You see, Gawdzilla, empathy is illogical to conservatives. It's just that simple. This is why their policies are based on fear and selfishness.
Can you discuss a topic without insults and getting emotional?
You see, Gawdzilla, empathy is illogical to conservatives. It's just that simple. This is why their policies are based on fear and selfishness.
Can you discuss a topic without insults and getting emotional?
One step removed. The other points you dodge. As I expected.
Show where I got emotional? (I've been told logic is insulting so I won't bother with that one.)
Huh? You admit one step was removed, the key to that weapon becoming lethal is that one step, but you're still focused on the dreaded GUN. You argue from an emotional position and prove it by putting up a tragedy that was from carelessness, point proven.That one step is critical, wouldn't you agree?
Attacking me instead of replying to the issues is okay, it helps make my point that you can't support your position.
Can you discuss a topic without insults and getting emotional?
If we can, to some extent, use technology to keep a gun from being fired by anyone other than its lawful owner, that sounds like something smart to consider.
******* liberals - should all be shot!liberal
Which makes it even more amazing how many people manage to get shot by a round that wasn't supposed to be in the chamber.a gun is nothing without ammo, that's why ammo is put in another place. When the two get together, one has to have the bullets actually loaded into to the firearm. Even then you still have to kick run into the chamber.
I like this idea too.
******* liberals - should all be shot!
Which makes it even more amazing how many people manage to get shot by a round that wasn't supposed to be in the chamber.