• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Glenn Beck Rape Coverup

edit: I shouldn't have posted in this again, I don't want anything to do with it. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
This might work better i it was 110% clear that it was satire, like accuse him of being a werewolf or something. Why won't he drink colloidal silver while being filmed on national TV? Doing that would clear everything up.

Not a good choice. Beck True Believers wouldn't even blink at the idea of werewolves.

They might even like the idea of him being one, as long as he was a 'good' werewolf.
 
No no, the idiots on the Internet LOVE this.

The idiots who watch Beck's show don't "get it", and never will.

It is a very clever idea; it exposes the fallacy of "Beck Inquiry" in a way that most netizens can laugh at. But by using pedophilia and rape as the alleged crime, you have charged the issue to a point that no fan of Beck would even consider the point you are making.

I'm not speculating, I'm stating fact: my neighbor is the main demo of Beck's show. She doesn't "get this" type of humor. In her eyes, you are the villain, and her best course of action is buying his next book and bumping his ratings. It helps Beck, it doesn't hurt him.

I understand: your goal is hilarity, not fixing anything. And that's a good thing, because this won't.

Party on, Wayne.

Party on, Garth. ;)
 
The idiots who watch Beck's show don't "get it", and never will.

I think this is a legitimate point. This might be fine for those of us that understand its meaning and get the satire but to others it will be either grossly off putting or simply serve to feed a victim complex.
 
I think this is a legitimate point. This might be fine for those of us that understand its meaning and get the satire but to others it will be either grossly off putting or simply serve to feed a victim complex.
There is no way to stop a victim complex anyway. They can only help themselves.
 
Exactly, why hasn't he come forward to face the accusations? Why hasn't he provided the proof of his innocence? What does he have to hide?

He has nothing to prove. The accusers have everything to prove.

As far as I know this started out as satire on Fark.com and has spread like wildfire. Those idiots can be sued for libel if this damages him professionally, socially or personally.

If you think it's so funny why don't you PM me with your name, address, phone #, name of you wife/children, brothers/sister, mother/father and friends. Maybe it could be arranged for you or someone close to you to get turned into the CPC for child abuse. No matter if it's true or not, by law they have to investigate. You are now officially in their files. If it happens again, they will put you under a microscope and none of the neighbors will let you get near your children and friends and associates will disassociate with you and you will be wearing a Scarlet Letter the rest of you life.

Pretty funny, isn't it. Hey, nothing but good 'ole satire.
 
He has nothing to prove. The accusers have everything to prove.

As far as I know this started out as satire on Fark.com and has spread like wildfire. Those idiots can be sued for libel if this damages him professionally, socially or personally.

If you think it's so funny why don't you PM me with your name, address, phone #, name of you wife/children, brothers/sister, mother/father and friends. Maybe it could be arranged for you or someone close to you to get turned into the CPC for child abuse. No matter if it's true or not, by law they have to investigate. You are now officially in their files. If it happens again, they will put you under a microscope and none of the neighbors will let you get near your children and friends and associates will disassociate with you and you will be wearing a Scarlet Letter the rest of you life.

Pretty funny, isn't it. Hey, nothing but good 'ole satire.

Unlike Glenn Beck, DavidJames isn't a public figure who is accusing, without evidence, another public figure of not being an American Citizen.

There are very different rules for public figures where libel and slander are concerned. If you don't believe me look up Flynt vs Falwell.
 
He has nothing to prove. The accusers have everything to prove.

As far as I know this started out as satire on Fark.com and has spread like wildfire. Those idiots can be sued for libel if this damages him professionally, socially or personally.

If you think it's so funny why don't you PM me with your name, address, phone #, name of you wife/children, brothers/sister, mother/father and friends. Maybe it could be arranged for you or someone close to you to get turned into the CPC for child abuse. No matter if it's true or not, by law they have to investigate. You are now officially in their files. If it happens again, they will put you under a microscope and none of the neighbors will let you get near your children and friends and associates will disassociate with you and you will be wearing a Scarlet Letter the rest of you life.

Pretty funny, isn't it. Hey, nothing but good 'ole satire.

Wow. How did this go completely over your head?
 
This is gross.

I understand I'm in the minority. And I have no love for Glenn Beck. But in my opinion, spreading lies to push your own agenda makes you the same monster you accuse Beck of being.

Give him enough rope and he'll hang himself. Don't stoop to his level.
Totally agree that it is all lies and innuendo, but I was not aware that he was planning on hanging himself, nor have I heard who has provided the rope. I refuse to stoop to this level and spread such rumors any further. Too bad though that Beck won't just deny his plans.
 
I can feel O'Reilly doing a story about this. "The website of the far-left atheist loon James Randi is slandering conservatives and trying to end free speech in America."

He would be right!

Glenn Beck is already vilified and rebuked enough by the main stream media, there is no need to make up stuff as some sort of a punishment for insulting Obama.
 
Last edited:
I can feel O'Reilly doing a story about this. "The website of the far-left atheist loon James Randi is slandering conservatives and trying to end free speech in America."

He would be right!

Glenn Beck is already vilified and rebuked enough by the main stream media, there is no need to make up stuff as some sort of a punishment for insulting Obama.


So. Your position is that Glenn is not mainstream media.
 
So. Your position is that Glenn is not mainstream media.

No way, he is a fringe player at this point who is hated by all the other networks. He is the enemy figure that the main stream media wants to discuss, he is so unreasonable that he actually helps Obama.
 
No way, he is a fringe player at this point who is hated by all the other networks. He is the enemy figure that the main stream media wants to discuss, he is so unreasonable that he actually helps Obama.

Then this will really help Beck.
 
Then this will really help Beck.


I think it will, which is exactly the problem. It's certainly not going to hurt him. At best it falls on deaf ears. At worst it hardens the resolve of his supporters.
 
Last edited:
I'd just like to opine that whether it helps beck, or hurts beck, it is contrary to the JREF mission of debunking woo, and not inventing it.
 
I'd just like to opine that whether it helps beck, or hurts beck, it is contrary to the JREF mission of debunking woo, and not inventing it.

Again, I agree. I think there are more constructive ways we can spend our time. Beck's a loon and everyone but his fanboys already knows it.
 

Back
Top Bottom