Virus
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2006
- Messages
- 6,875
those that were driven out of their houses started a war?
They left because the Arab states started a war.
those that were driven out of their houses started a war?
like letting in too many black people?Do you think that is or is not a legitimate concern?
Do you think it's possible for Switzerland or another country to allow so much immigration that their own culture is overwhelmed?
They left because the Arab states started a war.
So life isn't fair. The fact that you live in Switzerland and not the Gaza strip is ample evidence. Indeed, your own well-being is founded upon centuries of people exploiting life's essential unfairness for their own benefit at the expense of those less fortunate.
like letting in too many black people?
Let's put the question to you. Do you think it's a legitimate concern that a country might have too much immigration so that the immigrants might overwhelm the culture of the people already there?
You didn't answer the question DC. Is too much immigration a legitimate concern?
You didn't answer the question DC. Is too much immigration a legitimate concern?
He's given an answer and the answer is "no". I can respect that.
Complex issues are going to have divergent points of view, and it would be short-sighted to claim there is only once correct point of view to be had. I personally come from a very large country and it's difficult to imagine immigration heavy enough to overwhelm our culture and traditions, except perhaps regionally, but that's my country. Switzerland has a population of less than eight million, and especially if they give the vote to non-citizens, it's easy to imagine them having enough immigration to change the very nature of their country.
Personally, I'm eager to hear how The Fool answers the question.
Indeed, there was no logic at all in what you said.I'd respond to this if it made sense.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't fit in WildCat's world view. When you're not defending everything the glorious states of Israel and the US do, you're obvious a terrorist supporter.Maybe I'm not familiar with Peephole, but I read that as a condemnation of Palestinian terror?
Actually, yes, it does. It's part of war. See the, among other documents, the articles in the UN charter.oh and that excuses blockade of goods for the civilian population?
wow...a talking tree. Am I supposed to take threats from talking trees seriously?
Let's put the question to you. Do you think it's a legitimate concern that a country might have too much immigration so that the immigrants might overwhelm the culture of the people already there?
Its a common theme among bigots.Let's put the question to you. Do you think it's a legitimate concern that a country might have too much immigration so that the immigrants might overwhelm the culture of the people already there?
Its a common theme among bigots.
Actually, yes, it does. It's part of war. See the, among other documents, the articles in the UN charter.
War exists regardless of declaration in many cases, and since WW II, in an increasing number of cases.
DC, does a state of belligerency exist between Israel and Hamas? If yes, then various warlike acts can be expected by both parties. I think one does, but maybe one doesn't. It is a rather muddy situation.
Now, if you feel a state of belligerency does not exist between them, and you may have a good argument for that, please describe their political relationship to support that idea.
I am open to your thoughts.
I think it's funny you want to suggest I've lost the "courage in my convictions" while you give feeble non-committal answers like this.![]()
I can see that it can be a theme among bigots, but is it exclusive to bigots? Or can it be a legitimate concern?
C'mon, put yourself out there. The worst that might happen is you will change your mind later, and that's not so terrible, is it?
Darth Rotor brings up the Iroquois...would you call them bigots if at some time over the last 500 years they expressed a concern that there may have been too much European immigration to the Americas?
DC doesn't seem to mind, but what if another Swiss citizen felt that immigrants were changing his country in ways he didn't approve of? Would he be a bigot to think that maybe the solution is to have fewer immigrants?
Its a common theme among bigots. and it is the "they will overwhelm our culture" variation that bigots prefer. They rarely consider the cultural effects of the immigrants of thier own culture as a negative...Its generally a color they are not or a religion they are not....thats what gets to them.I can see that it can be a theme among bigots, but is it exclusive to bigots? Or can it be a legitimate concern?