I didn't make it up, there's plenty of articles discussing it. Plenty of articles saying its not, and plenty of articles saying is growing but getting thinner-
Peer reviewed literature written by Godot, I assume (because you talk and talk and talk, but they never are linked here).
Of course, you can link here to "articles" written by other
loggers, whether they are blog posts or "columns" in NRA-like denial-advocacy sites, but, you know, self referencing is not proof of anything: you are simply saying "people is talking about 'Antarctica is growing' " -whatever that means, even the closing of the Drake and a paved route from Ushuahia to the South Pole.
I didn't reply to your question because you'd rather insult, I'm fine with that too but your buddies on here would rather give me yellow cards instead of you.
As to your question, 37 years is nothing, bit of a joke that you'd bring it up.
I don't doubt you feel insulted; as insulted as the kiddo that has been just told that Santa doesn't exist.
The matter remains your epistemological hedonism is your problem, and only yours. On the specific subject of "the Antarctic is growing (SIC)", you conveniently kept yourself hidden in the dark when we discussed it here, weeks, months and a few years ago. As for the most recent, you willingly ignored it when I told how the Australian official site had been hacked/had a glitch and informed a growing of one million square kilometres in Antarctic sea ice in 24 hours, what conveniently got it into a "record high" that was instantly exploited by a constellation of denialist blogs and facebook pages. The next day, when the data were corrected and it bounced back to be a "nearly record low", those sites ignored it. That's how epistemological hedonism works. Of course,
your epistemological hedonism makes the memory persist and that's how you're here now, debating it with the big boys, on an
equal footing 
(isn't epistemological hedonism wonderful? it allows you to both believe AGW doesn't exist and you are capable to converse about it, all for the same price).
And about the same bit you willingly ignored, that's why you can't reply about the last 37 year record: you can't match the story you decided to adopt with the record, so you either ignore it or move to the next step: all records are concocted (that is, the path of epistemological hedonism on steroids, but, why won't you raise your bet? if it wasn't work before, it won't work in the future, but you can always
believe it works).
Actually I'm quite skeptical of both sides. You on the other hand seem to be completely "bought in" on the hoax.
Your
modus operandi is applying your wishful thinking to anything, so I'm not particularly concerned that you apply it to me, so both Santa Claus exists and I "bought it on the hoax", reindeers and all, whatever you need to believe to keep the play running.
If you are unable to understand such simple things and grow, maybe you can perceive you're making a fool of yourself.
