Hardfire: Szamboti / Chandler / Mackey

Heiwa said:
Or Tony S rips the ideas of Mackey apart in two minutes and Mackey whines, whirs, whirls and whisks rest of the show?
Click to expand...

I think you'll find we're waiting for your (ahem) interpretation of the Ronan Point collapse, mate.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
When somebody is challenged to a duel he gets choice of weapons.
Click to expand...

So if Tony Szamboti is trying to challenge the validity of the generally accepted narrative of 9/11...

bill smith said:
In this case Tony should get the choice of format.
Click to expand...

...is rather the opposite of the expected conclusion.

But perhaps being invited to debate on a TV show isn't quite the same as being challenged to a duel.

Dave
 
tfk said:
And now a word from "Capt. Obvious"...
Try to make sure that they apportion speaking time "by side" (in which case you'd get 50%) and not "by person" (in which case you'd get 33%).

tom
Click to expand...

It seems obvious Captain that David Chandler will have to run his videos as most of his arguments are pretty dependent on the visuals therein.
What about starting the show with fullscreen of that video that shows the collapse of WTC1 in a continuous loop with commentary. They could run that and use it to show people what the argument is really about.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
It seems obvious Captain that David Chandler will have to run his videos as most of his arguments are pretty dependent on the visuals therein.
What about starting the show with fullscreen of that video that shows the collapse of WTC1 in a continuous loop with commentary. They could run that and use it to show people what the argument is really about.
Click to expand...

David Chandler already has an outlet for his silly little videos.
 
That's just sick

I would rather see the use of videos of the collapses (WTC1 & 2) curtailed as much as possible.

People are dying in those videos and the thought of 'a continuous loop with commentary' turns my stomach. The callousness of the egregious '9/11 truth movement' knows no bounds.
 
longfellow said:
I would rather see the use of videos of the collapses (WTC1 & 2) curtailed as much as possible.

People are dying in those videos and the thought of 'a continuous loop with commentary' turns my stomach. The callousness of the egregious '9/11 truth movement' knows no bounds.
Click to expand...

I think that the reality is that after a billion viewings and eight years, compassion fatigue has set in and is the order of the day as regards the falling buildings.
Images of people jumping is something else altogether but that is not a concern with the video I proposed.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
What about starting the show with fullscreen of that video that shows the collapse of WTC1 in a continuous loop with commentary. They could run that and use it to show people what the argument is really about.
Click to expand...

Collapse? You mean destruction, of course. Just carry on as usual, though. You're great!
 
longfellow said:
I would rather see the use of videos of the collapses (WTC1 & 2) curtailed as much as possible.

People are dying in those videos and the thought of 'a continuous loop with commentary' turns my stomach. The callousness of the egregious '9/11 truth movement' knows no bounds.
Click to expand...

Exactly. This gloating over the images of destruction just for the sake of misinterpreting them is one of the more revolting aspects of the T.R.U.T.H. movement.

Conspiracy porn.
 
Heiwa said:
Collapse? You mean destruction, of course. Just carry on as usual, though. You're great!
Click to expand...

Good work, Heiwa. It's important to make sure that the cult members use the correctly approved language, so that they won't start thinking for themselves. Shame on you, bill smith, for departing from the official dogma of your belief system; that sort of thing can lead to independent thinking, and we don't want that in a movement that's searching for truth, do we?

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
Good work, Heiwa. It's important to make sure that the cult members use the correctly approved language, so that they won't start thinking for themselves. Shame on you, bill smith, for departing from the official dogma of your belief system; that sort of thing can lead to independent thinking, and we don't want that in a movement that's searching for truth, do we?

Dave
Click to expand...

Speaking for myself Dave, I am not looking for the Truth of 9/11. I know that Truth. I am just trying to put the details together.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Good work, Heiwa. It's important to make sure that the cult members use the correctly approved language, so that they won't start thinking for themselves. Shame on you, bill smith, for departing from the official dogma of your belief system; that sort of thing can lead to independent thinking, and we don't want that in a movement that's searching for truth, do we?

Dave
Click to expand...

Hehe... remember Star Wars:
Obi Wan Kenobi said:
Who's the more foolish: The fool, or the fool who follows him?
Click to expand...

In this case, it's kind of a toss-up, I'd say. :D
 
bill smith said:
Speaking for myself Dave, I am not looking for the Truth of 9/11. I know that Truth. I am just trying to put the details together.
Click to expand...

if youre still putting the details together wouldnt that be the same thing as looking for the truth?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom