Ghislaine Maxwell

How do you know the women didn't present themselves as 18 in order to get their hands on some lucrative cash in exchange for giving Epstein a massage? ...snip...

Makes no difference to the crimes she is charged with.
 
You can stop your kid from leaving home whilst they are under the age of 17 in the UK, so in effect, you are your parents' 'property' until then.

Why you quote my post whilst not addressing my comment is a mystery to me, and I suspect yourself.

ETA: And of course your facts are as usual wrong.
 
Last edited:
Not in the USA
Not in Canada
Not in Australia
Not here in New Zealand either

USA:

When Can Teens Leave Home Legally?
Teens may legally leave home when they reach the age of majority. The age of majority in most states is 18 years old, except for the following:

In Alabama and Nebraska, the age of majority is 19.
In Mississippi, the age of majority is 21.
https://teens.lovetoknow.com/What_Are_the_Laws_on_Teenagers_Leaving_Home

So, I ask again, where were the parents, when their kids were missing school and jetting around with Epstein and Maxwell? They should be charged, too?
 
USA:


https://teens.lovetoknow.com/What_Are_the_Laws_on_Teenagers_Leaving_Home

So, I ask again, where were the parents, when their kids were missing school and jetting around with Epstein and Maxwell? They should be charged, too?

Yeah, no - wrong again :rolleyes:

Its not as absolute as you are claiming.

Here is what the actual LAW says, not what some teeny website will tell you

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/emancipation_of_minors

"Emancipation is a mechanism through which eligible minors are granted some or all of the rights and statuses adults hold. Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash Laundry, 156 F.2d 885, 890 (Utah, 1945). All states have laws dealing with the "emancipation" of minors; that is, laws that specify when and under what conditions children become independent of their parents for important legal purposes."​

https://www.findlaw.com/family/emancipation-of-minors/how-do-you-get-emancipated.html

"Some states (like Delaware and Maryland) don't allow for the emancipation of minors by court order. Other states require the minor to be at least 16. In California, for example, minors as young as 14 may become emancipated."​


Most states allow court ordered emancipation of minors at ages as low as 14.
 
Last edited:
Oh dear... this is goung to put a bit of a dent in her defence

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...black-book-with-epstein-as-early-as-the-1980s

"Ghislaine Maxwell’s association with Jeffrey Epstein began years earlier than previously understood, according to a documentary investigating the socialite who became an alleged procuress for the paedophile financier.

The new information challenges the common assumption that Epstein stepped into a vacuum in her life after the death of her father, the newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell, who was found in the sea near the Canary Islands in 1991.

Researchers working on the documentary have spoken to more than 200 sources over several years to build up a clearer picture of the society fixer. And it has emerged that her famous and rich friends, including Prince Andrew, were being used to build Epstein’s influential network from the 1980s onwards."
So the story about here only being around Epstein for a few years in the 1990s looks like it turns out to be BS

"Former staff allege that Maxwell would go out in a limousine in the evenings, looking for what she described as “nubiles” to bring back to Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, ostensibly to audition for photographic work."​

So she has also been procuring young girls for Epstein since the 1980s. That makes her a serial groomer, and a serial sex trafficker.
 
Oh dear... this is goung to put a bit of a dent in her defence

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...black-book-with-epstein-as-early-as-the-1980s

"Ghislaine Maxwell’s association with Jeffrey Epstein began years earlier than previously understood, according to a documentary investigating the socialite who became an alleged procuress for the paedophile financier.

The new information challenges the common assumption that Epstein stepped into a vacuum in her life after the death of her father, the newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell, who was found in the sea near the Canary Islands in 1991.

Researchers working on the documentary have spoken to more than 200 sources over several years to build up a clearer picture of the society fixer. And it has emerged that her famous and rich friends, including Prince Andrew, were being used to build Epstein’s influential network from the 1980s onwards."
So the story about here only being around Epstein for a few years in the 1990s looks like it turns out to be BS

"Former staff allege that Maxwell would go out in a limousine in the evenings, looking for what she described as “nubiles” to bring back to Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, ostensibly to audition for photographic work."​

So she has also been procuring young girls for Epstein since the 1980s. That makes her a serial groomer, and a serial sex trafficker.


So what? It is Epstein who is the notorious rapist. Maxwell is only charged with procuring four technically underage women and a trifling perjury claim based on her claiming she didn't know Epstein had done what he was doing.

Epstein died. Can't pin his crimes on the next available person. Talent scouting is a traditional way for model agencies to find new faces. Naomi Campbell was 'discovered' this way on a London tube train. Women want their portfolios for modelling. Nobody forced them. True, these professions, model photographers and the agencies, are notorious for inappropriate behaviour. Hard to prosecute this some forty years down the line?
 
It is Epstein who is the notorious rapist. Maxwell is only charged with procuring four technically underage women and a trifling perjury claim based on her claiming she didn't know Epstein had done what he was doing.

You get worse with every post. :rolleyes:
 
So what? It is Epstein who is the notorious rapist. Maxwell is only charged with procuring four technically underage women and a trifling perjury claim based on her claiming she didn't know Epstein had done what he was doing.
.....

The specific charges against her are representative of many years of crimes. And you don't understand the concept of "accomplice," do you?
 
...snip...

Epstein died. Can't pin his crimes on the next available person. Talent scouting is a traditional way for model agencies to find new faces. Naomi Campbell was 'discovered' this way on a London tube train. Women want their portfolios for modelling. Nobody forced them. True, these professions, model photographers and the agencies, are notorious for inappropriate behaviour. Hard to prosecute this some forty years down the line?

Is this some stream of consciousness posting as it doesn't have anything at all to do with the charges laid against her!
 
So what? It is Epstein who is the notorious rapist. Maxwell is only charged with procuring four technically underage women and a trifling perjury claim based on her claiming she didn't know Epstein had done what he was doing.

Epstein died. Can't pin his crimes on the next available person. Talent scouting is a traditional way for model agencies to find new faces. Naomi Campbell was 'discovered' this way on a London tube train. Women want their portfolios for modelling. Nobody forced them. True, these professions, model photographers and the agencies, are notorious for inappropriate behaviour. Hard to prosecute this some forty years down the line?

It's not inappropriate behavior, it's illegal behavior if proven. I really don't understand why you're defending her so much. She's being treated better than most in the American legal system. This is just getting weird. Are you really arguing that rich pimps should be treated with grace?
 
The specific charges against her are representative of many years of crimes. And you don't understand the concept of "accomplice," do you?

So, if Maxwell is 'an accomplice', as you claim, how come she wasn't charged with Epstein as a co-defendant on both occasions? What about the several 'girlfriends' who came after Maxwell - when Epstein was still abusing and raping women - or are they not accomplices as well? Or was Epstein perfectly able to commit his crimes without any help from anybody?
 
It's not inappropriate behavior, it's illegal behavior if proven. I really don't understand why you're defending her so much. She's being treated better than most in the American legal system. This is just getting weird. Are you really arguing that rich pimps should be treated with grace?

It is illegal, if that is what she did. However, Virginia née Roberts didn't come forward until 1915/1916? For crimes that supposedly happened fifteen years or more before?

Playing Devil's advocate, I put it to you that after working five years with Epstein as his chief masseur and sex worker procurer (she admits she procured hundreds ow women for him) she 'escaped' (her word) during a course in Thailand paid for by Epstein. She met her husband, Mr. Giuffre. She claims it was when her daughter was born 2015 she decided to pursue Epstein for various torts. OK, that is all very noble. However, I suggest (as a contrary view), she showed the picture of her and Prince Andrew to new hubby and they knew this would be her golden key to fame and fortune: forced to be a 'sex slave' and trafficked by Maxwell to have sex with a member of the British Royal Family. Bingo! The photo proves it.

Charge the persons concerned with whatever law has been broken. However, in sentencing, the victim's contribution towards the acts against them have to be factored in, so it is bunkum to claim Maxwell should be jailed for at least 35 years, or even 80 years, if the tabloid hype is to be believed.
 
It is illegal, if that is what she did. However, Virginia née Roberts didn't come forward until 1915/1916?

I think you mean 2015/2016, yes?


....For crimes that supposedly happened fifteen years or more before?

Playing Devil's advocate, I put it to you that after working five years with Epstein as his chief masseur and sex worker procurer (she admits she procured hundreds ow women for him) she 'escaped' (her word) during a course in Thailand paid for by Epstein. She met her husband, Mr. Giuffre. She claims it was when her daughter was born 2015 she decided to pursue Epstein for various torts. OK, that is all very noble. However, I suggest (as a contrary view), she showed the picture of her and Prince Andrew to new hubby and they knew this would be her golden key to fame and fortune: forced to be a 'sex slave' and trafficked by Maxwell to have sex with a member of the British Royal Family. Bingo! The photo proves it.

Charge the persons concerned with whatever law has been broken. However, in sentencing, the victim's contribution towards the acts against them have to be factored in, so it is bunkum to claim Maxwell should be jailed for at least 35 years, or even 80 years, if the tabloid hype is to be believed.

If you knew the slightest thing at all about abused children and teenagers, you would know that it can be years, even decades before they come to terms with what happened to them... some never do, some even off themselves because they were simply unable to cope. Why is it do you think, that so many victims of priests come forward to tell their stories when they are in their twenties, thirties, forties, in some cases, even in their fifties?

It can often be a trigger in their lives that prompts them to come forward.. a news story about the kind of abuse they suffered.. the death of the abuser, a story about another person abused by the same abuser, getting married, having their first child, the death of a partner or other loved one.

Didn't they teach you any of this in "psychology school" :rolleyes:

NOTE: ...and no, I don't give a fat rat's arse that you don't think she was a child when it happened. It is a cold, hard, undeniable fact she was legally a child, whatever your warped and disgusting worldview leads you to believe.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom