHAT COULD THEY? Answer it.

All in all, you have failed completely.

Another assertion based on fear?

You claim no foreign intelligence agency has questioned that there was a complete 9/11 investigation. You assume and provide no evidence of your assertion other then some measures Interpole has implemented well after 9/11. It proves nothing.

Now why don't you tell me why none of the following seasoned Intelligence professionals believe what debunkers claim?

"I am forced to conclude that 9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war, and I am forced to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indict (not necessarily convict) Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and others of a neoconservative neoNazi coup d'etat and kickoff of the clash of civilizations. – Robert David Steele– U.S. Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer for twenty years. Secondranking civilian (GS14) in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence from 19881992 and a member of the Adjunct Faculty of Marine Corps University. Also former clandestine services case officer with the CIA. 25year U.S. military and intelligence career. Currently CEO of OSS.net

"Only secret services and their current chiefs – or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations – have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude." – General Leonid Ivashov – Joint Chief of Staff of Russian Armies on 9/11/2001. Chief of Department for General Affairs in Soviet Union’s Ministry of Defense. Chief of Military Cooperation Department at Russian Federation’s Ministry of Defense. Secretary of Council of Defense Ministers of Community of Independant States (CIS)

"Why isn't the WMD story being investigated? Why hasn't anybody been held accountable for 9/11? We held people accountable after Pearl Harbor. Why has there been no change in command? Why have there been no political repercussions? Why has there [not been] any sort of exposure on this?" "Did bin Laden act alone, through his own al-Qaida network, in launching the attacks? About that I'm far more certain and emphatic: no." – Robert Baer– Former CIA Case Officer, Specialist in Middle East, Directorate of Operations. Awarded Career Intelligence Medal. 21-year CIA veteran. Author of two nonfiction books about CIA operations, See No Evil and Sleeping with the Devil

"Bin Laden does not have the capabilities for an operation of this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about al-Qaida as if it was Nazi Germany or the communist party of the Soviet Union, I laugh because I know what is there. Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaida has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of organisation and sophistication." – Mohamed Hassanein Heikal – Former Foreign Minister of Egypt. Adviser to Egyptian Presidents Nasser and Sadat. Renowned Journalist and Editor.

"I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission." – Melvin A. Goodman – Senior Analyst, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974-1976. Former Division Chief and Senior Analyst, Office of Soviet Affairs, CIA,1976 - 1986. Professor of International Security, National War College 1986-2004. Currently Senior Fellow, Center for International Policy and Adjunct Professor of International Relations, Johns Hopkins University. Author or co-author of five books on international relations.

"The best I could say about it is they really botched the job by not really going into the real failures. … At worst, I think the 9/11 Commission Report is treasonous. And if you look at what the word 'treason' means in the Webster’s Dictionary, it’s a betrayal of a trust." – Bogdan Dzakovic – 14-year Counterterrorism expert, Security Division of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Team Leader of FAA's Red (Terrorism) Team. Former Team Leader in Federal Air Marshal program. Former Coast Guard officer. Witness for 9/11 Commission.

"One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?" – General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Commanding General of Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), 1981 - 1984. Also commanded U.S. Army’s Intelligence Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.

“After contact by two separate members of the Able Danger team … the 9/11 [Commission] staff refused to perform any in-depth review of investigation of the issues that were identified to them. … It was their job to do a thorough investigation of these claims – to not simply dismiss them based on what many now believe was a “preconceived” conclusion to the 9/11 story they wished to tell. … I consider this a failure of the 9/11 staff ... as is evidenced by their recent, groundless conclusion that Able Danger’s findings were “urban legend.” – Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Military Intelligence Officer, Defense Intelligence Agency. Member of Able Danger effort to target Al Qaeda’s global structure. Former Chief of the Army’s HUMINT [Human Intelligence] program. Awarded the Bronze Star for bravery for the first of his two combat tours to Afghanistan. 23-year military intelligence career.

Reading through the official 9/11 report, I quickly lost my focus – apparently emulating the 9/11 commission over the past 20 months. One wonders if the entire commission wasn't secretly replaced by pod people from the old Soviet Central Committee. I naively expected more constructive and useful information in the report." – Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Staff Member, Office of Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force veteran.

"I, like the others, am frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case." – Major Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps – Former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991-1998.

The floor is yours.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Why does Johnnyy Karate think interpol have any jurisdiction? Does he think they are the worlds police?

Who knows? Santa and the Easter Bunny haven't questioned the investigation either.

 

[johnny karate]

Unless you can show that Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agency conducted their own investigation into both the events leading up to and on 9/11 and exactly what evidence they had access to I can only assume they are making leaps of faith just like you.

You're not paying attention. This has nothing to do with any investigation that might have been conducted by Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agency or access to evidence they may have had. This has to do with their opinion on the very public and widely known conclusions of the investigation conducted by agencies of the U.S. government.

You said:

If someone claims there hasn't been enough of an investigation to know what happened on 9/11 it means they haven't seen enough evidence.

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

 

[johnny karate]

Why does Johnnyy Karate think interpol have any jurisdiction? Does he think they are the worlds police?

Who knows? Santa and the Easter Bunny haven't questioned the investigation either.

Interpol stands for International Criminal Police Organization. You can read more about who they are an how they operate here. I suggest you both do so to avoid making any more hilariously ignorant remarks in the future.

From the Interpol website, courtesy of stateofgrace:

The Interpol General Assembly, meeting in Budapest from 24 to 28 September 2001 at its 70th session:
RECALLING the murderous attacks perpetrated against the world’s citizens in the United States of America on 11 September 2001,
SHOCKED by the loss of and injury to thousands of innocent lives from over 80 countries, including scores of police officers, firefighters and other public servants called to the scene to aid those in need,
DETERMINED that this abhorrent violation of law and of the standards of human decency must be condemned by every civilized person,
CONSCIOUS of our special responsibility as upholders of the laws of almost every nation of the world,
BEARING IN MIND the consistent record of Interpol at past General Assembly sessions in opposing all acts of terrorism, most recently at the 67th session in Cairo (1998) and the 68th session in Seoul (1999),
CONDEMNS these attacks as cold-blooded mass murder;
CONSIDERS that they constitute a crime against humanity;
COMMENDS the General Secretariat for its swift and decisive response to the 11 September tragedy in establishing an immediate and permanent 24-hour capability to respond to all Interpol member countries’ needs;
HONOURS the memory of the law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency workers and private citizens who selflessly gave their lives to save others;
SHARES in the grief of all those who have been touched by this tragedy and other tragedies caused by terrorism;
REITERATES its unwavering commitment to the 'Cairo Declaration against Terrorism' (AGN/67/RES/12) and calls for enhanced international police and judicial collaboration to tackle terrorism and organized crime more effectively, for example by exploring all opportunities to co-ordinate legal, judicial and operational approaches;
EMPHASIZES the importance of making full use of the services available through Interpol to secure the arrest of fugitive offenders, to improve information sharing between member countries, to develop analysis of the threat more effectively and to facilitate the timely sharing of good practice;
REQUESTS that the General Secretariat afford the highest priority to the issuance of Interpol Red Notices for terrorist offenders whose arrest is sought by member countries and to accelerate the creation of an international database of counterfeit, forged and stolen identity documents;
URGES member countries to develop robust systems for the monitoring of suspicious financial transactions linked to terrorist activities in order to improve the ability of competent authorities to freeze such assets and so disrupt the funding of terrorism;
SOLEMNLY PLEDGES that the Organization and each of its Members endorsing the present resolution will collaborate without reservation, to the fullest extent permitted by law, in identifying every individual who assisted in committing these acts and bringing those who were responsible for them to justice.

Source: http://www.interpol.int/public/ICPO/.../AGN70RES5.asp

Now that you two have been educated, how about it HI:

If someone claims there hasn't been enough of an investigation to know what happened on 9/11 it means they haven't seen enough evidence.

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

 

[stateofgrace]

Yeah right. Just cause you say so debunker because that's how debunking works in your world.



What does their response prove? You have failed to answer this.



You're really hung up on appearances huh? Why?



What investigation have they done to agree or disagree with what claim exactly?



No I've responded. They're assuming for all I know. What did they investigate?



Unlike you no one. There would need to be an investigation first.



That you, Interpol, or the Flying Wallendas who also haven't questioned the official version can't know for certain what happened on 9/11 based on any investigation done to date.



If you have no reason to contact them to back up your own nonsense why the hell should I? I don't believe they know anything. How could they?

Oh that's right you can't answer that.



Oh I've addressed it all. That's what you're worried about. The appearance of getting owned.



More faith in solemn pledges. lol

WHAT DID THEY INVESTIGATE? WHAT COULD THEY? Answer it.



Another assertion based on fear?

You claim no foreign intelligence agency has questioned that there was a complete 9/11 investigation. You assume and provide no evidence of your assertion other then some measures Interpole has implemented well after 9/11. It proves nothing.

Now why don't you tell me why none of the following seasoned Intelligence professionals believe what debunkers claim?



The floor is yours.

Dear God.

This thread is about the international response.

Do you understand?

If for reasons that you continually fail to state, you feel the international response is not adequate, then state them. Examples of the international response are laid out in the OP, which you have once again failed to address, as you have yet again failed to address anything. You have done nothing, posted nothing again of any substance.

The response from Interpol and the international community is directly related to the events of Sept 11th. They have pledged, solemnly to bring to justice all those involved. If you believe the inernational community has failed in this pledge then state why, state what you would like them to do to forefill this pledge and state why you will not submit your evidence to them to help them forefill this pledge.

Do you understand?

It is not about what they may have or have not investigated.

IT is about the response.

The response is not one of support for USG involvement, do you understand? They are not like you calling for a reinvestigation, do you understand?

So why is that?

I have never asked you ever to substantiate anything I have posted, I have asked you time and time again why, if you feel the response is not correct, will not get in touch yourself with Interpol and simply ask them, do you understand? Why will you not share your information with them? If you believe they are not aware, don’t know anything, then what is stopping you telling them? Why don't you quote your own sources to the them?

In fact why bother ? This will be my last response to you, period, are you now going on ignore, your continue dodging, ridiculous derailing and franking now childish rhetoric about getting "owned", singles you out as a child and nothing more.

Pathetic, truly pathetic.

Welcome to ignore.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Dear God.

This thread is about the international response.

Do you understand?

If for reasons that you continually fail to state, you feel the international response is not adequate, then state them. Examples of the international response are laid out in the OP, which you have once again failed to address, as you have yet again failed to address anything. You have done nothing, posted nothing again of any substance.

The response from Interpol and the international community is directly related to the events of Sept 11th. They have pledged, solemnly to bring to justice all those involved. If you believe the inernational community has failed in this pledge then state why, state what you would like them to do to forefill this pledge and state why you will not submit your evidence to them to help them forefill this pledge.

Do you understand?

It is not about what they may have or have not investigated.

IT is about the response.

The response is not one of support for USG involvement, do you understand? They are not like you calling for a reinvestigation, do you understand?

So why is that?

I have never asked you ever to substantiate anything I have posted, I have asked you time and time again why, if you feel the response is not correct, will not get in touch yourself with Interpol and simply ask them, do you understand? Why will you not share your information with them? If you believe they are not aware, don’t know anything, then what is stopping you telling them? Why don't you quote your own sources to the them?

In fact why bother ? This will be my last response to you, period, are you now going on ignore, your continue dodging, ridiculous derailing and franking now childish rhetoric about getting "owned", singles you out as a child and nothing more.

Pathetic, truly pathetic.

Welcome to ignore.

God can't help you. I know your OP pointed to response.

I want you to tell everyone what it proves in your mind. Can you even quote anyone commenting on the official version from Interpol or any other International Intelligence agency?

Never mind. You keep pretending you're the only one who can ask questions.

Pretend, truly pretend.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

Learn a new trick already. This one stopped working a long time ago.

What does it prove Johnny?

 

[Wildy]

Homeland Insurgency

I don't know if you have noticed this, but you aren't actually answering the question.

In fact you are doing everything in your power to not answer it.

So why do you think that groups like Interpol aren't calling for a new investigation into 9/11? Is it because they are part of some grand conspiracy? Are they all just idiots, or sheeple, or something like that?

Do you accept that no intelligence agency around the world has actually called for a new investigation into 9/11?

Why exactly do you believe that the investigation already undertaken by the US is not satisfactory? Is it because they don't agree with what you want to believe? What fatal flaw is there in the US investigation?

Who would conduct this "new investigation"?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Homeland Insurgency

I don't know if you have noticed this, but you aren't actually answering the question.

In fact you are doing everything in your power to not answer it.

Oh I answered it multiple times. Here I'll get one for you.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4089149&postcount=84

Didn't you notice or are you lazy?

So why do you think that groups like Interpol aren't calling for a new investigation into 9/11? Is it because they are part of some grand conspiracy? Are they all just idiots, or sheeple, or something like that?

Assumptions like you maybe? I mean what else could they do? A need for more financing maybe? Wet their beak in the fountain of global war on terror? I mean they have grown a little since 9/11 haven't they? Maybe they have some corruption too. Maybe you should look it up.

Do you accept that no intelligence agency around the world has actually called for a new investigation into 9/11?

I except that none of them have the power to demand as much.

Why exactly do you believe that the investigation already undertaken by the US is not satisfactory? Is it because they don't agree with what you want to believe? What fatal flaw is there in the US investigation?

Read my quotes from intelligence experts. I share their views. No I'm not getting that for you too lazy one.

Who would conduct this "new investigation"?

You. Me. We the people. Invite Interpol. Maybe they'll learn something.

 

[johnny karate]

Learn a new trick already. This one stopped working a long time ago.

No, it's actually continuing to work and will continue to work as long as you keep dodging the question.

What does it prove Johnny?

It proves that the world's largest international intelligence and criminal investigation agency, compromised of almost two hundred countries from around the world, many of which lost citizens in the 9/11 attacks, sees none of the flaws or inconsistensies in the official version of events that uninformed Internet crackpots see.

And it proves you're afraid to answer questions inconvenient to your ideology.

It proves you are fraud and intellectually dishonest.

It proves that all your bravado and arrogance is tantamount of nothing because you have nothing.

It proves that you live in a myopic, delusional little fantasy world.

In short, it proves you are wrong.

Once again:

If someone claims there hasn't been enough of an investigation to know what happened on 9/11 it means they haven't seen enough evidence.

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

 

[Corsair 115]

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

Because, of course, they're all in on it! That's why it's called the New World Order.

Learn a new trick already. This one stopped working a long time ago.

You owe me one irony meter, since your comment above just broke the one I was using.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Hey debunkers? Who is presently the acting president of Interpol and why do they only have an acting President? What happened to the one before?

Well so much for "solemn pledges to justice" and all the other dribble stateofgrace was appealing to for lack of anything else.

It really must be discouraging to keep continuing to be let down by your heroes time and time again.

But I'll give Interpol and their acting President one thing. I wish we were so far ahead in this country to be up to our acting President pending review. No such luck though.

 

[johnny karate]

Hey debunkers? Who is presently the acting president of Interpol and why do they only have an acting President? What happened to the one before?

Well so much for "solemn pledges to justice" and all the other dribble stateofgrace was appealing to for lack of anything else.

It really must be discouraging to keep continuing to be let down by your heroes time and time again.

But I'll give Interpol and their acting President one thing. I wish we were so far ahead in this country to be up to our acting President pending review. No such luck though.

Your hilarious penchant for public humilaition continues, and we are once again allowed to laugh at your ignorance of pretty much everything.

Apparently you saw "President" and thought "Golly, he must be in charge 'cause that's what presidents do!".

But unfortunately for you, and fortunately for those of us who enjoy laughing at all the stupid things you say, the Secretary General serves as the chief executive officer of Interpol, not the President.

So whatever dispersions you want to cast upon a President of Interpol who served for less than a year seven years after 9/11 took place, you go right ahead. It has absolutley no bearing on how Interpol functions as an intelligence and criminal investigation agency since the President of Interpol is not directly involved in those aspects.

Anway, if you're done proudly displaying how much you don't know:

If someone claims there hasn't been enough of an investigation to know what happened on 9/11 it means they haven't seen enough evidence.

Why aren't Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agencies making this claim?

 

[Wildy]

Oh I answered it multiple times. Here I'll get one for you.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4089149&postcount=84

Didn't you notice or are you lazy?

Hang on, this was your answer?

Unless you can show that Interpol or any other foreign intelligence agency conducted their own investigation into both the events leading up to and on 9/11 and exactly what evidence they had access to I can only assume they are making leaps of faith just like you.

How the hell is that an answer? But it does call for some interesting logic though. I guess you will be shutting up about a new investigation now right. I mean none of us can show that you conducted your own investigation into both the events leading up to an on 9/11 and exactly what evidence you had access to, the only conclusion is that you are making a leap of faith.

Assumptions like you maybe? I mean what else could they do? A need for more financing maybe? Wet their beak in the fountain of global war on terror? I mean they have grown a little since 9/11 haven't they? Maybe they have some corruption too. Maybe you should look it up.

What the hell does the bit I've bolded mean?

I except that none of them have the power to demand as much.

So your answer is? Funny how a yes/no question is quite hard for you to answer.

Read my quotes from intelligence experts. I share their views. No I'm not getting that for you too lazy one.

So you agree with 10 intelligence people which in all probability is a very small percentage of intelligence officers?

You. Me. We the people. Invite Interpol. Maybe they'll learn something.

I fixed it for you. I don't really see why I should have to do an American investigation for Americans.

What exactly could Interpol learn from a bunch of people who most likely have all their experience of investigating things and forensic science from watching CSI?

And would this investigation be a proper one, or one of the kangaroo court investigations that the "truthers" like to peddle?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Hang on, this was your answer?

Yes that was my answer.

See? You don't even know what "We the People" means.

All you know is bend over, ask for more, and say please thank you may I have another.

Now where is your answer about Interpol only having an acting President right now? Why is that?