• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: General UK Politics III - Dumb and Dumber

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm in Deepest Tory Kent at the moment for Dad's funeral.

I commented to my kids that the only placards for next week's election is for the Green party. And there are a lot of them.

That's certainly different from a few years ago.

I have wondered if the sewerage scandal is going to be particularly harmful in suppressing the Tory support.
 
I'm in Hesseltine & Johnson's old seat, Tory for over 100 years, but the only sign I've seen is for the Lib Dems. The local Labour Party organiser has told me they think they have the numbers to win outright come a GE, but I'll be keeping an eye on the polls & if tactical voting seems the better bet to turn the constituency I'll do it.
 
I'm in Deepest Tory Kent at the moment for Dad's funeral.

I commented to my kids that the only placards for next week's election is for the Green party. And there are a lot of them.

That's certainly different from a few years ago.

I have wondered if the sewerage scandal is going to be particularly harmful in suppressing the Tory support.
Sewage is a big thing around here, it will benefit the lib dems but not labour.
 
In my view, simply taking the old style (which are still posted) notification along to the polling station would have sufficed.

Here in Ireland the only two things you're mandated to bring with you are the polling card (your notification of where to vote) and some form of ID with your name on it (a bank card or any sort of work ID will suffice).

When I worked as polling clerk, I was posted locally so I never actually needed to look for ID, though those who volunteered an ID would keep the station up to the percentage we were suggested to ask randomly for ID.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...s-bbc-chair-after-months-of-mounting-pressure

Sharp has resigned as chair of the Beeb.

Some of that report by the commissioner of public appointments is incredibly mealy-mouthed: helping arrange that loan for BlowJob created a "potential perceived conflict of interest". No, it ******* well didn't! It actually was a real, genuine, bona fide conflict of interests. FFS! Could they bend over any further to try to find an absence of wrongdoing?

ETA I shall repeat what I often say about MPs and other high ups in public service: can they all have the same T&Cs and have to abide by similar policies which lowly public sector nothings, like the members of this household were, have to and manage to do quite successfully without any financial or other shenanigans? Clear job decriptions and annual appraisals against defined standards wouldn't go amiss either.
 
Last edited:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...s-bbc-chair-after-months-of-mounting-pressure

Sharp has resigned as chair of the Beeb.

Some of that report by the commissioner of public appointments is incredibly mealy-mouthed: helping arrange that loan for BlowJob created a "potential perceived conflict of interest". No, it ******* well didn't! It actually was a real, genuine, bona fide conflict of interests. FFS! Could they bend over any further to try to find an absence of wrongdoing?

ETA I shall repeat what I often say about MPs and other high ups in public service: can they all have the same T&Cs and have to abide by similar policies which lowly public sector nothings, like the members of this household were, have to and manage to do quite successfully without any financial or other shenanigans? Clear job decriptions and annual appraisals against defined standards wouldn't go amiss either.


"...The investigation also found that Johnson had personally approved Sharp’s appointment as BBC chair, while the individuals running the supposedly independent recruitment process for the job had already been informed that Sharp was the only candidate whom the government would support...."

And why didn't the people running the recruitment not make that public? Wonder what links those independent folks also had to the Tories?

ETA:

...In his resignation statement, Sharp said that “for all its complexities, successes, and occasional failings, the BBC is an incredible, dynamic, and world-beating creative force, unmatched anywhere”...​

Translation from tory-speak - "Ripe for being sold".
 
Last edited:
I still haven't got a clue who I'm voting for yet. Anyone who says they'll take us back into Europe might well get my cross in their box, but I've also tactical considerations to take into account. Our horrible Tory MP – who once lost the party whip for using the phrase 'n- in a woodpile' in a public meeting – needs to go, but Labour and the Lib-Dems seem to take it in turns to come second.
 
Worthwhile to read twitter thread on the problems with the NHS

https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1651901173216038913

Key points -

- 1 in 7 UK trained doctors now work overseas, more than double comparable countries.
- recruitment from overseas trained doctors does not plug that gap
- 1 in 8 NHS staff have been in their role for less than a year
- the average UK worker’s real wages 2.5% below the 2009 level, but earnings are down 13% for nurses and 24% for junior doctors
- in terms of relative pay, a UK nurse would earn more in Slovenia and nearly as much in Poland as the UK
- of those who have gone abroad, pay is not the prime reason, how the NHS is run and stress are bigger reasons to go
- the NHS is actually under managed, pushing managerial tasks onto medical staff.
 
I'm in Hesseltine & Johnson's old seat, Tory for over 100 years, but the only sign I've seen is for the Lib Dems. The local Labour Party organiser has told me they think they have the numbers to win outright come a GE, but I'll be keeping an eye on the polls & if tactical voting seems the better bet to turn the constituency I'll do it.

Lib Dems have always been big winners in the number of signs out. I remember growing up in Surrey and wondering how the Torys had a 25k majority when so many of the signs were Lib Dem.
 
Worthwhile to read twitter thread on the problems with the NHS

https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1651901173216038913

Key points -

- 1 in 7 UK trained doctors now work overseas, more than double comparable countries.
- recruitment from overseas trained doctors does not plug that gap
- 1 in 8 NHS staff have been in their role for less than a year
- the average UK worker’s real wages 2.5% below the 2009 level, but earnings are down 13% for nurses and 24% for junior doctors
- in terms of relative pay, a UK nurse would earn more in Slovenia and nearly as much in Poland as the UK
- of those who have gone abroad, pay is not the prime reason, how the NHS is run and stress are bigger reasons to go
- the NHS is actually under managed, pushing managerial tasks onto medical staff.
The government again this year capped the number of training places for Drs well below what is required to maintain even the current staffing levels. They've done this for a decade now (they lifted the cap for the two "pandemic" years).

Everyone knows this - it is even criticised in the staunchest of Tory media the likes of The Spectator and The Telegraph but of course it costs money as it would require more training hospitals and places.

It is short-term thinking at its absolute worse.

And of course it is another way for the Tories to gain at the expense of Labour - if Labour get in next time they have said they would raise it, but of course that will take several parliamentary lifetimes to make a significant difference.

It's akin to the crowing that they've reached their target of 20,000 new police officers, the 20,000 that was needed (the number needed is in fact higher to maintain the per captia number) because they had reduced the number of police officers by 20,000. We know there are many problems in the police force but losing 20,000 trained, experienced officers, many talking early retirement and voluntary redundancies cost a fortune, then we've had to pay even more to recruit and train the new inexperienced officers. I believe the figure quoted is that it has cost something like 18 billion overall to reduce and then recruit 20,000 officers.

Plus, and I find this very worrying given what we know are flawed vetting systems the biggest single number of recruitments was in March of this year i.e. the last month before the Tories wouldn't have met their target. That suggests to me that political pressure was being applied to get the Tories a "win". https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/government-meets-20-000-police-090554048.html
 
Last edited:
You would think no really rich person, or MP, has ever been rushed to A&E. Where do they go? How can they not know underfunding the NHS is really stupid?
 
I still haven't got a clue who I'm voting for yet. Anyone who says they'll take us back into Europe might well get my cross in their box, but I've also tactical considerations to take into account. Our horrible Tory MP – who once lost the party whip for using the phrase 'n- in a woodpile' in a public meeting – needs to go, but Labour and the Lib-Dems seem to take it in turns to come second.

Well this site should help:

https://stopthetories.vote/
 
The Prime Minister will not use the name Bannau Brycheiniog.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-65413209

Maybe the Welsh should refer to him as Richard ?

I'm torn on this one. I mean I have no objection to their trying to repeat the success of getting people to say Uluru instead of Ayers Rock, but I'm aware it's also hoped we'll call Mt Everest something different these days and I frankly can't remember what it is.

It may be that in time I'll stop calling the Brecon Beacons and Snowdonia and Snowdon by their familiar names, but it's not going to happen while I still have to Google what the new* names are.
 
The government again this year capped the number of training places for Drs well below what is required to maintain even the current staffing levels. They've done this for a decade now (they lifted the cap for the two "pandemic" years).

Everyone knows this - it is even criticised in the staunchest of Tory media the likes of The Spectator and The Telegraph but of course it costs money as it would require more training hospitals and places.

It is short-term thinking at its absolute worse.

And of course it is another way for the Tories to gain at the expense of Labour - if Labour get in next time they have said they would raise it, but of course that will take several parliamentary lifetimes to make a significant difference.

It's akin to the crowing that they've reached their target of 20,000 new police officers, the 20,000 that was needed (the number needed is in fact higher to maintain the per captia number) because they had reduced the number of police officers by 20,000. We know there are many problems in the police force but losing 20,000 trained, experienced officers, many talking early retirement and voluntary redundancies cost a fortune, then we've had to pay even more to recruit and train the new inexperienced officers. I believe the figure quoted is that it has cost something like 18 billion overall to reduce and then recruit 20,000 officers.

Plus, and I find this very worrying given what we know are flawed vetting systems the biggest single number of recruitments was in March of this year i.e. the last month before the Tories wouldn't have met their target. That suggests to me that political pressure was being applied to get the Tories a "win". https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/government-meets-20-000-police-090554048.html


We're also haemorrhaging British trained doctors to countries that will give them something approaching the respect & remuneration that their career choice, education & training merits.
 
I'm torn on this one. I mean I have no objection to their trying to repeat the success of getting people to say Uluru instead of Ayers Rock, but I'm aware it's also hoped we'll call Mt Everest something different these days and I frankly can't remember what it is.

It may be that in time I'll stop calling the Brecon Beacons and Snowdonia and Snowdon by their familiar names, but it's not going to happen while I still have to Google what the new* names are.

IMO there's a big difference between a degree of cultural inertia and proudly declaring that you're simply going to proudly continue your colonialist ways
 
IMO there's a big difference between a degree of cultural inertia and proudly declaring that you're simply going to proudly continue your colonialist ways
While it does have a bit of a reek of punching down about it, it would be a stretch to link Sunak's heritage to the English who colonised Wales.
 
While it does have a bit of a reek of punching down about it, it would be a stretch to link Sunak's heritage to the English who colonised Wales.

It would. OTOH he's doing it to mollify the Welsh Conservative Party who have done more than their fair share to keep the Welsh in their place.
 
Anthony Seldon and Raymond Newell have a book out about BlowJob; Seldon is also interviewed in The Observer.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...g-with-the-pm-who-would-be-king-boris-johnson

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/apr/30/anthony-seldon-boris-johnson-at-10-biography-interview

Tl;dr - It was even more of a **** show than most of us thought and BlowJob is even more of an egotistical incompetent than most of us thought and why the ******* **** did all those idiots vote for him? (The last bit is my addition - I'm pretty sure Seldon doesn't say that.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom