Google censorship

[Tippit]

I'm really tickled by the idea that massive, near monopoly mega corporations wielding undue influence in the public sphere is the product of leftist political ideology run amok.

It's not a product of leftist ideology, it's a product of totalitarian globalist ideology. The leftist, banker dominated corporations are just Hegelian synthesis towards this agenda.

The right wing freaks that have been begging for loosening all constraints on the capitalist classes have got what they wanted, and hard. I hope they enjoy the capitalist hell world they've always been begging for where Google might snap their fingers and decide your viewpoint is verboten and there's nothing you can do about it.

You have a sadly puerilistic understanding of how the world works. Capitalism hasn't existed since 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was signed. Endless free fiat money to subsidize banks, bank losses, corporations, stock buybacks, corporate consolidation, and monopolistic tech giants has zero at all to do with capitalism. Even worse, you just admitted to the self-flagellating idea that censorship is good. Google designed the censored and isolated Chinese internet, whereby the Chinese people actually live in the totalitarian echo chamber that you are so ignorantly clamoring for. I know, however, that you rationalize all of this because you're probably been brainwashed your entire life, and because you secretly believe that these same banks and corporations are on your side.

It will be a rude awakening for you.

Fingers crossed that right wingers somehow find themselves ass-backwards taking up an anti-trust and anti-monopoly stance towards big business by way of "owning the libs". Truly the world's brightest minds at work.

"Right wingers" have as little understanding of the corrupt money system as you do, they just profit by it because, well, they own assets and you probably don't. Unlike you, however, they aren't willing to burn down the Bill of Rights and Constitution and throw the baby out with the bathwater, because, well, they're not that stupid. On the other hand, they aren't as desperate as you, because they can eat, and because they generally don't believe the globalist propaganda that everyone is racist, and well, that you're poor because everyone is racist.

In that sense, I can understand why you're willing to burn everything down, because you have nothing, and you have no understanding of why you have nothing. It doesn't make the situation any less tragic though, does it?

 

[Belz...]

Some strong mental gymnastics in this thread. They've brainwashed you harder than I thought.

You can't just dismiss people who don't agree with you like this. You can't just declare something to be true, or link to questionable sources and dead-end argument, and expect to be believed -- not on a forum that tries to pride itself on at least a semblance of skepticism. If you want blind acceptance of your claims, go to 4chan.

You don't get any better evidence than this from whistleblowers

Whistleblowers are anecdotal evidence. You have to be able to confirm their claims.

"But I haven't heard it on TV, it can't be true!"

Nobody said that. I don't even have TV. Don't lie.

 

[Belz...]

So, you're in favor of BLM destroying suburbs, then.

Is there no topic on which you are not wrong? Are you doing that deliberately?

Welcome to the forum! I call them "pseudo-skeptics". Because, well, they're not really skeptics. Confirmation bias is a bitch

Oh, my, the irony!

 

[Cosmic Yak]

Some strong mental gymnastics in this thread. They've brainwashed you harder than I thought. You don't get any better evidence than this from whistleblowers, where you have them admit to it on camera and have leaked documents.

As has been noted, 'whistleblowers' claims alone do not constitute evidence. The web is littered with lurid claims from 'anonymous whistleblowers', the vast majority of which turn out to be complete rubbish, and may often originate from Russian or Chinese disinformation programmes.
As a further point, how are these plucky rebels getting their messages on camera, or publicising these leaked documents, if everything's censored?
I also love these claims of 'brainwashing'. I suggest you read a bit further about this process, because it's nowhere near as easy as you are claiming here. It's also striking how easy it is for people like you to completely negate this brainwashing: apparently just logging on to Infowars or Bitchute is enough, and then you have escaped all these insidious attempts at control, leaving you free to sneer at all the other, stupid people.
Has it occurred to you that people can disagree with you as a result of their own thinking? Has it also occurred to you that dismissing contrary opinions is profoundly elitist and anti-democratic?

It's even easily confirmable too, just by making simple google searches and seeing how the results are strongly skewed compared to Bing, Duckduckgo and Yandex.

*sigh*
No matter how many times algorithms are explained here, the message somehow never gets through.

"But I haven't heard it on TV, it can't be true!"

Do, please, quote anyone here as having said that or anything even close to that.
Actually, I'll just say it, because I know you can't: this is yet another elitist strawman.

They even admit to it themselves with their vague declensions for what censor out. https://support.google.com/webmaste...er&zippy=,news-and-discover-policy-violations

Censoring? Really?
Which of these would you like to see allowed unrestricted?

• content that could directly facilitate serious and immediate harm to people or animals.
• harassment, bullying, or threatening content, including but not limited to, that which might single someone out for malicious abuse, threaten someone with serious harm, sexualize someone in an unwanted way, expose private information of someone else that could be used to carry out threats, disparage, or belittle victims of violence or tragedy, deny an atrocity, or harass in other ways.
• content that has been manipulated to deceive, defraud, or mislead by means of creating a representation of actions or events that verifiably did not take place.
• content from any site that contradicts or runs contrary to scientific or medical consensus and evidence-based best practices.
• content that promotes or condones violence, or has the primary purpose of inciting hatred against an individual or group, including but not limited to, on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or any other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization.

All of these are from your link. Which of these do you think is a mark of totalitarian brainwashing?
I should also point out that Yahoo, Bing etc., have the same kinds of policies:
https://about.ads.microsoft.com/en-gb/resources/policies/restricted-and-disallowed-content-policies
https://www.verizonmedia.com/policies/us/en/verizonmedia/guidelines/index.html

 

[Cosmic Yak]

The leftist, banker dominated corporations are just Hegelian synthesis towards this agenda.

For example?

You have a sadly puerilistic understanding of how the world works. Capitalism hasn't existed since 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was signed.

One piece of legislation, in one country, abolished capitalism around the world? And you accuse others of having a puerile (I'm not sure 'puerilistic' is actually a word, BTW) world view? Goodness me.

Even worse, you just admitted to the self-flagellating idea that censorship is good. Google designed the censored and isolated Chinese internet, whereby the Chinese people actually live in the totalitarian echo chamber that you are so ignorantly clamoring for. I know, however, that you rationalize all of this because you're probably been brainwashed your entire life, and because you secretly believe that these same banks and corporations are on your side.

Citations needed.

 

[catsmate]

Some strong mental gymnastics in this thread.

Yes. You are really determined to believe the bollocks spewed by PV to support your prejudices, despite the organisation's history of being absolutely wrong.

They've brainwashed you harder than I thought.

Ah, the classic wooster (though not Wooster ) response to being confronted by people who don't immediately accept their nonsense.

You don't get any better evidence than this from whistleblowers,

where you have them admit to it on camera and have leaked documents.

Except, of course, where the videos were selectively edited, or outright faked, as usual with PV.

It's even easily confirmable too, just by making simple google searches and seeing how the results are strongly skewed compared to Bing, Duckduckgo and Yandex.

"But I haven't heard it on TV, it can't be true!"

I see you;re in full strawman phase now.

Have fun with your spyware,

I'm out.

Goodbye. Don't like the nanobots bite.

They even admit to it themselves with their vague declensions for what censor out. https://support.google.com/webmaste...er&zippy=,news-and-discover-policy-violations

Ah, I see PV isn't the only one who selectively interprets documents to support their bias.

 

[catsmate]

So, you're in favor of BLM destroying suburbs, then.

Has anyone seen a set of goalposts...........

I call them "pseudo-skeptics".

A popuolar term among woosters, for those who refuse to accept their unevidenced bollocks.

Because, well, they're not really skeptics.

Pot-kettle.

Confirmation bias is a bitch, when your ego requires you to believe pre-existing narratives.

Ah, the irony.

On the other hand, some of them make better arguments than others. At worst, you can learn which of their arguments are dishonest or illogical, and how better to make an honest, effective argument yourself for people who are actually prepared to learn.

Perhaps you can learn the difference between socialism and communism soon? But I doubt it.

 

[smartcooky]

Perhaps you can learn the difference between socialism and communism soon? But I doubt it.

It will never happen because "Confirmation bias is a bitch, when your ego requires you to believe pre-existing narratives."

 

[smartcooky]

It's even easily confirmable too, just by making simple google searches and seeing how the results are strongly skewed compared to Bing, Duckduckgo and Yandex.

Really?

The only substantial difference I find between DuckDuckGo and Google is when I am logged into Google. When I run Google while logged out, with my VPN enabled (in or out of Incognito mode) I find the Google and DuckDuckGo search results are near identical, page for page.

 

[Darat]

Really?

The only substantial difference I find between DuckDuckGo and Google is when I am logged into Google. When I run Google while logged out, with my VPN enabled (in or out of Incognito mode) I find the Google and DuckDuckGo search results are near identical, page for page.

One suspects that the conspiracy theorists depth of knowledge is rather shallow.

 

[Belz...]

You don't get any better evidence than this from whistleblowers

Coming back to this, remember Q? He claimed to be an insider with high-level clearance. Turns out he was just an admin trying to stir the pot for his own amusement or benefit. Many of us had called that, too.

Maybe confirm the whistleblower's claim with evidence, then?

 

[Halcyon Dayz]

So, you're in favor of BLM destroying suburbs, then.

Well, somebody's got to do it.
North American suburbia is a soul-sucking scourge.

 

[Bubba]

You're just not paying attention if you dont know by now that google is crooked for the left.

 

[Resume]

You're just not paying attention if you dont know by now that google is crooked for the left.

What does that even mean?

CANE.

 

[Bubba]

It's not a product of leftist ideology, it's a product of totalitarian globalist ideology. The leftist, banker dominated corporations are just Hegelian synthesis towards this agenda.



You have a sadly puerilistic understanding of how the world works. Capitalism hasn't existed since 1913, when the Federal Reserve Act was signed. Endless free fiat money to subsidize banks, bank losses, corporations, stock buybacks, corporate consolidation, and monopolistic tech giants has zero at all to do with capitalism. Even worse, you just admitted to the self-flagellating idea that censorship is good. Google designed the censored and isolated Chinese internet, whereby the Chinese people actually live in the totalitarian echo chamber that you are so ignorantly clamoring for. I know, however, that you rationalize all of this because you're probably been brainwashed your entire life, and because you secretly believe that these same banks and corporations are on your side.

It will be a rude awakening for you.



"Right wingers" have as little understanding of the corrupt money system as you do, they just profit by it because, well, they own assets and you probably don't. Unlike you, however, they aren't willing to burn down the Bill of Rights and Constitution and throw the baby out with the bathwater, because, well, they're not that stupid. On the other hand, they aren't as desperate as you, because they can eat, and because they generally don't believe the globalist propaganda that everyone is racist, and well, that you're poor because everyone is racist.

In that sense, I can understand why you're willing to burn everything down, because you have nothing, and you have no understanding of why you have nothing. It doesn't make the situation any less tragic though, does it?

Pearls before swine.

 

[Axxman300]

It's nice to have a $1.6 trillion dollar company that opposes free speech at your back, helping you to figure out exactly what the "facts" are, isn't it! Most of us can't be bothered to do things like read, think critically, and hit the PGDN button. It's understandable.

You will love your Chinese Communist Overlords though, I promise.

And yet all of that CT crap is still there on Google. Just not on the first two pages.

 

[Resume]

Pearls before swine.

Turd conspiracy for credules.

 

[Belz...]

You're just not paying attention if you dont know by now that google is crooked for the left.

They're a big corporation that are in business to make money. That's their ideology.

 

[sackett]

"Crooked for the left." You know, there's something in that, if you define "left" as any stance that differs even a hair from woo-hoo falangist mysticism. If you don't gobble up the fascist word salad and believe! believe! believe! in the magic of Myanmar Flynn,* you're a Hegel-loving crinnimal commie and a Black Leftie Marauder!

You'll never be a multimillionaire neither.


* I mention him casually because he's in the news today. Plenty of others.

 

[Armitage72]

Perhaps you can learn the difference between socialism and communism soon? But I doubt it.

Everyone knows that socialism is basically the policies of Hitler. It's the midpoint between communism and something else that I can't remember.