• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Fyziks 101

I will state the obvious. They are answering. You just don't like, or don't believe (could be either; doesn't matter, really) the answers.
 
Telescoping?

Turbofan said:
Nicepants:

Here's a summary of the video since you can't see it:

Imagine a steel beam sticking straight up in the air.

Now imagine that steel beam telescoping down (vertically, straight, etc.)
into the ground.

Is that acceptable to you based on gravity?
Click to expand...

A single solid steel beam has no capacity to "telescope" (gravity-induced or otherwise).

Did I misunderstand your explanation.....or are you using the wrong word again?
 
NOBODY has tried to answer this:

Turbofan said:
Here's a perfect example of CD. Look at the structure standing straight up
at the 16 second mark.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_EdoxJam_gE

Watch how it descends STRAIGHT down in seconds!

See it again at 1:52

What is the reason for the straight down telescope?
Click to expand...

What's your take on the video?

Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- SDC
- Newtons Bit
- uk_Dave
- R. Mackey
- Pomeroo
- Nicepants
- Wildcat
- bje
- Mr. Herbert
- Anti-sophist
- Beachnut
- Reheat

Stop dodging, start answering.
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
There is no math necessary for fyziks, "common sense" is all that is needed.

Unfortunately, Turbofan doesn't seem to have any of that either.
Click to expand...

"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." -Einstein
 
Here is my answer. "Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens." Schiller said it. "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain." (Apology for using "ae" and "oe" instead of "a umlaut" and "o umlaut.")

Turbofan, here is a hint: I'm referring to your postings when I use the word "Dummheit."
 
A very large building collapsed after being hit by a plane.

Show me wrong with "fyziks", not personal incredulity.
Click to expand...

You are not answering the question abuot the steel structure that
drives straight down!

Stop avoiding the obvious!

Turbofan said:
Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- d'rok
- SDC
- Newtons Bit
- uk_Dave
- R. Mackey
- Pomeroo
- Nicepants 3 times avoiding question
- Wildcat
- bje
- Mr. Herbert
- Anti-sophist
- Beachnut
- Reheat

Stop dodging, start answering.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Turbofan said:
NOBODY has tried to answer this:



What's your take on the video?

Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- SDC
- Newtons Bit
- uk_Dave
- R. Mackey
- Pomeroo
- Nicepants
- Wildcat
- bje
- Mr. Herbert
- Anti-sophist
- Beachnut
- Reheat

Stop dodging, start answering.
Click to expand...

What? The cluster of core columns left standing after the failure of the perimeter and internal floors was laterally unrestrained and the joints between the individual lengths of steel failed as the columns moved out of upright.

What's the problem? :boggled:

You don't..... you don't seriously think those columns were single lengths of steel from ground to the top....do you?
 
Turbofan said:
You are not answering the question abuot the steel structure that
drives straight down!

Stop avoiding the obvious!
Click to expand...

You are not giving me any reason to take you seriously.

Stop avoiding the fyziks.
 
Turbofan said:
Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- Nicepants 3 times avoiding question


Stop dodging, start answering. !
Click to expand...

I answered your question in post #353, #364. (Prior to the 2nd and 3rd times you asked for an answer)

Also still waiting on your answer to #343:

nicepants said:
Were you saying that you actually see tiny explosives appearing/showing in these videos somewhere? (Or were you just mis-using that word?)
Click to expand...
 
No reason? Did you watch the video? You are fine with what you see?

Here's a perfect example of CD. Look at the structure standing straight up
at the 16 second mark.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_EdoxJam_gE

Watch how it descends STRAIGHT down in seconds!

See it again at 1:52

What is the reason for the straight down telescope?
Click to expand...

Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- d'rok 3 times avoiding question
- SDC
- Newtons Bit
- uk_Dave
- R. Mackey
- Pomeroo
- Nicepants 3 times avoiding question
- Wildcat
- bje
- Mr. Herbert
- Anti-sophist
- Beachnut
- Reheat

Stop dodging, start answering.
 
johnny karate said:
Turbofan: If the collapse of the towers was so odd and in such violation of the laws of physics that a layperson such as yourself can perceive these oddities and violations merely by looking at photos of the collapse, then why hasn't any of this been discerned and/or revealed by a single MSM outlet, law enforcement agency, or investigative body on the planet?
Click to expand...

on the planet

on the planet

on the planet

PLEASE try to understand the significance of this. OK. We hear you. Mainstream media in America are too scared of the evil neocons to publish what is clearly the scoop of the millennium.

The rest of the ENTIRE world, however, are:

1) Too stupid to understand engineering

2) Haven't watched any videos about 911 [incl. 2a) Can't get youtube]

3) Scared of / deeply in love with Cheney

Which is it? Are there any other choices? Explain them please.
 
uk_dave said:
What? The cluster of core columns left standing after the failure of the perimeter and internal floors was laterally unrestrained and the joints between the individual lengths of steel failed as the columns moved out of upright.

What's the problem? :boggled:

You don't..... you don't seriously think those columns were single lengths of steel from ground to the top....do you?
Click to expand...

If he's waiting for a response from me he's going to be waiting a long, long time. Ignore is a neat thing, you don't get to see what they write except what other people quote!

Be sure to let me know if he actually posts some math though. I might actually read his posts if they have an actual argument reinforced with some rational analysis.
 
Confuseling said:
The rest of the ENTIRE world, however, are:
Click to expand...

Not as many as you think. The truth movement is fairly large and continues
to grow.

>> 1) Too stupid to understand engineering

No need to be an engineer to know that objects don't drive themselves
straight down into the ground.

>> 2) Haven't watched any videos about 911 [incl. 2a) Can't get youtube]

Only Government loyalists seem to exclude the alternative media coverage
from that day. Most of you still haven't clicked on my video link I'm sure.

>> 3) Scared of / deeply in love with Cheney

Typical of a government loyalist.


Which is it? Are there any other choices? Explain them please.
Click to expand...

Other choices:

- denial
- pride
- lack of motivation to research alternative media coverage

... to name a few.

Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- Confuseling
- d'rok 3 times avoiding question
- SDC
- Newtons Bit Admits to avoiding response. Probably not schooled
enough to give a comprehenisve answer to the question
- uk_Dave
- R. Mackey
- Pomeroo
- Nicepants 3 times avoiding question
- Wildcat
- bje
- Mr. Herbert
- Anti-sophist- Beachnut
- Reheat

Mods/Admin, may I suggest suspending those that continue to contaminate
this thread, and avoid the question?

I have done my best to answer questions from several people at one time.

The least you all could do is explain yourselves. Look in the mirror before
you reply and ask yourself if you believe what you type.
 
Turbofan said:
Mods/Admin, may I suggest suspending those that continue to contaminate
this thread, and avoid the question?
Click to expand...
The question has been answered, your boneheaded ionability to see that is your problem.

I have done my best to answer questions from several people at one time.
Click to expand...
I sincerely hope that isn't true... if that's your 'best" I'd hate to see what tripe you come up with on a bad day.
 
Sorry, I can't quite follow your reasoning there chap.

Lets take the Central Committee of the Chinese government, as a random example.

Are their efforts to destroy the US government by revealing the conspiracy hampered by denial, pride, or lack of motivation to research alternative media coverage?
 
Wildcat,

Show me a response from anyone explaining how the structure drives
straight down in a matter of seconds?

Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- Confuseling
- d'rok 3 times avoiding question
- SDC
- Newtons Bit Admits to avoiding response. Probably not schooled
enough to give a comprehenisve answer to the question
- uk_Dave
- R. Mackey
- Pomeroo
- Nicepants 3 times avoiding question
- Wildcat 3 times avoiding question
- bje
- Mr. Herbert
- Anti-sophist
- Beachnut
- Reheat
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom