Global Geographic Literacy Survey

Ok, Is there anybody on this thread who can help us determine whether "Ich Sprechren nicht sehr gut Deutch". Means "I believe I will vomit on that leper" as BPSCG thinks or "I don't speak German very well" which was what I think it means. Considering that the only word the two translations have in common is "I" I think it's safe to assume that at least one of us is horribly wrong.
I think BP is messin' with you, but for the record, word-for-word, what you said is, "I speak not very good German." It's how I would have said it, what little German I have retained, except I would have said, "Ich spreche..."


eta typo fix
 
Perhaps if you did travel to Europe, it might not be anywhere near as bad as you fear? Travelling to other countries is a very learning experience.

True, it might not be anywhere near as bad as I fear. It might also be just as bad or even worse than I fear, too. I am not sure that I am willing to pay ten grand to find out. This really is my point.

Personally, There are literally dozens of places I'd like to go over there. But I think I'd prefer to wait a while, in hopes that things change a bit, before I am willing to take a trip like that. It's not like I'll be bored, there are dozens of places I'd like to go over here too, and it's not like Europe won't still be there in a few years.


Well, what about the outpouring of sympathy for Americans after 9-11? Does that count at all?

We need to see hard numbers on this, not rely on horror-stories.

If you have any hard numbers feel free to post them. All I can find are ones detailing political and cultural differences.
 
I think BP is messin' with you, but for the record, word-for-word, what you said is, "I speak not very good German." It's how I would have said it, what little German I have retained, except I would have said, "Ich spreche..."
Hmmm. I may have been misinformed.
 
And it is not the Anti-Bush protests that put me off. I'm not over fond of the bastage either. It's the sheer number of people (mostly places other than here, but here to an extent too) I see talking about how stupid/ugly/insert-negative-trait-here Americans are. Not Bush, Americans. It's the horror stories I hear about how Americans get treated over there.

Then come to Canada. We like everyone, here.
 
Based on this, however, you would think that Americans would know more about Canada than any other country. We share the world's longest undefended border, we are the US's largest trading partner, we even supply more oil to the US than any other country. Yet Americans tend not to know too much about the geography or politics of Canada.

I'm sure a lot of them couldn't even place us on a map.
 
I din't say they were. I did say that they are treated worse than, for example, Canadians.

Prove it. Hard data.

Aren't you advocating the separation of "Bush" from "Americans"? And WRT Spain, again, that is a specific country, not Europe as a whole.

Look at this thread, then.

You can do what you like. But you should also understand that by criticising Bush, you make Europe less welcoming for a significant segment of the US population.

Do you think we should stop criticizing Bush, so Americans can feel more welcome?

From here: http://tinet.ita.doc.gov/view/f-2000-04-001/index.html
Europe to US, 1999: 11,242,690

From here: http://tinet.ita.doc.gov/view/f-1999-11-001/index.html
US to Europe, 1999: 11,577,000

So, about the same in terms of overall numbers of visitors.

This is not "the whole world". This is for Europe only. The numbers for US-to-abroad are only estimates.

But, there's something amiss here. Take a look at the grand total of arrivals to the US:

2000: 50,890,701
2002: 41,891,707

Same source, but look at the huge drop. In just two years, it drops 18% in two years, while the numbers from 2002 to 2003 drop 4%.

I want to see the specified data from 2001.

You leave out one possibility: I don't care about the history of Danish tourism 30 to 40 years ago. It doesn't help me at all about today, or answer my question.

And that's why your argument is so weak: You deliberately choose to ignore information that, for a large part, answers your question.

The raw numbers for 1999 are above.

Addressed.

According to here: http://www.popco.org/press/articles/2004-1-myers.html

The population of the US: about 293 million.
The population of Europe: about 726 million.

So it seems, then, that proportionally more Americans visit Europe than Europeans visit the US.

Huh. Whodathunkit?

Europe: 709,022,061 million, 2002.

You forgot this one:

Thanz said:
Europeans obviously go to other European nations more often than the US.

Any data on that?

Good point. You're right, I was using "distance" as a sort of proxy for "relevance".

Based on this, however, you would think that Americans would know more about Canada than any other country. We share the world's longest undefended border, we are the US's largest trading partner, we even supply more oil to the US than any other country. Yet Americans tend not to know too much about the geography or politics of Canada.

So, do they?

Nevertheless, since the US' oil in large part comes from the Middle East, I find it very disturbing that Americans know so little about the region.

No.

Talk is cheap. And actions speak louder than words.

In which case, you also think that Europeans talking bad about Americans is irrelevant?

There is a whole lot you can tell someone about the history of the conflict and the region as a whole without having them be able to pick it out on a map. For instance, you can say that it is surrounded by Muslim nations. You can say that Jerusalem is considered to be the most important city for all three major mono-theistic religions. (aside: is this true for Islam? Is Jerusalem more "important" than Mecca?). I can understand that fact without being able to point to Jerusalem on a map.

Is it hard to pick out Israel on a map? No. Is it essential to even begin understanding the conflict? Also no.

But you have already listed a lot of geographical knowledge.

If you have any hard numbers feel free to post them. All I can find are ones detailing political and cultural differences.

I don't. That's why I asked if you had them.
 
Jas said:
Please show me where I said it was. I was simply pointing out that the of the two countries that border the US, only one does not have English as an official language.

You still haven’t answered the question.

CFLarsen said:
Yeah, it's there, although not "everywhere", as the quote claims.
I never said it was everywhere. That was just one example of how Americans see things in Europe.

You see, there are some people in Denmark who thinks Bush is a disaster - and some express that.
And you don’t think that Americans visiting a foreign country, seeing anti-Bush graffiti, might not be comfortable with that?

What is interesting, though, is not what you choose to quote, but what you choose not to quote:
I quoted what was pertinent to my point, which is that there is anti-American and anti-Bush sentiment is Europe. The two are often lumped together. Are you saying that Bush has nothing to do with the US? News to me.

So, there is concern about Bush - not Americans - and (I hope you agree with me) it is valid.
It doesn’t matter if it’s valid or not, like I said earlier. The fact is, there is anti-American and anti-Bush sentiment. Whatever the reason for it, it’s going to make Americans feel unwelcome.

Proof that Danes don't hate Americans (which you left out):
Strawman.

I never said Danes hate Americans.

If you travel by car, sure. But there are other means of travel. Flying comes to mind.

It would take me 8 hours just to fly to the other end of the country (just the flight time, not including the 3 hour layover in Toronto, or the check in time, or that the airport is an hour away). Not to mention, we don’t have all the budget airlines that Europeans do. You could fly to Berlin today, for under $100 US, according to EasyJet. For me to fly to the States, which is the country next door, would cost me close to $450, on the budget airline, including taxes.

I also have to check in at least 2 hours early if I’m leaving the country.

Not to mention, trains aren’t the practical option that they are in Europe, as we don’t have the population density to justify using them as a primary form of transportation (there are some regions, particularly in the east, however, that do have trains which are used regularly.)

As stated earlier, from downtown London, I could be in downtown Paris in three hours.

Not really. You have plenty of airports in the United States.
I’m Canadian. Hence why I said ‘province’ not ‘state’ when referring to myself, and my experiences. Maybe you should try reading my posts.

Funny, I just showed that your own evidence disproves your contention.
My contention was that there was anti-American sentiment. How did you disprove that?

Note that it is a picture of Bush. It is not an American flag. We are very aware of the difference, you know.

Or maybe I misunderstand you: Do you think that Bush is synonymous with America?

You’re splitting hairs. Is Bush not American? Was he not voted in by Americans? Is he not the leader of the United States? Most people who aren’t Americans don’t bother to make the distinction. The leader of a country is often seen as a symbol of that country.

As there are instances of anti-Europeanism in the US. As exhibited in this very thread. And, of course, the Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast, a government sanctioned form of anti-Europeanism, to hit back at France.

France and Europe aren’t the same thing. France is only part of Europe. How many anti-European protests do you see in the States, compared to the anti-Bush and anti-American protests you see in Europe?

Anti-French isn’t Anti-Europe. As an example, my father cancelled a trip to France because of the gov’ts position, and won’t go there until it changes. He’ll still go to other European countries though. Why? Because they don’t necessarily have anything to do with each other.

Please, let's not generalize about "Europe", hm? Cities in Denmark also make you clean up after your dog.

Did you not just do that, in the above quote?
 
Ok, took the quiz. How could anyone get under 20? Maybe 19, given the "most popular religion" question.
 
Then come to Canada. We like everyone, here.
Went to Canada on a ski trip in February, 1999. Got hit with an ugly head cold two days before; if you've ever been in a plane with a bad cold, you know the misery I was in.

After we were airborne, the well-dressed gentleman in the window seat next to me asked where I was headed. I told him the eastern townships area of Quebec, Mont Sutton in particular.

He kinda glared at me for reasons I still can't fathom.

"You know it's a different country, don't you?" he growled at me.

"Uh, yeah..." I didn't care to engage him in a dispute of any kind. I just wanted whoever was drilling my eardrums with the Black & Decker to stop.

Then he launched into a dissertation about why we Americans were so stupid to be impeaching Clinton. I disputed him mildly for a minute or so, then gave it up, preferring to concentrate on the misery emanating from my sinuses and ears than from the seat next to me.

Maybe he resented me for having a cold.

On the plus side, I met the future Mrs. BPSCG on that trip.
 
You’re splitting hairs. Is Bush not American? Was he not voted in by Americans? Is he not the leader of the United States? Most people who aren’t Americans don’t bother to make the distinction. The leader of a country is often seen as a symbol of that country.

We didn't all vote for him.

So, it's ok to ridicule you for Ms. Trudeau's behavior, or to rant at you about the Free Quebecois party? Really?
 
I don't. That's why I asked if you had them.

Impasse then, because I am going to base the decision to spend that kind of money on SOMETHING, and if anectdotes are all that are available to me, then anectdotes are all I've got to base that kind of decision on.
 
Last edited:
We didn't all vote for him.

So, it's ok to ridicule you for Ms. Trudeau's behavior, or to rant at you about the Free Quebecois party? Really?

You're proving my point.

Americans ARE ranted at for Bush, whether they voted for him or not. Bush IS lumped in with Americans in general.

Did I say anywhere that that behaviour is okay? I was stating that it existed.
 
But, there's something amiss here. Take a look at the grand total of arrivals to the US:

2000: 50,890,701
2002: 41,891,707

Same source, but look at the huge drop. In just two years, it drops 18% in two years, while the numbers from 2002 to 2003 drop 4%.

the major cause for large drop in tourism into USA between 2000 and 2002: terrorist attacks on 9/11.

There's nothing amiss.
 
Ok, took the quiz. How could anyone get under 20? Maybe 19, given the "most popular religion" question.

I find it almost sad that skeptics would miss this question. Christianity has more followers than any other religion, and until recently Catholics alone outnumbered any other denomination of any religion, but there are now more Muslims than there are Catholics.
 
Ok, took the quiz. How could anyone get under 20? Maybe 19, given the "most popular religion" question.
I got 20 right too, but could understand people missing the El Niño, also if they didn't give you options it's understandable that you can't locate some of the smaller countries.
 
I find it almost sad that skeptics would miss this question. Christianity has more followers than any other religion, and until recently Catholics alone outnumbered any other denomination of any religion, but there are now more Muslims than there are Catholics.

How about if you break Islam down into denominations, though? Are there more Sunnis than Catholics? Or does Islam only beat out Catholicism if it can include Shiites and the others?
 
Prove it. Hard data.
I was going from my personal experience. Also, there was an American entrepeneur who sold "Travel Canadian" kits to Americans with Canadian flag pins, t-shirts, and a little book on "speaking Canadian", eh. No such thing for Canadians to "go American".

What sort of "hard data" are you looking for? Are you suggesting that Canadians are treated worse than Americans in Europe? Any data for that?
Do you think we should stop criticizing Bush, so Americans can feel more welcome?
I don't care one way or the other. I guess it depends on how much the US tourist dollar is worth to you.
This is not "the whole world". This is for Europe only. The numbers for US-to-abroad are only estimates.
Right. I am trying to compare Europe as a whole to the US as a whole, apples to apples style. My point was that the raw number of Europeans who visited the US was roughly equivalent to the raw number of Americans who visited Europe. You asked for data, and I provided it. I wasn't talking about the whole world.

But, there's something amiss here. Take a look at the grand total of arrivals to the US:

2000: 50,890,701
2002: 41,891,707

Same source, but look at the huge drop. In just two years, it drops 18% in two years, while the numbers from 2002 to 2003 drop 4%.

I want to see the specified data from 2001.
Interesting, but so what? What does this have to do with comparing tourism between Europe and the US?

And that's why your argument is so weak: You deliberately choose to ignore information that, for a large part, answers your question.
Incase you have forgotten, here was my question: Tell me who is more likely to travel outside of their country: Someone who lives in a country half the size of Maine and gets six weeks of vacation, or someone who lives in a country only slightly smaller than all of Europe and gets 2 weeks of vacation?

How does the rise of the charter industry in Denmark in the 60's and 70's even come close to answering this question?

Nice, but you ignore the point. The point is, proportionally, a greater percentage of Americans visit Europe than Europeans vist the US. This goes counter to the country-specific numbers you posted earlier.

You forgot this one:

Any data on that?
I didn't look for any, and really, I don't intend to. Do you dispute it? It seems to me to be as common sense as saying that more Americans will visit another state than go to Europe.

But you have already listed a lot of geographical knowledge.
None of which requires me to find Israel on a map.
 

Back
Top Bottom