The problem with claims like that, based on past experience, is that if that changes, say now there are more cold records, more records for low maximum temps, more record lows, somebody will quietly switch the claim, and say something different about what the records mean. In short, it won't matter. There is no metric, no possible scenario, no scientific set of predictions that can be said to have been met or not met, to know if the theory of global warming is true or not.
Like the Antarctic ice, or temperatures, or snowfall. It doesn't matter what happens, what the long term trend there is, it can't mean no warming. And when you point this out, that we are seeing something that isn't scientific at all, the very people who claim they are the science, the side of right, they hurl insults, they are insulting and rude and to top it off, they blame "other people" for making them act that way. Scientists don't talk like that.
Nobody knows, that is the actuality. Nobody knows because it hasn't happened before. In a normal world, where this was purely a scientific event, we would all agree nobody knows. And we would all be quite interested in what is going to be the effect of a quiet sun. (and we would honestly discuss how very wrong the predictions were about this current sunspot cycle)
But instead we get claims that are just not scientific at all. You don't know what is going to happen. Period. No if ands or buts, you don't know. That is the honest truth.
Yes, going by historic records and current theory, we should see changes in climate from the changes in the sun. This ridiculous mania over "catastrophic global warming is happening now" wants to deny that this is even a possibility.
