Help create a JREF recommended science books list?

The proper title of Hofstadter's book is Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. It belongs in Philosophy of Science, along with Edmund O. Wilson's Consilience. He coined the word.

I too would vote for The Meme Machine by Susan Blackmore. Cognitive Science, I think.

Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos by M. Mitchell Waldrop for the Math section.
And I'd concur that Gleick's Chaos goes on the list.

For the Biology section, At Home In the Universe by Stuart Kauffman
The Lives of a Cell, by Lewis Thomas

For the History of Science section,
The Dream Machine, another good Waldrop book (and how I came upon his Complexity).
The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov. The Good Doctor leads us from the Greeks to the neutrino. This comprises the original three-volume set, Understanding Physics, comprised of Motion, Sound, and Heat, Light, Magnetism, and Electricity, and The Electron, Proton, and Neutron, as well as including additional material abstracted and rewritten from The Neutrino. You'll know your way around the major branches of physics fairly well, and also around the history of the title.

For the Physics section,
The Force of Symmetry, the best relatively non-technical treatment of the current physical understanding of force and matter that I have seen. Absolutely the best explanation of the Laws of Spin and Statistics for bosons and fermions I have ever seen. A watershed book for me.
I too liked Six Easy Pieces, but I think that
QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter is more than worthwhile.
The Feynman Lectures on Physics, known to a couple generations of physics majors as "The Red Books," probably should go on the list, but with a note that they are not for beginners. This is the real deal, and you'll know a fair bit about how physicists use calculus when you're done. You should have been exposed to calculus enough that you won't get lost, though it's probably not necessary to have taken a class in the immediate past.
I concur with the recommendation of both of Brian Greene's books. I also like Penrose's The Road to Reality, but agree that it is a very tough read.
I very much liked Heinz Pagels' Perfect Symmetry. It is an excellent lead-in to The Elegant Universe; gives you an idea of the intellectual climate into which string theory dropped.
No physics bookshelf could possibly be complete without The Black Book: Gravitation. The definitive tome, by three of the masters of the field: Kip Thorne (he of the infamous bet with Hawking), John Archibald Wheeler, and Charles Misner. EXTREMELY difficult. You will not get through this book without a good understanding of calculus. This is college curriculum, and not for freshmen.
And an oldie but a goodie: Relativity, by the master himself: Albert explains his theory for the sophisticated intellectual (though not necessarily the physics major). Highly accessible, and the best possible introduction to the theory, by the man who invented it.

That'll do to go on with. Having just moved, and facing the prospect of another move in the not-too-distant future, though not nearly so far, I have absolutely no intention of unpacking about 40 boxes of books until the situation clarifies itself, or we are done moving.
 
Now that there's a fair few books on the list the problem (a good problem!) is to ensure quality over quantity and that the list doesn't become too unwieldly to be really useful, suggestions on how to maintain quality control welcomed - my own opinions;

1) Each sub section should have 1 (or 2 max) "must read" first books - ideally ones which span the whole area, are exceptionally well written and can spark an interest in the rest of the section. Further books in the category could be slightly more area specific, more suitable to read with some knowledge of the subject etc etc.

I don't know how much of a "must read" Brusca and Brusca's Invertebrates would be, but as I work with invertebrates, I tend to get a bit annoyed that people, when discussing zoology, seem to use only vertebrates as examples for this or that phenomena, when more or less all animals are invertebrates. So this book could easily be placed towards the end of any "must read" list. It's essentially a listing of all invertebrate groups and their characteristics, with some anecdotes thrown in.

Here's the amazon entry for the edition of Medical Folklore I have. Again, it's not really a "must read", but more of a nice addition to an already extensive library.
 
For the History section:

Playfair's Commercial and Political Atlas and Statistical Breviary, by William Playfair

It's a modern reprint of two works by Playfair, written at the end of the 18th Century (I can't add links yet...). Very early (and interesting) use of visualisation techniques (charts, line graphs, etc.) to represent financial/economic figures. The intro is quite interesting as well.
 
Science books, eh?

I liked Oliver Sacks' A Philosopher On Mars even better that the other Sacks books listed above - there's an especially great story about a hari krishna who was assumed by the acolytes to have reached some higher plane of consciousness when he was actually under the ravages of a brain tumor, but also the usual fascinating tales of perception and the functioning of the brain.

I liked Stephen J Gould's Full House as much as any of his other collections.

Isaac Asimov has written some great books explaining science to the layman and undoubtedly several belong on this list. A collection of his called Marvels Of Science is among my favorite.

And Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman is the most approachable book on Physics that I have ever read.

I recall this book from my teen years but can't remember the title. It was the true stories of various medical detective cases, where a French doctor figures out what is behind mysterious deaths using great investigative techniques and deductive reasoning. Absolutely fascinating and perfect for budding skeptics.
 
Hi there everyone-this is my first post!

I recommend :

Big Bang by Simon Singh

Fermat's Last Theorem by Simon Singh
 
hiya germaine -

A couple of good suggestions...

welcome to the forum :)
 
My recommendations apart from those already on the list:

The Mind's I - Douglas R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett

This book is somewhat easier that Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. I know several people who could not make it through the latter but really enjoyed the former.

The Burning House: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Brain - Jay Ingram
The Barmaid's Brain and Other Strange Tales from Science- Jay Ingram
The Velocity of Honey - Jay Ingram


I like Ingram's books simply because he addresses fun things that most people overlook as too common to be science. Why do barmaids at Oktoberfest spill so little beer? Does toast really land butter side down more often? Easy to read, well explained and documented and yet often an admission that there is no clear answer. Fundamental science at its very best.

Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud - Robert Park

Parks is one of the few scientist who is not afraid to drag the foolishness of his fellow scientists out into the public view and point out exactly where they screwed up. This book is an expansion on some of the many themes discussed on his weekly "What's New" site. A great book for explaining how science can be bastardized for personal gain and how one can recognize when it is happening.
 
Robyn M. Dawes: House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth

William Broad & Nicholas Wade: Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science

---

If anyone would like to do some reviews, I could stick them on the SkepticWiki, there's a section for book reviews which really ought to be longer.
 
thanks for all the suggestions/recommendations so far....just an update, darat is working on some forum modifications to create a book review area - you can see the rough outline here

once that's up and running, then the choice is either to have a free for all with anyone able to post any book review, a controlled area to ensure quality rather than quantity or maybe a mix of both....

I like the idea of a mix - with control to ensure that there remains a "top few" must reads in each topic area, but with a free for all review posting to give breadth of interest....
 
thanks for all the suggestions/recommendations so far....just an update, darat is working on some forum modifications to create a book review area - you can see the rough outline here

once that's up and running, then the choice is either to have a free for all with anyone able to post any book review, a controlled area to ensure quality rather than quantity or maybe a mix of both....

I like the idea of a mix - with control to ensure that there remains a "top few" must reads in each topic area, but with a free for all review posting to give breadth of interest....

I was trying out your link, but access was denied (yes, I was logged in).:(

And I like the idea of a mix as well. The question is, who will decide what books belong to the "top few"? A rating system like on amazon?
 
I was trying out your link, but access was denied (yes, I was logged in).:(

And I like the idea of a mix as well. The question is, who will decide what books belong to the "top few"? A rating system like on amazon?

the link works for me....maybe i have been endowed with special forum powers :D

If a rating system can be introduced that would be great, if not, some form of editorial control should be easy enough to set up....i'm sure there'll be plenty of willing volunteers if necessary :)
 
The link doesn't work for me either - "insufficient priviledges..."

I also like the idea of a mix - perhaps moderators can assign a lead review for each book and then the review can be open for critique/comment.

Thanks for the correction on the book title, it indeed is "Anthropologist."
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
the link works for me....maybe i have been endowed with special forum powers :D

If a rating system can be introduced that would be great, if not, some form of editorial control should be easy enough to set up....i'm sure there'll be plenty of willing volunteers if necessary :)

andyandy - you do indeed have special powers which enable you to see things which aren't there for other mere Members!

For everyone else this I've included some attachments so you can see what it will look like. As you'll see I'm having some problems with the formatting (but only on IE! :wackyrealmad: ), the first attachment is the summary view and the second the full review.

My thoughts are to start with some "Highly recommended" books culled from the great suggestions in this thread and invite Members to provide the first reviews, that way we can sort out any teething problems such as ratings, final format and the like. Once all that is up and running it would be opened up for anyone to provide a book review.
 

Attachments

  • bookclub1.jpg
    bookclub1.jpg
    111.9 KB · Views: 18
  • bookclubfullreview.jpg
    bookclubfullreview.jpg
    66.3 KB · Views: 15
andyandy - you do indeed have special powers which enable you to see things which aren't there for other mere Members!

For everyone else this I've included some attachments so you can see what it will look like. As you'll see I'm having some problems with the formatting (but only on IE! :wackyrealmad: ), the first attachment is the summary view and the second the full review.

My thoughts are to start with some "Highly recommended" books culled from the great suggestions in this thread and invite Members to provide the first reviews, that way we can sort out any teething problems such as ratings, final format and the like. Once all that is up and running it would be opened up for anyone to provide a book review.

looks good...:D

Are you going to link to Amazon? Will that need separate links to the uk, us, nz, au etc. sites to cater for all members?

Will the book recommendation bit have a main landing page? Perhaps the top recommendations could be displayed on that....
 

Back
Top Bottom