Global Cooling in 2009 (375 Sources)


1997


1996

I wonder how much cherry picking he played around with before getting the little dishonest graphs? Why did he pick 1998? Hmmmm...
 
Boring, why not the millenium of global cooling?
Because the cooling is here!

easterbrook_figure3.png
 

Fig.A2.lrg.gif

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
The years 2001-2008 rank among the ten warmest years of the 130-year (1880-2009) record and 2009 will certainly join them as one of the ten warmest years of the global surface temperature record. Based upon several factors, including the known year-to-date (January through October) temperature anomaly, recent historical values for November and December, and the presence of an El Niño episode in the tropical Pacific, the global January-December temperature for combined land and ocean surfaces is estimated to be about 0.56°C (1.01°F) above the 20th century average, which would be the fifth warmest since records began in 1880. However, uncertainty associated with the November and December outcome suggests a range of most likely ranks of fourth, fifth or sixth warmest on record. Regardless of this year's exact placement, the 2000s decade (2000-09) will be the warmest on record for the global, with a surface temperature about 0.54 °C (0.96 °F) above the long-term (20th century) average. This will easily surpass the 1990s value of 0.36 °C (0.65 °F).
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/?report=global&year=2009&month=13&submitted=Get+Report
 
Because the cooling is here!

[qimg]http://www.surfacestations.org/easterbrook/easterbrook_figure3.png[/qimg]

Congratulations, you just snatched mhaze's award for the stupidest graph ever posted in this forum!

No small feat....
 
I am using a team science Manning method. Are you now disowning him as well as Ben Santer? This may be a new record of disownership of prominent IPCC scientists! :eek:

I would say that lying doesn't become you, but without lies you have nothing.

Show me please where a climate scientist started a graph in 1998 and called it 21st century.
 
So he admits fraud? I am not surprised. The arguments we have seen to date have been one species of fraud or another, this is finally the most blatant and finally he admits to it.
 

Attachments

  • well-crank-2.jpg
    well-crank-2.jpg
    111.6 KB · Views: 5
So he admits fraud? I am not surprised. The arguments we have seen to date have been one species of fraud or another, this is finally the most blatant and finally he admits to it.
Not at all, that is 100% NOAA approved NCDC data. 21st century cooling is irrefutable.
 
Not at all, that is 100% NOAA approved NCDC data. 21st century cooling is irrefutable.

I have only just started to look at the global warming debate but from this bystander's position you seem to have been shown up in this thread as cherry picking your data range. Does warming denial get any better than this or Ian Plimer?
 
I just drank water from a cooler, the graph I just knocked up shows my head will freeze in the next 3 minutes based on recent oral cooling trends!!! HELP!!!!!
 
Does warming denial get any better than this or Ian Plimer?

No, not really... Some misuse sciency words to pretend they are somewhat scientifically literate, but this is the wrong forum for such poseurs.

There are, however, posters here that have legitimate questions about the science, like DogB or Gekko, and it tends to make for interesting debates. I'm not sure that the word denial applies to them, though, since they are honest with their figures and open to review their ideas.
 
It is not 1978 anymore! This is the 21st century of global cooling.

Without a proposed mechanism and evidence of its continued relevance, on what do you base your extrapolation of this "trend"?
 

Back
Top Bottom