Global Cooling in 2009 (375 Sources)

Congratulations, you just snatched mhaze's award for the stupidest graph ever posted in this forum!

No small feat....
Indeed.

To produce the stupidest graph requires using the method of esteemed Warmer scientist Michael Mann.

Or is that the now disgraced scientist Michael Mann? Hmmmm....

That resident Warmers would not catch the joke is telling, as they typically are seriously serious about Saving the World.

Saving the World is a Seriously Serious Serioussness.
 
Indeed.

To produce the stupidest graph requires using the method of esteemed Warmer scientist Michael Mann.

Or is that the now disgraced scientist Michael Mann? Hmmmm....

That resident Warmers would not catch the joke is telling, as they typically are seriously serious about Saving the World.

Saving the World is a Seriously Serious Serioussness.

That you would attempt to make a joke that only highlights your own mistakes and obvious misrepresentations, becomes sad rather than funny.
 
Last edited:
Indeed.

To produce the stupidest graph requires using the method of esteemed Warmer scientist Michael Mann.

Considering that neither you or Poptech did that, it's safe to say that you're your usual self. BTW, Mann is warmer than what, exactly?

Or is that the now disgraced scientist Michael Mann? Hmmmm....

Only in the deranged minds of those who insist in ignoring reality. You know, you guys...

That resident Warmers would not catch the joke is telling

You keep talking about jokes, yet the only funny things you produce are definitely unintentional.

Like that stupid graph of yours that I'm talking about. The one that shows your brutal dishonesty in all its might, and that made you scamp the last time I tried to discuss it... You know, this one

 
So no balls then?
I'll go back even farther!

image007.jpg


Still boring...
 
It is not 1978 anymore! This is the 21st century of global cooling.

Why go with the 21st century nonsense? After all, it's sooooo 10-years old! I think from now on we should limit all of our data sets to the last 4 weeks - that way every winter we could scream about global cooling and every summer we could rant about global warming!

Thank you Poptech for showing me the light!!!11!1 :jaw-dropp
 
Another 21st century global cooling denialist I see.

Nice use of color, but you forgot to increase your font size and post in bold - which, of course, are all indicators of the great degree of accuracy of your posts :rolleyes:
 
The NASA's last report on temperature indicated that 2009 was slated to become the second warmest year on record.

The starter of this thread doesn't seem to be very smart and confuses local temperatures with global temperatures.
 
That is until the 21st century cooling,

easterbrook_figure3.png

This is the NASA's data, with most of 2009 included (your data stops before the first half of 2008):



Where's your god cooling now?
 
Last edited:
Thank you.

So you would like that Little Ice Age temperature to have continued?

Where would the bikinis be then?

If they'd continued they'd be what we're used to. What do you think was wrong with them? For that matter, what do you think is better with current climate?

They wore bikinis in Polynesia in those days, when they wore anything at all.
 
The NASA's last report on temperature indicated that 2009 was slated to become the second warmest year on record.

The starter of this thread doesn't seem to be very smart and confuses local temperatures with global temperatures.

I think they're smarter than that. I'm just of the opinion that they're very cynically attempting to manipulate the information to suit their purposes. This is, however, just my opinion.
 

Back
Top Bottom