HAARP, EISCAT & Recent Temperature Increases This Year

[KoihimeNakamura]

.
Gee, a random and demonstrably rather gullible post on an obscure internet forum with no discernible training or expertise on the matter, vs. Lord Oxburgh, Professor Huw Davies of ETH Zurich, Professor Kerry Emanual at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Professor Lisa Graumlich of the University of Arizona, Professor David Hand of Imperial College London, and Professors Herbert Huppert and Michael Kelly of the University of Cambridge, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group, the American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.


Who to believe, who to believe .....
.

QFE.

 

[INRM]

Elbe,

Yeah

Thank you

but you believe HAARP is heating up the earth...

No, I was speculating that that could be a cause. I honestly am not sure that HAARP or EISCAT are responsible, but it was a speculation.

 

[sts60]

Just the daily variation alone in the energy received by the Earth from the Sun is orders of magnitude larger than what HAARP can put out. HAARP has nothing to do with any large-scale environmental changes, or earthquakes, or shooting down spacecraft, or mind control, or any other such nonsense.

Just think next time before you post such stuff. It doesn't take specialized knowledge. You can Google the numbers yourself easily.

ETA: sorry for being snippy.

 

[elbe]

Thank you

I was being sarcastic. The climate scientists were exonerated by people who actually know what they're talking about. The only ones claiming serious wrongdoing were those with an agenda.

 

[Sceptic-PK]

Regardless, the evidence was overwhelming that these guys did exactly what those documents said they did. The exoneration was bogus in my opinion

Well I'm convinced!

 

[dafydd]

No they weren't.



No they haven't.



You think temperatures have dropped and they've gone up?



Firstly, no. Not only are they not being used for your paranoid nonsense, it's not physically possible for them to be used for it. Secondly, if some project was being used to heat the Earth up, it wouldn't be blamed on anthropogenic global warming, it would be anthropogenic by definition.



I think you should learn how to use a signature instead of typing this crap at the end of every post.

The crap at the end of the post is the liedmotief of the David Icke forum members.

 

[Ladewig]

INRM, has this post...

How much energy would it take to raise the temperature of the Earths atmosphere by one degree?

What is the power output of HAARP?


Somewhere in the answers to these two questions is the answer to yours.

...produced an answer to your satisfaction?

 

[Foolmewunz]

.
Gee, a random and demonstrably rather gullible post on an obscure internet forum with no discernible training or expertise on the matter, vs. Lord Oxburgh, Professor Huw Davies of ETH Zurich, Professor Kerry Emanual at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Professor Lisa Graumlich of the University of Arizona, Professor David Hand of Imperial College London, and Professors Herbert Huppert and Michael Kelly of the University of Cambridge, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group, the American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.


Who to believe, who to believe .....
.

QFE and nominated.