Government knew date, targets and method for 9/11 attacks

GregoryUrich

Graduate Poster
GregoryUrich
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
1,316
"Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza tells of meeting with whistleblowers who said the government knew the date, targets and methods of the attacks prior to 9/11. She also relates that the names of the whistleblowers were passed to Chairman Kean who promised to hear them, but never did. See the video (at the point 17min-22min): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rukxI_GLc3w
 
Well then these people should com forward with their evidence.
 
Perhaps this information will be made available next decade. After all, what's the hurry? :rolleyes:

I say we take up a collection to buy these "whistleblowers" a new supply of cork balls.
 
Last edited:
GregoryUrich said:
"Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza tells of meeting with whistleblowers who said the government knew the date, targets and methods of the attacks prior to 9/11. She also relates that the names of the whistleblowers were passed to Chairman Kean who promised to hear them, but never did. See the video (at the point 17min-22min): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rukxI_GLc3w
Click to expand...

Having shed the shackles of all that fact based stuff, you know, engineering, math, equations, you are really blossoming in this 9/11 CT stuff.

It's much easier without the burden of objective facts isn't it?
 
GregoryUrich said:
"Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza tells of meeting with whistleblowers who said the government knew the date, targets and methods of the attacks prior to 9/11. She also relates that the names of the whistleblowers were passed to Chairman Kean who promised to hear them, but never did. See the video (at the point 17min-22min): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rukxI_GLc3w
Click to expand...
Greg, please take this to the news papers and get your Pulitzer Prize.

You have dropped engineering and gone total "truth". Was it the 29,000,000 pounds?

Pathetic
 
Last edited:
I guess we can assume that GregoryUrich is no longer "Neutral" on 9/11 Conspiracy theories like he claimed for so long.
 
DavidJames said:
Having shed the shackles of all that fact based stuff, you know, engineering, math, equations, you are really blossoming in this 9/11 CT stuff.

It's much easier without the burden of objective facts isn't it?
Click to expand...

Testimony from witnesses doesn't count? Don't worry, I'm still working on the engineering stuff but there are other facts too you know.
 
Can you really call them whistleblowers when they ain't exactly blowing any figurative whistles?
 
I know of a guy who talked to a 9/11 whistleblower in the mens room of a DQ. The whistleblower was wearing a trenchcoat and dark sunglasses.
 
GregoryUrich said:
"Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza tells of meeting with whistleblowers who said the government knew the date, targets and methods of the attacks prior to 9/11. She also relates that the names of the whistleblowers were passed to Chairman Kean who promised to hear them, but never did. See the video (at the point 17min-22min): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rukxI_GLc3w
Click to expand...

So, where are these whistleblowers with their evidence? Why have they not come forward? Why would they only talk to the 9/11 commission? Do they have no other evenues to get their stories out?
 
dudalb said:
I guess we can assume that GregoryUrich is no longer "Neutral" on 9/11 Conspiracy theories like he claimed for so long.
Click to expand...

I would wait to see the outcome of a "real investigation" before claiming that this is fact. If you have followed my "neutrality" you should know that I have always been in favor of a new investigation, one with teeth. I think this is just one of the indications that a new investigation is needed. As far as the WTC collapses go, I am still 50/50.
 
Gravy said:
Perhaps this information will be made available next decade. After all, what's the hurry? :rolleyes:

I say we take up a collection to buy these "whistleblowers" a new supply of cork balls.
Click to expand...
i say we take up a collection to buy them real names, "whistleblower" doesnt really look good on an affidavit
 
GregoryUrich said:
...which were never investigated. I don't think this proves conspiracy. I think it demonstrates the need for a new independent investigation.
Click to expand...

So they should go public with their evidence and get the people to demand a new investigation.
 
I find it disturbing that these "whistleblowers" keep protecting the murderers by not disclosing what they know (especially names). They fear for their lives, you say? Well, then, I find it disturbing that these "whistleblowers" are placing their own interests ahead of those of humanity.
 
GregoryUrich said:
...which were never investigated. I don't think this proves conspiracy. I think it demonstrates the need for a new independent investigation.
Click to expand...

Pssst. In trutherese, 'Need for a new independent investigation' is translated as 'I think it was an inside job'. Where have you been? It usually follows the inability to prove an inside job. It can be a cop out, a way to save face.

"Well, I know I don't have evidence, but if we had a new independent investigation the truth will come out". We've seen it a thousand times, and you know it sir.

IMO, The truth is there isn't even enough evidence to warrant a need for ANOTHER independent investigation, much less that there was an inside job.
You've read the threads on the subject in this forum; the next questions asked of you will be how this unbiased 'new independent investigation' will proceed and who will comprise it.
 
Last edited:
dudalb said:
I guess we can assume that GregoryUrich is no longer "Neutral" on 9/11 Conspiracy theories like he claimed for so long.
Click to expand...



I was wrong about Urich. I claimed that he would reveal himself as a full-blown twoofer after his 500th post. It has taken him 800 posts, although he really didn't hide his intentions very well.
 
GregoryUrich said:
...which were never investigated. I don't think this proves conspiracy. I think it demonstrates the need for a new independent investigation.
Click to expand...
6 years and you missed all the independent investigations yesterday.

But you have a great avatar for being the bearer of great truth!
pwa.gif

Are you are too research challenged to see the facts are in? Have you new stuff to present? This is OLD!!

So, have you given up on the engineering deal?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom