• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Galloway is back

@trustbutverify

You may also have a look at #266 and #283 of the "Islam Propaganda" thread, as well as the protracted discussion in the "Those Diabolical Israeli Spies" thread, in particular my observations in post #47.
 
Craig B said:
May I refer you to my posts #545, denouncing Stalin as a murderer of millions, and #550, stating that Soviet crimes exceeded that of all the fascists except Hitler, because Having read these things, you will I hope be kind enough to tell me what your last post means.
Click to expand...

I never mentioned Hitler or Stalin, but I do congratulate you on your progressive statements concerning both.

First things first. Once the running dog "New American Century" imperialist pigs are finally eliminated, there will be plenty of time to take care of our "other problem".

After which a new era of peace, brotherhood and freedom will finally begin. Glory be.
 
Toontown said:
Offhand, I can think of a couple of districts which have elected some people of roughly Galloway's calibre. However, we are not in the habit of blaming Brits for our voters' misdeeds.



Other than finding it strange that such indignation would be aroused by the overthrow of a brutish family which had seized control of a fourth of Earth's proven oil reserves, had attempted to seize even more, and was generally destabilizing the critical region after having slaughtered millions by various excruciating means including mass chemical attacks...

...I find your complaint to be entirely a personal problem on the part of those professional indignants you mention. And, while it is easy to see how such indignants would be easily swayed by the wiles of a Galloway, I continue to insist that Brits must themselves take full responsibility for their voting behavior - embarrassing though it may be. They will learn nothing by the habitual resort to scapegoats.



Well, that's great...I suppose. :rolleyes:

However, it was funk de fino who did recently blame Americans for the doltish behavior of British voters, thereby giving this particular conversation it's ill-conceived genesis. I'm afraid that is simply ridiculous, no matter how prettily you package it up. When people start taking us to task for failing to correctly analyze and mute our actions to avoid affecting the behavior of their own local dolts, then I think that perhaps your search for suitable subjects for your mental disorder campaign might have ended much closer to home.
Click to expand...

You are a liar. I said nothing about the behaviour of British voters. Seems you look but don't read.
 
funk de fino said:
You are a liar. I said nothing about the behaviour of British voters. Seems you look but don't read.
Click to expand...

Then who were the "...many who had no real idea what he was about and who he was because he made a fool of some uppity Yanks."??

Were they the ones who didn't vote for Galloway, but merely idolozed him from afar?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=8323615#post8323615

Funk, the day the U.S. congress starts making decisions based on how their decisions might affect the mood swings of British street punks, will be the day I will know with certainty that the entire monkeyball has lost it, and the movie "Idiocracy" is approaching realization.
 
Last edited:
Toontown said:
Funk, the day the U.S. congress starts making decisions based on how their decisions might affect the mood swings of British street punks, will be the day I will know with certainty that the entire monkeyball has lost it, and the movie "Idiocracy" is approaching realization.
Click to expand...
Which entirely proves my point: to be an imperialist you don't need an emperor. A congress minded as you describe is perfectly sufficient.
 
Toontown

I agree with some of this. One commentator is recorded as stating with regard to the 1959-62 famine in China
Nobel Prize winner economist Amartya Sen puts this famine in a global context. His book Development as Freedom argues that lack of democracy is the major culprit: "Indeed, no substantial famine has ever occurred in a democratic country—no matter how poor." He adds that it is "hard to imagine that anything like this could have happened in a country that goes to the polls regularly and that has an independent press. During that terrible calamity the government faced no pressure from newspapers, which were controlled, and none from opposition parties, which were absent."
Click to expand...
But although the USA is a democratic country, it is also an imperial country. There is no contradiction. In the interwar period the two great colonial empires were possessed by democracies - the UK and France. Now, famines and other disorders are certainly able to occur in the colonies of democratic countries, and imperial powers, democratic or not, are perfectly capable of exploiting their weaker neighbours, or waging war for politico-economic advantage.

Moreover, I must inform you that the USA is neither the only, nor the most, democratic country. Its political system is significantly corrupt, though still essentially democratic.

So your expressed contempt for European and other democratic states is to be condemned as an mperial attitude towards the rest of the world. A hundred years ago the English were accused of this too, and not without good reason.
 
Craig B said:
...

So your expressed contempt for European and other democratic states is to be condemned as an mperial attitude towards the rest of the world. A hundred years ago the English were accused of this too, and not without good reason.
Click to expand...

Thought you'd just slip that in there, did you? No such luck.

I expressed no contempt towards democratic states. I expressed something less than deep admiration of loons and street punks whom funk de fino feels the U.S. congress must make special allowances for in it's decision-making, lest the loons be offended or punks be seized by misguided hero-worship, as the case may be, and elect mobs of Galloways to raise the spectre of idiocracy across the globe.
 
funk de fino said:
Keep digging. You lied.



Where did you copy paste that from?



The ones who quite blatantly got suckered into thinking they could haul him over the coals and make a fool of him. You do know that I work for a US company and travel there all the time? Not one of your childish Amerikka haters.



You havent grasped the timeframe have you?



Fail, I said this was the turning poiint for him as far as his ignominy and status. Nothing to do with the recent election because this was years ago and he has lost an election since then. Duh!



You keep repeating this. Is it a childish goad of some kind?



Drumming? From a liar. Too funny. You have no idea how much I hate that self serving no mark, and fools that contantly give him what he craves only make him worse. You are the air that he breathes. That why we berate you. Leave him to crawl under his rock and wither and die.

This would be like Brits starting Ron Paul threads all the time and really freaking out about him as if he is a serious person.
Click to expand...

Your nit-picking is immaterial. By your reasoning, the U.S. congress would be hostage to the vagaries of foreign street punks. They could not have brought Galloway over to answer their questions. They would have to understand the vagaries of the street punk mind so well that they would know that doing so would make a hero of Galloway. And avoiding making a hero of Galloway would have to be their primary consideration, rather than fact-finding.

All by your stated reasoning. There is no squirming out of it.
 
Toontown said:
Your nit-picking is immaterial. By your reasoning, the U.S. congress would be hostage to the vagaries of foreign street punks. They could not have brought Galloway over to answer their questions. They would have to understand the vagaries of the street punk mind so well that they would know that doing so would make a hero of Galloway. And avoiding making a hero of Galloway would have to be their primary consideration, rather than fact-finding.
Click to expand...

Start with another deflection and fails to realise the morons could have fact checked before they gave him his platform. Like we did. DOH!

All by your stated reasoning. There is no squirming out of it.
Click to expand...

Another lie.
 
funk de fino said:
Start with another deflection and fails to realise the morons could have fact checked before they gave him his platform. Like we did. DOH!
Click to expand...

Which in no way alters the fact that you have held the U.S. congress responsible for the voting behavior of foreign loons.

funk de fino said:
Another lie.
Click to expand...

No lie. The obvious implications of your accusation are obvious. If Galloway's popularity among loons is U.S. congress-endowed, then his subsequent political revivification must likewise be U.S. congress-endowed. You are obviously holding the U.S. congress responsible for the voting behavior of foreign loons.

There is no way you can squirm out of your own skin.
 
Last edited:
263894fd6478164b07.jpg


George Galloway MP, his wife Gayatri & the Iraqi hero Muntazer Zaidi, who threw his shoes at George W. Bush in Baghdad, at the inauguration of Al Mayadeen TV in Beirut
 
Muntazer looks overjoyed at the opportunity to be photographed with the Great Galloway...
 
Discussion on communism split to new thread.

Off-topic posts and personal attacks moved to AAH.

Keep it civil and on-topic from now on please.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
An hour long, intimate interview with the UK's only left-wing MP:

'Ready to Die'

 
Nobody wants to listen to this jerk crapping on for an hour.
 
I'm not sure even a truther/Assadist could make it through a full hour of El-Creepo.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom