• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Grandson of WWII NAZI banker accuses others of appeasement.

TruthByDecree

Banned
T
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
138
"As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history," - President George W. Bush in Jerusalem to the Israeli parliament
Click to expand...

Does this guy even realize he’s only sitting in the White House because his Grandfather built the family fortune and political dynasty off the backs of NAZI slave labor? The same traitor who was involved in a plot to overthrow Roosevelt and the American government.

The only appeasement I see is Bush trying to appease Israel.
 
The PUSA invoking Godwin's law in Israel's Knesset, of all places.

Un-freakingly-believable.
 
Does anyone know who this senator was? The Internets don't go back that far and I'm I've been unable to google it up.
 
BigAl said:
Does anyone know who this senator was? The Internets don't go back that far and I'm I've been unable to google it up.
Click to expand...

New wiki entry on one William Edgar Borah

Borah returned to the forefront of public affairs via the 2008 presidential election when President George W. Bush quoted him during a speech in Israel commemorating that nation's 60th anniversary.
Click to expand...
 
What is perhaps most ironic about Bush's revolting remarks is that his administration has been negotiating with, and working with, terror-supporting regimes from day one.

Bush maintains close ties with the rulers of Saudi Arabia - creeps who send billions of dollars around the world to fund mosques and preach wahabbism. Oh and let's not forget where 15 of 19 Sept 11 hijackers came from.

This administration has also sent WOT detainees to Hezbollah's backers in Syria for "interrogation," has negotiated with Libya (the folks who used to blow up airplanes) over WMD programs and has held nuclear talks with North Korea.

Yet there are some Dems who risk repeating the appeasement of 1939 because they want to talk to the leaders of hostile states? :eek:
 
TruthByDecree said:
Does this guy even realize he’s only sitting in the White House because his Grandfather built the family fortune and political dynasty off the backs of NAZI slave labor? The same traitor who was involved in a plot to overthrow Roosevelt and the American government.
Click to expand...
As a general rule of thumb, I've noticed that any web site or internet handle with "truth" in the name generally is full of lies. Just for ***** and giggles, would you like to back that up?
 
CHF said:
What is perhaps most ironic about Bush's revolting remarks is that his administration has been negotiating with, and working with, terror-supporting regimes from day one.

Bush maintains close ties with the rulers of Saudi Arabia - creeps who send billions of dollars around the world to fund mosques and preach wahabbism. Oh and let's not forget where 15 of 19 Sept 11 hijackers came from.

This administration has also sent WOT detainees to Hezbollah's backers in Syria for "interrogation," has negotiated with Libya (the folks who used to blow up airplanes) over WMD programs and has held nuclear talks with North Korea.
Click to expand...
How can any of your examples above be characterized as appeasement?
 
CHF said:
What is perhaps most ironic about Bush's revolting remarks is that his administration has been negotiating with, and working with, terror-supporting regimes from day one.
Click to expand...

Not just negotiating, but flat-out "appeasing" them by way of open support, every step of the way.

Bush and his supporters are just bad people, so we can expect no less.
 
Are you for real? Prescott Bush worked in a bank that Fritz Thyssen owned. He had one stock, one share in that bank only one. He never said that he supported Hitler and he never said anything antisemitic. Harriman brothers had like 4000 shares in Thyssens bank. Anyway even Fritz Thyssen didn"t like Hitler in the end. Thyssen didn"t like what Hitler did to the jews so Thyssen stoped supporting Hitler. There is no proof that Bush and Thyssen were even friends. Just because somebody worked for Fritz Thyssen doesn"t proove that he supported Hitler. Whatabout Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr.? Oh yeah and Henry Ford liked Hitler if I remember rigth? And if Prescott Bush was a nazi then why did he support the United Negro College Fund? To me it doesn"t sound like a nazi would support something like that in the 1950"s so why did he support it?
 
Iraq war was wrong but it was in someway morally rigth. So Bush should have not overthrow Saddam Hussein and Chemical Ali? Who was better for Iraq Chemical Ali aka Joseph Mengele of today and madman Saddam "Stalin" Hussein or George Bush and USA. So was it wrong what Bill Clinton did to Slobodan Milošević? What is the diffrence between Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milošević?
 
WildCat said:
As a general rule of thumb, I've noticed that any web site or internet handle with "truth" in the name generally is full of lies. Just for ***** and giggles, would you like to back that up?
Click to expand...

How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

w w w .guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar


The Whitehouse Coup

w w w .bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document_20070723 shtm
 
TruthByDecree said:
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

w w w .guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar


The Whitehouse Coup

w w w .bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document_20070723 shtm
Click to expand...

Someone please tell me if this is one of those cases where Alex Jones uses an article, distorts it horribly and then a sheeple goes out into the world to paste links to articles which don't support the twoofers' position.
 
The Bush administration has been particularly adept at conflation. Conflating Saddam with Al Qaeda, the Iraqi insurgency with Al Qaeda, etc, etc.
Now we get the notion that negotiation=appeasement.

Fascinating. Invoke images of Hitler and Chamberlain to paint the opposition as naive fools who will give away the world to the enemy.
As if Bush's foreign policy has been a resounding success....
 
WildCat said:
What Saudi demands did Bush acquiesce to?
Click to expand...

What is there for them to demand? Bush allows them to pump millions of dollars into funding Wahabbism in America and holds their hand afterwards.

Perhaps the correct word for it isn't appeasement so much as it is collaboration.
 
CHF said:
Bush allows them to pump millions of dollars into funding Wahabbism in America and holds their hand afterwards.
Click to expand...

Is it really Bush who allows for that or the American legislation?
How do you think is it possible for them to spend so much money on mosques in the US or abroad in general? How could you make this illegal?
 
mrbaracuda said:
Is it really Bush who allows for that or the American legislation?
Click to expand...

Both. Bush seems to add hand-holding just to put the Saudis fully at ease.

How do you think is it possible for them to spend so much money on mosques in the US or abroad in general?
Click to expand...

Oil money.

How could you make this illegal?
Click to expand...

I'd say Wahabbism spends a fair amount of time calling for violence and terror. If that's not illegal then it probably should be.

Sometimes we in the West tend to be too tolerant for our own good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom