Google censorship

Tippit said:
It's not a product of leftist ideology, it's a product of totalitarian globalist ideology. The leftist, banker dominated corporations are just Hegelian synthesis towards this agenda.



You have a sadly puerilistic understanding of how the world works. Capitalism hasn't existed since 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was signed. Endless free fiat money to subsidize banks, bank losses, corporations, stock buybacks, corporate consolidation, and monopolistic tech giants has zero at all to do with capitalism. Even worse, you just admitted to the self-flagellating idea that censorship is good. Google designed the censored and isolated Chinese internet, whereby the Chinese people actually live in the totalitarian echo chamber that you are so ignorantly clamoring for. I know, however, that you rationalize all of this because you're probably been brainwashed your entire life, and because you secretly believe that these same banks and corporations are on your side.

It will be a rude awakening for you.



"Right wingers" have as little understanding of the corrupt money system as you do, they just profit by it because, well, they own assets and you probably don't. Unlike you, however, they aren't willing to burn down the Bill of Rights and Constitution and throw the baby out with the bathwater, because, well, they're not that stupid. On the other hand, they aren't as desperate as you, because they can eat, and because they generally don't believe the globalist propaganda that everyone is racist, and well, that you're poor because everyone is racist.

In that sense, I can understand why you're willing to burn everything down, because you have nothing, and you have no understanding of why you have nothing. It doesn't make the situation any less tragic though, does it?
Click to expand...

ahh yes. Globalist bankers. Or (((Globalist Bankers)))

Of course what we have now isn't Real CapitalismTM because real capitalists are notably content with what they have and aren't voraciously looking for opportunities to expand their power. Global-scale, stateless mega corporations aren't the logical end result of unrestrained capital, but rather the product of shifty (((bankers))) derailing things.

/s in case that isn't clear.
 
Last edited:
SuburbanTurkey said:
ahh yes. Globalist bankers. Or (((Globalist Bankers)))



Of course what we have now isn't Real CapitalismTM because real capitalists are notably content with what they have and aren't voraciously looking for opportunities to expand their power. Global-scale, stateless mega corporations aren't the logical end result of unrestrained capital, but rather the product of shifty (((bankers))) derailing things.
Click to expand...
So we'd be living a utopia if it wasn't for teh joos?
 
SuburbanTurkey said:
ahh yes. Globalist bankers. Or (((Globalist Bankers)))

Of course what we have now isn't Real CapitalismTM because real capitalists are notably content with what they have and aren't voraciously looking for opportunities to expand their power. Global-scale, stateless mega corporations aren't the logical end result of unrestrained capital, but rather the product of shifty (((bankers))) derailing things.

/s in case that isn't clear.
Click to expand...

In Real Capitalism™, everything would be perfect because the capitalists, unlike the (((capitalists))), would stop gorging themselves and invest in the well-being of society out of Rational Self Interest®. But that's not socialism!!!
 
Foster Zygote said:
In Real Capitalism™, everything would be perfect because the capitalists, unlike the (((capitalists))), would stop gorging themselves and invest in the well-being of society out of Rational Self Interest®. But that's not socialism!!!
Click to expand...

Wow, you've managed to ridicule Ayn Rand, anti-semitism, libertarianism, Karl Marx, and trickle-down economics in one sentence. That's nothing short of a tour-de-force considering how few words you used. And in your second sentence you throw in right-wingers in general for good measure. Nicely done!
 
Belz... said:
Wow, you've managed to ridicule Ayn Rand, anti-semitism, libertarianism, Karl Marx, and trickle-down economics in one sentence. That's nothing short of a tour-de-force considering how few words you used. And in your second sentence you throw in right-wingers in general for good measure. Nicely done!
Click to expand...
Which is a little unfair to Marx, he did some good research work.
 
Belz... said:
Wow, you've managed to ridicule Ayn Rand, anti-semitism, libertarianism, Karl Marx, and trickle-down economics in one sentence. That's nothing short of a tour-de-force considering how few words you used. And in your second sentence you throw in right-wingers in general for good measure. Nicely done!
Click to expand...

All shall love me and despair!
 
In 2012 I watched Google bury a controversial item.


It was about Charlie Sheen. The night before, on Entertainment Tonight, he said: "911 was an inside job".

Next day, it was the top result for "Charlie Sheen" on all the other search engines. It never got near page one at google search results.

Google's top result for "Charlie Sheen" remained "troubled actor" or some such smoke screen
 
Last edited:
Cosmic Yak said:
Do you believe that capitalism ceased to exist in 1913?

Do you knowingly profit from the 'corrupt money system'?
Click to expand...



I'd like to hear more about why Tippit said that.


Edited by xjx388: 
Rule 0; Rule 12


Maybe he is also right about the 1913 thing. Could that be related to why Wilson lamented that he screwed America.?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tippit said:
It's nice to have a $1.6 trillion dollar company that opposes free speech at your back, helping you to figure out exactly what the "facts" are, isn't it! Most of us can't be bothered to do things like read, think critically, and hit the PGDN button. It's understandable.

You will love your Chinese Communist Overlords though, I promise.
Click to expand...

You do realize that a private company deciding what to prompt and what to not prompt is at the very heart of what capitalism is, don't you? It's Google's product, they get to decide what's on it. It's funny how the Right-Wingers scream about Capitalism and The Constitution and whinge about Communism, and yet seem to know absolutely nothing about any of them.
 
Bubba said:
I'd like to hear more about why Tippit said that.


One reason is that I like how his signature quote accurately describes fake skeptics like you.

Maybe he is also right about the 1913 thing. Could that be related to why Wilson lamented that he screwed America.?
Click to expand...

In other words, you don't know anything about capitalsim ending in 1913, and you don't know if Tippit was right, but you described their comments as 'pearls before swine'.
If you don't know about it, and you don't know if it's right, how do you know it's a pearl?
Oh, and you avoided yet another question: Do you knowingly profit from the corrupt money system, like Tippit said you did?
Edited by xjx388: 
<SNIP>Rule 0; Rule 12
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom