Geometry of Electron Shells

Lobscouse?!?! :D





Dem bleedin' Liverpudlians gerreverywhere! :rolleyes:
 
Trolling/lunacy aside this has actually turned out to be a very informative thread - from the science guys obviously.

Reading the explantions of particles it brings to mind a half-formed question that always springs to my mind when reading about this: these subatomic particles - do they actually exist or are they mathematical entities? Are they just models that fit observation or ss there really a little "thing" whizzing about? And is that even a relevant question? What makes me ask is things like "spin". Clearly they don't actually spin but someone was looking for a binary property and that word fits. It makes me wonder if once a particle paradigm is postulated then we start looking for particles and when we find evidence we call it particle.

OK I don't know what I'm asking but if anyone can clarify the theme I'd appreciate it.
 
Schneibster said:
Hey, if you got something to say, bring it.

I generally criticize the spectacularly stupid, and the gratingly sycophantic. It sounds as if you've been criticized. That's a shame. Here's the world's smallest record player playing, "My Heart Bleeds For You."
Click to expand...

Schneibster - I think you missed the point I was trying to make. I have no idea what prompted you to write this post. Perhaps you should read the entire thread before jumping to conculsions.
 
Zep said:
Gentlefolk all,

DJJ IS A TROLL. HE IS SIMPLY TRYING TO PUMP HIS WEBSITE HIT-COUNT AND GOOGLE-BOMB IT WITH HIS SIG. YOU ARE ADVISED NOT TO PLAY WITH HIM ANY MORE.

Regards
Click to expand...

After reading his "Jesus invented sex" thread, I must now agree with you and prewitt81. He's now the first person to make to my ignore list.
 
Jackalgirl said:
Have you seen this book yet? Good source for dead-thread posts!
Click to expand...

I have it! Haven't made the millers in onion sauce yet -- my rat traps aren't working. And I'm dying to try the drowned baby!

I'm not so happy with the covers of the new Norton editions of the Aubreyiad. I'm still trying to complete my collection of the older editions. Brilliant idea to distibrute them to soldiers in Iraq! At work we often put together care packages -- I'll have to toss in a few copies of M&C next time.
 
Last edited:
Splossy said:
Trolling/lunacy aside this has actually turned out to be a very informative thread - from the science guys obviously.

.
Click to expand...

Exactly Splossy, For foolishness and vile comments aside, this has actually been a very informative thread. Thanks for this acknowledgement.

As we have connected together Platonic Solids in the biological world with the atomic world, the middle cosmos with the micro-cosmos...as geometry is a template of creation.

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/SacredGeometry.html

As for spins, YES they are in a sense the sexuality of the atoms, as mentioned... as the two different spins have to balance each other. Combined or paired they are stable.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Exactly Splossy, For foolishness and vile comments aside, this has actually been a very informative thread. Thanks for this acknowledgement.
Click to expand...

Ummm, Egoist Davidjayjordan, it is obvious to everyone except you that Splossy was acknowledging the intelligent posters, and by "intelligent posters" Splossy meant not you.
 
Splossy said:
Reading the explantions of particles it brings to mind a half-formed question that always springs to my mind when reading about this: these subatomic particles - do they actually exist or are they mathematical entities?
Click to expand...
Another good question. We're discussing these on another thread JackalGirl started for this stuff. I think I'd like to see you there.

Meanwhile, a tease: they don't "exist" the way you think of an everyday object existing- they're far too simple to be anything like an ordinary object. But they are necessary to explain phenomena we observe every day.

Stand before a window, at night, lit from behind. You can see yourself; someone outside can see you too. As each photon strikes the air/glass interface, it must decide whether it will go on or be reflected.

How dey do dat?
 
simon dalton said:
Schneibster - I think you missed the point I was trying to make. I have no idea what prompted you to write this post. Perhaps you should read the entire thread before jumping to conculsions.
Click to expand...
Since you did not provide a referent, I assumed you were talking about MY manners- in the third person. Perhaps I was wrong, and if I was, then I apologize. I suggest that if you're going to make snarky comments, they be less elliptical or more specific.
 
Schneibster said:
Since you did not provide a referent, I assumed you were talking about MY manners- in the third person. Perhaps I was wrong, and if I was, then I apologize. I suggest that if you're going to make snarky comments, they be less elliptical or more specific.
Click to expand...

Schneibster, I was trying to build on the comments you made. I was referring to DJJ manners, which I find horrible. I am sorry that it came out the wrong way.
 
Schneibster said:
Wow. Jesus invented sex.

I just got one question. It involves etiology.
Click to expand...

Kind of like that old joke that the ability to have kids is hereditary: IOW, you can't have kids if your parents didn't.

Funny how so many of DJJ's epiphanies can be traced back to jokes. :eye-poppi
 
Schneibster said:
Wow. Jesus invented sex.

I just got one question. It involves etiology.

I
Click to expand...

All honest questions are worth answering except foolish ones.

I can;t post, that Jesus created sex, on this science board, as it would probably be deemed spamming, even though evolutionists can post evolution created sex on this science board. Go figure...

Anyway... if you have real questions, study life, biology, experience it, and maybe then read

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/JesusCreatedSex.html

Then ask.. HERE or on the Religion Board.

Don't be afraid, don't be shy, just be honest and ask sincere questions.
 
Now back to the topic of this thread, how the Lord designed the atomic structure by adding electrons one by one..... just as in human expansion and sexuality.

For again remember PHI is the generation expansion of mating pairs.... in mature populations.
 
simon dalton said:
Schneibster, I was trying to build on the comments you made. I was referring to DJJ manners, which I find horrible. I am sorry that it came out the wrong way.
Click to expand...
Accepted; my own is above, and I reaffirm it. Thank you for taking the time to make this clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom